Hide my smokes


sorabji.com: Why did you do it?: Hide my smokes
THIS IS A READ-ONLY ARCHIVE FROM THE SORABJI.COM MESSAGE BOARDS (1995-2016).

By Cat on Friday, August 16, 2002 - 08:42 am:

    I know you did it.

    I have some cigarettes somewhere in this house. Where did you hide them, cockflakes?


By spunky on Friday, August 16, 2002 - 09:24 am:

    Gotta watch out for the people in NY, I understand they are paying between $5-$7 a pack.


By Cat on Friday, August 16, 2002 - 10:33 am:

    Bloody New Yorkers.


By Dougie on Friday, August 16, 2002 - 12:00 pm:

    I pay $5 in Nassau County. NYC'ers pay $7.50. All it's done is create a bigger market for buying cigs online.


By Kalliope on Friday, August 16, 2002 - 02:42 pm:

    suckers. move to richmond, home to our hero and saviour phillip morris. (mmm big factory). i pay three bucks. when i first moved here it was under two..

    nonsmoking assmonkeys.


By patrick on Friday, August 16, 2002 - 03:01 pm:

    this is actually some refreshing bit of news about education.

    further, its a program I can support even as a part-time smoker even though i voted against the increase a few years back.


By spunky on Friday, August 16, 2002 - 03:30 pm:

    I know, this came from Rush, but....
    I was listening to him today at lunch and a school teacher from VA called in.
    Guess what he said?
    Schools do not need more money.
    More money is not going to fix it.
    Guess what he (the teacher) suggested?
    Letting the kids who would rather cause problems in the class room leave.
    Then he could concentrate on the kids who wanted to be there.
    California has a huge tax base.
    Levying an additional 50 cent per pack tax on the abused smokers (dont tell me that smokers have not taken a lot shit in the last decade)sounds really good to non-smoking parents with children who hate being in school anyway, but the smokers are tired of paying for every tax increase lately.

    Now, I understand that this particular issue is discussing this specific tax going to a preschool for disadvantaged kids.
    That sounds great, but you are telling me that there is simply no money anywere else in the CA state tax revenue or budget to cover this?

    What about property tax, which is what is traditionally used to partially fund schools?
    Or sales tax?
    Or federal funds?
    Some counties even use parking fines to pay for schools.
    Why continue to target an embattled, singled out market?


By patrick on Friday, August 16, 2002 - 03:49 pm:


    "Letting the kids who would rather cause problems in the class room leave."

    Kids have proven time and time again they arent the best judge of whats best for them. What a moronic statement. There's a reason they are protected as minors by the law.

    Moreover its in your best interest children that arent even yours are educated.


    Smokers are penalized because of the undue burden they put on the health system that EVERYONE pays for. A non-smoker's insurance premiums are inflated because of smokers. Tax dollars are strained with public health because of smokers. Even as a smoker i understand this. So saying smokers are "abused" is just ludcrious.

    Trace there is no money in CA. Especially now as our governor blew it.

    Im sure Nate can tell you how expensive property taxes are.Sales tax in LA county is alread 8.5% i dont think we need to raise that.

    School funding comes from a plethora of bond issues, city revenue and so forth which may or may not include parking fines, conviction fines, lottery etc etc.

    The article above only singles out LA County and is a program to pick up where Head Start failed. Something you, as a father of young children should be very interested in.

    I KNOW the importance of teaching children at a young age. We've always talked about making sure our child is bilingual. Well, the best way to teach a child a second language is pre-school. Something "meathead" recognizes and I applaud him for this initive.

    But that aside....you really should stop listening to Rush, moreover his listeners. I mean really, this paraphrase here is just ridiculous.


By Nate on Friday, August 16, 2002 - 04:57 pm:

    prop 13, baby. property tax is 1%.

    "Smokers are penalized because of the undue burden they put on the health system that EVERYONE pays for"

    this is bullshit. what about fat people? speeders? people who drink?

    taxes should be universal. not target a specific demographic just because that particular sin isn't PC at the moment.

    the reason we have no money for education is because gray 'goosefucker' davis, whose top three priorites were "education, education and education", blew a ton of money on bad electricity deals.

    we need to cut welfare way down and boost education spending. that would fix a shitload of california's problems.

    taxing cigarettes is just fucking wrong.


By patrick on Friday, August 16, 2002 - 05:03 pm:

    nate i believe it was you who argued that point long ago...about the burden smokers put on public health.


By patrick on Friday, August 16, 2002 - 05:14 pm:

    every one needs food.
    no one needs cigarettes.


By Antigone on Friday, August 16, 2002 - 05:52 pm:

    "this is bullshit. what about fat people? speeders? people who drink?"

    Speeders are given tickets.

    Drunk people are arrested for DWI and public intoxication. Alcohol is taxed heavily in many places.

    Fat people...er...sue fast food establishments?

    You're batting .333, anyway. :)



By Antigone on Friday, August 16, 2002 - 05:53 pm:

    Oh, I forgot.

    Ideologically blinded people are given an ass fucking on sorabji.


By Cat on Friday, August 16, 2002 - 06:25 pm:

    This is not helping me find my smokes.


By TBone on Friday, August 16, 2002 - 06:37 pm:

    I'm all for taxing vices.

    Tax it all! Tobacco, Alcohol, Fast Food, Gasoline, Fucking, Drugs, Rock and Roll, Bad Jokes, Porn, Whining, Caffeine, Gambling, Internet, Sarcasm, Procrastination, Advertising, Children, Oxygen, TV, Cars, Gossip, Therapy, Ass

    When kids can choose to leave school, stealing your car is no longer extra-curricular.

    How many of us would have stuck through school if we could simply have walked? That's not rhetorical. In a sense, kids CAN refuse to go. Many would rather cause trouble.


By Antigone on Friday, August 16, 2002 - 06:41 pm:

    Cat, ask that little black rat of yours. He probably hid them from his mommy.


By Cat on Friday, August 16, 2002 - 06:48 pm:

    Hey I see Max has lost some weight,


By spunky on Friday, August 16, 2002 - 09:38 pm:

    "Smokers are penalized because of the undue burden they put on the health system that EVERYONE pays for."

    OK, and drinking does not burden the health system?

    Why not add the 50 cents to ever can of beer?
    Or bottle of wine???

    And if you think the carbon monoxide that comes ciggies is worse then what spews from that old 72 olds in front of you, then you need to think again.


By Nate on Friday, August 16, 2002 - 10:28 pm:

    i think i heard an airplane drive by my house.

    earlier, it sounded like AKIRA. zzzrooom!

    hahah! i'm so cute.

    zzzrrroooooom!!!


By Kalliope on Saturday, August 17, 2002 - 01:21 pm:

    nate=dork.

    hah whatd you say patrick? everyone needs to eat no one needs to smoke? tell that to me next time im having a nic fit. ill sacrifice a breakfast burrito for a pack of smokes anyday.


By Hal on Sunday, August 18, 2002 - 10:00 am:

    Cat....


    That honestly has to be the biggest fucking cat I've ever seen.... oh my god, what did it eat a fucking grayhound?


By pez on Sunday, August 18, 2002 - 02:23 pm:

    it's harder to put taxes on alcohol... if it were overtaxed more people would turn to homebrew and moonshine.

    but cigarettes, the way i see it is that the only way to ever make people stop is to educate them. if a person wants to smoke, let them smoke as long as they don't blow it in my face.

    what about homeschooling and unschooling? there are tons of kids that start out wanting to learn only to have the desire beaten out of them through years of bells and well-meaning teachers that don't have the time or resources to give each child the education they need.


By moonit on Monday, August 19, 2002 - 05:05 am:

    We get huge taxes on smokes and alcohol here.
    sucks


By patrick on Monday, August 19, 2002 - 01:01 pm:


    socialization is a good thing pez.

    id say its a little more complex than saying

    "to have the desire beaten out of them through years of bells and well-meaning teachers that don't have the time"

    homeschooled kids are too often fucking weird (in a bad way).


By Spider on Monday, August 19, 2002 - 02:02 pm:

    8.5% sales tax??


By patrick on Monday, August 19, 2002 - 02:18 pm:

    CA is pricey.


By The Dinner Lady on Monday, August 19, 2002 - 04:14 pm:

    Well I do admire that the FDA has all these rules about not letting in/delaying for years all sorts of new drugs which are OK in Europe into the US market, you know the abortion pill, HIV drugs,... yet when it's something like a pack of Marlboros, they don't see a problem with putting them on the shelf.

    I don't smoke but I don't begrudge people the right to do it if they like, but do they really think putting a big tax on cigs is going to make people quit? Ciggies are pumped full of other things besides tobacco to make them extra addictive. If the US Dept of Public Health is so concerned about the the 'health risk' and 'undue burden they put on the health system that EVERYONE pays for' why don't they make things like nicorette or the patch a free government program? Or better yet make cigarettes illegal? I mean, they do seem to be proven to be linked to killing you. What other food/drug do we allow to be sold over the counter like that? You can't even get coedine cough syrup without a prescription for chrissakes.

    The tax is just a way to screw smokers, then congratulate yourself about 'doing something for American health' - as if. I mean really now, who are the majority of people who'll you think will wind up paying this tax? A bunch of rich white guys or a bunch of poor minorities?

    DUR!


By pez on Monday, August 19, 2002 - 04:53 pm:

    patrick, do you really want me to break out the soapbox again?

    school is not an institution built for socialization. what about little league and scouting? 4h and non-school classes? music groups?

    there are a lot of weird homeschoolers, but many are raised by religious-fanatic parents that teach them their abc's and bible stories. but as far as homeschooling success stories go, my old best friend about three years ago is eighteen and just got her bachelor's degree with honors in biology and harp. next year she'll be getting a third in flute. and she's not weird.


By TBone on Monday, August 19, 2002 - 04:58 pm:

    The tax isn't designed to make people quit.

    If people quit, the government gets less money.

    It's designed to generate money in a way that is most publicly acceptable. Smoking is not terribly PC right now, so it's politically acceptable to tax it.


By TBone on Monday, August 19, 2002 - 05:00 pm:

    There's no denying that home schoolers are generally better educated.

    What's wrong with weird?


By patrick on Monday, August 19, 2002 - 05:14 pm:

    "There's no denying that home schoolers are generally better educated."

    are you sure of this?

    im sure we all have our anecdotal homeschooling stories. thats not really the point though i have mine: the homeschooling kids i lived next door were isolated, sheltered, and got their "schooling" from VHS tapes. Their mother, who was not a certified teacher facilitated the "education". How can that be a "better" education.

    pez, how is public school not built for socializing? its absolutely made for socializing. Everything from the sports to drama dept, community art projects, student government etc etc. How is that not meant for socialization?

    Quality of education is one item.

    Socialization that homeschooling may or may not bea able to provide is another.


By TBone on Monday, August 19, 2002 - 05:23 pm:

    Not really. The home schooled kids who then went to my highschool all seemed to have good grades.

    Sheltered, yes. Isolated, sometimes.

    But so was I.

    I can't imagine being stuck with my parents all day every day until age 14. Horror.

    I wasn't really defending homeschooling. I was responding to Pez's description of the homeschooler who had the great grades and skills and wasn't weird.


By pez on Monday, August 19, 2002 - 07:00 pm:

    you're talking about extracurriculars. which are optional and not availible to all.

    right now i'm continuing my education through "unschooling", by reading and completing projects. self-publishing, collaborating practicing and learning about subject that are generally unavailible to people attending school.

    i love the idea of school, just not the way it's done, a matter of my own opinion which i'd be happy if others shared but i can respect people who do not think the same way.


By patrick on Monday, August 19, 2002 - 07:13 pm:

    yes SOME are optional but thats part of the point. electing to participate, or not.

    While i think its great you're continuing your education, i also think you're missing out by not going to college or being taught in an academic environment. You miss out on a certain interaction. There are advantages to a classroom setting i believe.

    What subjects are "generally unavailable"?


By dave. on Monday, August 19, 2002 - 07:38 pm:

    plus, when you're in your 30's and you've shed the majority of your youthful idealogy, you'll be kicking yourself for being such a stupid, goddam know-it-all when you were all anti-establishment. you'll wish you'd gone to college when you had so little standing in your way. believe it or not, you are going to go through so many profound changes in the next 10 years that you can't even possibly understand. you'll contradict yourself again and again. especially if you have kids. no matter where you go, there you are -- hopefully not regretting mistakes.

    /sermonette


By agatha on Monday, August 19, 2002 - 07:40 pm:

    patrick, please remind yourself of your views as a young adult, and let pez get through this time of her life in the way she sees fit. she's obviously thinking about a lot of heavy issues, which is more than i can say for most people twice her age.

    that being said, i think homeschooling is difficult to do well. as the mother of an eight year old, i know that i would be doing a clear disservice to her by homeschooling. however, i've known others who responded very well to homeschooling and went on to kick ass later on in life. it's all about knowing what you are capable of as a parent, and being honest about your strengths and shortcomings.

    as far as college goes, i see the doors that my degree have opened for me since graduating. i also see dave, who is twice as intelligent as me, being denied opportunities because of his lack of formal education. i have reached the conclusion that college is one of those hoops that proves very helpful to jump through at some point in time in life.


By agatha on Monday, August 19, 2002 - 07:43 pm:

    wow, dave and i surfing on the same karmic wavelength. whoah!

    although, he states it much more absolute and bitter terms than i did. you're not going to be grumpy when you get home, are you hunny?


By patrick on Monday, August 19, 2002 - 07:44 pm:

    "let pez get through this time of her life in the way she sees fit"

    its a conversation agatha, completely transparent.


By pez on Monday, August 19, 2002 - 07:54 pm:

    i do intend to go back to my formal education at some point-- when i know what i want to do and how i'm going to achieve it. when i am ready to go on.

    right now it's about discovering myself-- finding interests and subjects to focus on. moving out of my parents' home has opened up some new doors in my life: where to go and what i can do, mostly.

    i will admit that i participated in a few activities in school, namely band and writers' guild, i also performed in a play and trained in color guard and irish dance (though i was pulled by my parents before performance, having no control over transportation).

    never regarded school to be a social activity, but this opinion is a result of my own unpopularity that i was unable to shake in the public school system of petty suburbite adolecents.

    as far as finances go, i will never be as comfortable as some of my former classmates who have known their paths and stuck to them since Day One. once i know what to do i will do it, to the satisfaction of myself and no other, very few people know that they have this luxury availible and it's rather sad.

    but i'm intending to possible take two classes this fall-- caponeira and darkroom photography.


By sarah on Monday, August 19, 2002 - 09:41 pm:


    Cat, did you ever read "Getting Over It" by Anna Maxted? your sense of humor reminds me of the main character in that novel.



By Cat on Monday, August 19, 2002 - 11:09 pm:

    Nope.

    But I'm doing a google search on it right now and if the main character is some sick twisted nasty-pants bitch, you and I are going to have a little chat.


By Cat on Monday, August 19, 2002 - 11:12 pm:


By spunky on Monday, August 19, 2002 - 11:55 pm:

    "What other food/drug do we allow to be sold over the counter like that?"

    Two words.
    Big Mac.

    And I am not sure that the chicken nuggets are really chicken. Or the filet of fish is REALLY fish


By J on Tuesday, August 20, 2002 - 01:49 am:

    I know for a fact that jack-in- the- box tacos are made out of soy,it's the mystery meat.


By The Dinner Lady on Tuesday, August 20, 2002 - 05:43 pm:

    "jack-in- the- box tacos are made out of soy"

    But that sounds so... HEALTHY.



    Now I'm scared.


By The Dinner Lady on Tuesday, August 20, 2002 - 05:43 pm:

    "jack-in- the- box tacos are made out of soy"

    But that sounds so... HEALTHY.



    Now I'm scared.


By patrick on Tuesday, August 20, 2002 - 06:03 pm:

    if you want a taco, why would you even think of going to JinB anyway?

    theres a great place (in Vegas and Phoenix too i think) called Tacos Mexico. sixty cents each. The best carne asada, carnitas, pollo and al pastor tacos intown.


By J on Wednesday, August 21, 2002 - 02:32 am:

    Cause of Jack's secret sauce,you know.


By The DinnerDonut Lady on Wednesday, August 21, 2002 - 04:18 pm:

    I'm afraid to ask what that's made out of. If the rest of the taco is any indication it's probably St. John's Wort, Echinacea, and oat bran.

    I didn't even know they still had Jack in the Box. This is the problem with living in the NE. We don't even have Krispy Kreme yet, though maybe that's a good thing because if we did I'd survive only on hot glazed.


By Ophelia on Thursday, August 22, 2002 - 11:37 am:

    But we got our beans and chowdah!!!


By A on Tuesday, November 30, 2004 - 10:03 pm:


By wisper on Wednesday, December 1, 2004 - 06:52 pm:

    this is by far the most random and nonsensical post to an old thread, ever.

    a link to a homeschooling links page

    bravo


bbs.sorabji.com
 

The Stalking Post: General goddam chit-chat Every 3 seconds: Sex . Can men and women just be friends? . Dreamland . Insomnia . Are you stoned? . What are you eating? I need advice: Can you help? . Reasons to be cheerful . Days and nights . Words . Are there any news? Wishful thinking: Have you ever... . I wish you were... . Why I oughta... Is it art?: This question seems to come up quite often around here. Weeds: Things that, if erased from our cultural memory forever, would be no great loss Surfwatch: Where did you go on the 'net today? What are you listening to?: Worst music you've ever heard . What song or tune is going through your head right now? . Obscure composers . Obscure Jazz, 1890-1950 . Whatever, whenever General Questions: Do you have any regrets? . Who are you? . Where are you? . What are you doing here? . What have you done? . Why did you do it? . What have you failed to do? . What are you wearing? . What do you want? . How do you do? . What do you want to do today? . Are you stupid? Specific Questions: What is the cruelest thing you ever did? . Have you ever been lonely? . Have you ever gone hungry? . Are you pissed off? . When is the last time you had sex? . What does it look like where you are? . What are you afraid of? . Do you love me? . What is your definition of Heaven? . What is your definition of Hell? Movies: Last movie you saw . Worst movie you ever saw . Best movie you ever saw Reading: Best book you've ever read . Worst book you've ever read . Last book you read Drunken ramblings: uiphgy8 hxbjf.bklf ghw789- bncgjkvhnqwb=8[ . Payphones: Payphone Project BBS
 

sorabji.com . torturechamber . px.sorabji.com . receipts . contact