THIS IS A READ-ONLY ARCHIVE FROM THE SORABJI.COM MESSAGE BOARDS (1995-2016). |
---|
By GaJay9aol.com on Monday, April 27, 1998 - 12:37 pm: |
|
By SlyDog on Tuesday, July 7, 1998 - 08:02 pm: |
|
By Nate on Wednesday, July 8, 1998 - 01:28 pm: |
|
By Kelsey on Wednesday, July 8, 1998 - 03:15 pm: |
|
By Blindswine on Wednesday, July 8, 1998 - 05:37 pm: |
|
By Chordata on Thursday, July 9, 1998 - 09:08 pm: |
|
By Strange on Thursday, July 30, 1998 - 04:22 pm: |
-your friend, strange Also as far as what is art it's either everything or nothing, basically. |
By Kelsey on Thursday, July 30, 1998 - 11:43 pm: |
love and hate the same? gotta disagree with you there. for me, they couldn't be more different. however, i am not the only emotion experiencing neuron bundle on this planet, either. maybe we are both right? |
By Kelsey on Thursday, July 30, 1998 - 11:43 pm: |
love and hate the same? gotta disagree with you there. for me, they couldn't be more different. however, i am not the only emotion experiencing neuron bundle on this planet, either. maybe we are both right? |
By Kelsey on Thursday, July 30, 1998 - 11:43 pm: |
|
By Quidam on Friday, July 31, 1998 - 12:10 am: |
|
By Starchy on Friday, July 31, 1998 - 03:44 pm: |
Stoopid brain! Brain? What brain? Ha-ha! Fooled.. me! |
By Quidam on Friday, July 31, 1998 - 07:37 pm: |
No, nothing so intellectual. I'm much to low brow for that. |
By Strange on Wednesday, August 5, 1998 - 02:22 am: |
In a nigh-lugubrious daze, Strange P.S. READ THE OPENING CONVERSATION BETWEEN ROMEO AND BENVOLIO IN Romeo and Juliet. |
By Starchy on Wednesday, August 5, 1998 - 12:14 pm: |
In my experience, hate can spring from frustration just as easily as it can from disgust. |
By Nate on Wednesday, August 5, 1998 - 01:37 pm: |
lust is not love nor hate. lust can fool you into feeling either, i suppose. but what do i know? i have a feeling my expierence with hate echos your expierence with love. i can't think of anyone i've really hated. there have been times where i've thought i hated someone, but retrospect shows my error. |
By Strange on Wednesday, August 5, 1998 - 03:36 pm: |
The truth is a conglomeration of the world's most popular lies, Strange |
By Nate on Wednesday, August 5, 1998 - 04:15 pm: |
just a thought. |
By Kelsey on Wednesday, August 5, 1998 - 07:23 pm: |
|
By Strange on Thursday, August 6, 1998 - 01:43 am: |
Chitty Chitty Bang Bang Strange Also, someday soon I'll post some of my rants here if any will lend attention. |
By Lurker on Thursday, August 6, 1998 - 02:56 am: |
when you know you love someone so much you just want to give her everything and anything you've got, without expecting anything in return. you just have to give. because you love her with all your heart. yes, you *want* something back, you wish she loved you back, but even when you're not getting love in return she still gives you so much just by being who she is that you keep loving her not by choice but by default. has anyone felt this? (ps: it's possible that for this to be possible, there needs to be some form of love for you in her heart that is not of the outspoken direct kind, but something more fuzzy and abstract somewhere deep down. i don't know.) |
By Lurker on Thursday, August 6, 1998 - 02:58 am: |
|
By Nate on Thursday, August 6, 1998 - 12:25 pm: |
i don't think love is something that exists in a single person. it is a combined emotion of two people. you have to feel -for- and -from- a person. single sided infatuation is no more love than having someone infatuated with you. i also think you have to experience love to begin to understand it. i know that to people who have never experienced it, it is hard to fathom how different it could be from your own realm of emotion. you can't comprehend that which is outside what you know to be. |
By Kelsey on Thursday, August 6, 1998 - 01:12 pm: |
|
By Starchy on Thursday, August 6, 1998 - 03:29 pm: |
|
By Chordata on Friday, August 7, 1998 - 03:55 am: |
if he calls what he feels love, then it is. why is his type of love invalidated because it doesn't match your definition? i think only he really knows. |
By Starchy on Friday, August 7, 1998 - 11:20 am: |
i gave my thoughts on the subject, as did he if what i've said came off that way, than it did not come across as i meant it to i think only no one really knows any thing |
By Nate on Friday, August 7, 1998 - 12:17 pm: |
the word love has lost meaning because of how often it is used incorrectly. "i love you man" "oh god i love chocolate" etc. love does has a specific meaning. you don't see me hitting a ball against a wall and calling it tennis. tennis takes two people. |
By Blindswine on Friday, August 7, 1998 - 03:28 pm: |
bartender? |
By Antigone on Sunday, August 9, 1998 - 02:26 am: |
And love is one of the most slippery concepts in human experience. The problem in English is that we have only one word for so many feelings. Romantic love, platonic love, familial love, friendly love, love of place, love of things, Christ's love, Bodhissatva's love, obsessive love. So many aspects, from the mundane, to the holy, to the interpersonal. Are these all aspects of the same experience? What do they have in common? And how can you say that any one of them isn't *really* love? |
(maybe I just love skirt - shame it's not reciprocated) It's a useful (if somewhat depressing) exercise to quantify the abstract. What you want and what you get. What you can "realistically" expect. When you apply defined parameters you can come up with limited solutions. For example if you think of love (or art) as a job and then ask why you can't get one. Why does the other get what I can't? How does this happen? love is god is truth is... just a lot of fannying around. Sweet mystery of life...where the !@%^£!@ are you hiding? |
'when you apply defined parameters you can come up with limited solutions' if you're uncreative and give up easily, maybe..otherwise, a little definition sets the starting point for infinite possibilities.. but you're right in that, things won't come under a desperate and tight grasp... you just need to be open and let it come.. but.. i think art and love can't always be lumped together as the same entity... one involves some intelligence and the other just happens.. |
maybe it's possible to invert that? love involves some intelligence and art just happens. maybe both are easy except when others are involved? maybe both are impossible except when others are involved? How do I make an art? what do I need to make an art? inclination? inspiration? space? materials? time? complicity? how do I make a love? what do I need to make a love? fannying around again.... and back into the mysterious marketplace of negotiable metaphysics? we need to define specifics. what price art? what price love? am you buying or selling? unless we lay down an immutable rationale for evaluation then it's just a case of bargain hunting and feeling ripped off. maybe it's just me that hasn't seen the price list? |
I live alone in the sky. I keep geese. I smell blood. Maybe I'm paranoid but I feel like I'm going to get done over. |
|
It may exist but I haven't seen it. And long may it stay that way. |
|