willard wigan


sorabji.com: Is it art?: willard wigan
By droopy on Friday, August 7, 2009 - 06:43 pm:

    i'd heard about this guy before, or what he does. a couple of nights ago there was a feature about him on the bbc worldservice (radio). he creates mirco-art. there's something about this that really captures my imagination. not just the fact that he can do it, but the idea of art that can't be seen by the human eye. you have to look at his art through a microscope.


By sarah on Sunday, August 9, 2009 - 04:13 pm:


    that's really incredible. hard to comprehend someone being able to have so tiny detailed workmanship.


    did you hear that John Hughes died?




By Dr Pepper on Monday, August 10, 2009 - 01:42 am:

    John Hughes who?


By heather on Monday, August 10, 2009 - 02:43 am:

    oh pepper


By Danielssss on Monday, August 10, 2009 - 02:59 pm:

    so heather what is the smallest art you have created in the last seven days?


By droopy on Monday, August 10, 2009 - 03:39 pm:

    micro-art was incorporated into one of those weird, disjointed dreams i have. i was at someone's house or apartment; it seemed to be a combination of some of the places i've lived over the years plus an ultra-modern touch. everything was bare-bones: just some furniture and appliances. anything decorative - art on the wall, knick-knacks on a table, even the television - you had to look at using a loupe. the person who lived there showed me around. he was indisinct, i don't quite know what he looked like. but he did carry his loupe on a necklace, which he was careful to keep hidden. i more or less understood that in this dreamworld art of any kind was illegal.

    yes, i heard john hughes died. i really wasn't much of a fan of his. though i think he did ferris buehler(sp?), and i kind of liked that one.


By heather on Monday, August 10, 2009 - 11:46 pm:

    the smallest and the biggest art does not have a physical component.

    on saturday i took some photos at a friend's (well, 2 friends) wedding.


By droopy on Tuesday, August 11, 2009 - 02:34 pm:

    the smallest and the biggest art does not have a physical component.

    that sentence is like art. i'm looking at it, but i don't know quite what it's supposed to mean. but i'll groove on it anyway.


By Appreciativessss on Tuesday, August 11, 2009 - 05:12 pm:

    that sentence is art, all meaning aside. like, one might suppose, your glasses. (Those Glasses!)

    would you care to expand on this profundity and any idiosyncratic meaning?


By Dr Pepper on Wednesday, August 12, 2009 - 02:21 am:

    I have seen that art, it was on nationl georgaphic a long time ago when i was like 8 or 9 years old, i was always fantastic on reading it.