No I,m drunk but can,t post to drunken rambelings

sorabji.com: Are you stupid?: No I,m drunk but can,t post to drunken rambelings
By J on Monday, January 10, 2000 - 02:47 am:

    Now I,m worried what am I going to do if I can,t work a computer? The one I wanted was under a grand,now he,s shelled out 3 times that,I can,t even figure out how to make tapes.I had trouble using a mouse.

By Czarina on Monday, January 10, 2000 - 02:55 am:

    You'll do fine.Just play around with it.And theres always technical help availabe on and off line.
    I just checked out that other site.Thank God they're in prison.What were they thinking,if I had tits that small I'd never let him take naked pics of me.I guess the jury didn't have to deliberate too long on that case.But why 30 years,in this case I think death would have been a much better sentence.

By J on Monday, January 10, 2000 - 03:17 am:

    Czarina...."play around with it"? That,s what he said. I think it was the smile on his face that spared them,he died with a smile on his face.

By R.C. on Monday, January 10, 2000 - 04:26 am:

    Czarina -- what'st he URL for "that other site"?

By Patrick on Monday, January 10, 2000 - 12:02 pm:

    HEY!!!!!!!!!!!!


    any free weird naked shit found on the internet MUST be reported immediately to the sorabji clan.....see section 6 code 4 line 49

By semillama on Monday, January 10, 2000 - 07:11 pm:

    jkey words: "free" and Weird', cuz who wants to see normal naked shit you have to pay for?

    the great thing about the internet is that it has raised the ambient cosmic background weirdness 569% in the last 6 years.

By CosmicDebris on Monday, January 10, 2000 - 07:43 pm:

    Hey, What the fuck?

By Czarina on Monday, January 10, 2000 - 11:38 pm:

    RC-----its those hidious pics of that [most unattractive] biker couple who kill her husband, then dismember him, arrange his body parts in a variety of "clever" poses, photograph his parts and themselves,[nude], adding "cute" captions, and then the fools took the film to Walmart, I guess maybe to have a memento/keepsake,[like you could ever forget that!], and thank God the film-keeper reported them.

By Gee on Tuesday, January 11, 2000 - 12:18 am:

    I know this sounds weird, but it disturbes me that when you take your film somewhere to be developed, all the little people there are looking at your pictures. what do you do if you want to take naughty pictures and don't know how to develop film? There's no justice.

By Patrick on Tuesday, January 11, 2000 - 01:08 pm:

    there is plenty of justice, you pay a price for your naughtiness, either you learn to develope them, accept some high school drop out will be wanking (so you hope) to your beautiful body or you send it to a squirrely mail order place and hope they don't rip you off, or you can get a polaroid

By Markus on Tuesday, January 11, 2000 - 01:23 pm:

    Or you get a digital camera. It's the 90's, you know.

    Oops.

By Patrick on Tuesday, January 11, 2000 - 03:02 pm:

    realistically though.....digitial camera, at least 1k plus scanner and printer, polaroid, $25, plus $1 per shot....

By J on Tuesday, January 11, 2000 - 03:25 pm:

    I have seen some for $650.00

By Salem on Monday, July 24, 2000 - 02:06 pm:

    You don't need a scanner to use a digital camera. They come with firewire, usually, or that freaky sony "memory stick"