that's fucking amazing. i would have thought it would be a lot higher. |
Those headlines reminded me of supermarket tabloids. |
|
The best part is the very end: "Are peace and security best achieved by seeking strong alliances and international consensus, led by the United States? Or is it necessary to take a more unilateral approach, accepting and enhancing the global dominance that, according to some, history has thrust upon us? If we do decide to seize empire, we should make that decision knowingly, as a democracy. The price of maintaining an empire is always high. Kagan and others argue that the price of rejecting it would be higher still. That's what this is about. " I couldn't agree more. Personally, I don't know whether we should be the world's policeman. But we should have an open debate about it. Calling pro-war people "baby killers" and anti-war people "America haters" does nothing to make us safer. |
"Calling pro-war people "baby killers" and anti-war people "America haters" does nothing to make us safer." |
|
This is giving intelligence that has no business being released. This *is* giving aid to the enemy. |
MOAWS Cool |