THIS IS A READ-ONLY ARCHIVE FROM THE SORABJI.COM MESSAGE BOARDS (1995-2016). |
---|
By Sorabji on Monday, January 12, 1998 - 09:52 pm: |
what a bunch of crap. when i worked at tower records rich snooty sorts would tromp in and proudly ask for "NYMAN!" expecting no one in the place to have ever heard of the guy. same thing happened a lot with Schnittke. and Schumann (snobs are such a riot). have not listened to this in a while. its insipidness grows over time. |
By Dave on Monday, January 12, 1998 - 10:12 pm: |
Would you recommend a few selections to me? I like simple stuff. By that I mean four or less players. I enjoy (don't fall asleep) The Well-Tempered Clavier, Chopin's Nocturnes, Sor's guitar stuff, baroque Italian stuff (The Devil's Trill. . .). Any suggestions? |
By Sorabji on Monday, January 12, 1998 - 10:47 pm: |
If you want simple stuff with balls I think you might try Saint-Säens' better pieces. The Introduction and Rondo a Capriccioso is, to me, a tight and insanely fascinating score. Such vacuousness and still such passion trapped in one place. And the 2nd Piano Concerto strikes me the same way. I have a great Rubinstein recording of that piece around here somewhere. Guess neither of these is 4 or less players. Hmmm. The Brahms Handel Variations (Op. 24) have given me endless hours of listening. Offhand, though I can not recommend any particular recording. I own Jorge Bolet and Egon Petri's recordings of this score but neither one is really satisfactory. Oh, and you know what pieces have always fascinated me are the 6 Paganini/Liszt Études for piano, much in the same way that Saint-Säens interests me. Such exalted coldness. Back to more than 4 players, I think Ravel's G Major Piano Concerto might suit you, as might any of Alicia De La Rocha's Spanish piano music records. For some reason right now the composers' names escape me. One final recommendation, Schubert's Trout Quintet. That thing by itself will give you a lifetime of stuff to listen to. |
By Jicotea on Tuesday, January 13, 1998 - 05:56 pm: |
Now, when did Schumann join the snob repertoire? What's the matter, Mark, has something of his busted your chops lately? There are ways (as I'm sure you know) in which Schumann's major works are more difficult than l the mostly vacuous flashy pieces of Alkan, Tausig, Liszt, Kalkbrenner, and other keyboard-fressers TNTM. Rustle of Spring. Gack. No defense or even excuse for diatonic drivel of Nyman. Schnittke was interesting until he started to recycle himself. He's a very unwell man, likely going to be dead (personally, not in terms of fashion) too soon for comfort. Neither one merits being lumped with Schumann. If you're going to play guru, watch out, the peanut gallerys' eyes are on you, and ears likewise. |
By Sorabji on Tuesday, January 13, 1998 - 08:12 pm: |
i guess it works both ways, though. People being protective or defensive of their "knowledge." One scene which forever sticks in my mind is when the CD we were playing in the store was Hymn to the Sun God, by Philip Glass. 3 elderly women approached me with a supplicant look about them, and one of them said "Who wrote this? It is absolutely beautiful," and the other women seemed to agree. I told them it was from an opera by Philip Glass and the instant they heard that name their collective demeanor completely changed. They became positively angry and their facial expressions looked as if a vile stench had wafted through. Needless to say they didn't find it beautiful any more. i'm going to the square to get really drunk tonight. don't miss me too much. and by the way, i'm not a guru. i'm just hanging out. |
By Amanda on Tuesday, January 13, 1998 - 08:35 pm: |
'drunken ramblings' when you get back... unless you have too much fun and never come home.. |
By Nelly on Tuesday, January 13, 1998 - 09:59 pm: |
|
By Jicotea on Tuesday, January 13, 1998 - 11:41 pm: |
Nelly: Jeez, no, it wasn't Schumann's obscurity in question, it was some snob value I thought Mark was imputing to his music. Right on with "The Jolly Farmer." Can't say about Oz, becuz I wuz a tiny chile when I saw it and didn't know from Schumann. |
By Nelly on Wednesday, January 14, 1998 - 12:39 am: |
Gee, I used to know that film so well. I think it was the Harold Arlen score that I was most crazy about. I watched it on TV every year, and got so I would play it back in my mind before I went to sleep. Speaking of childhood and for those who don't think they remember the Happy Farmer, there's a delightful Realaudio version on this page that will send you back... Past my bedtime. "Poppies...poppies will make them sleep...now they'll sleep..." |
By Dave on Wednesday, January 14, 1998 - 01:35 am: |
Thanks, I've printed your post. I hope I can find some of this at the local library. Thanks again. Are you strictly classical? Do you follow any other genres? |
By Nelly slightly more enlightened or confused one on Saturday, February 21, 1998 - 09:07 pm: |
I was visiting some old links, discovered that interesting little paper in Mobile, Alabama, The Harbinger, has a "Modern Composer" column, and the latest one reviews a recording that includes a piece by the American composer William Schuman (one n). I now have a faint recollection of encountering his name before and noticing the distinction between him and Robert Schumann (2 n's, husband of Clara Schumann and composer of The Happy Farmern...) but I had forgotten it before. I have a strong suspicion it is the one-n Schuman that snobbish customers thought they were asking sorabji for... Anyway, this educational trail led further and ultimately led to my ordering a CD of something else that includes him... I've got to stop doing that or eventually stop eating... |
By Sorabji on Saturday, February 21, 1998 - 11:52 pm: |
i had a long, blistering phone conversation with william shuman once. bill schuman wrote all those gassy symphonies. he was a good man. hard to find. and vice-versa, or so i'm told. those people at tower actually asked for "R-O-B-E-R-T- S-C-H-U-M-A-N-N." i just left off the R-O-B-E-R-T for savings. |