I found it on http://www.thememoryhole.org who plucked it from http://www.AirDisaster.com As horrifying as it is, to hear the hijackers voices as they announce to the passengers, i think its important we have access to these tapes. |
|
war for xmas. ahhhhhhhhhhh |
more likely late november. |
i don't doubt they'll start air raids much sooner. im just speaking of troops, on the ground, in a hostile, desert environment facing an adversary who will use chemical weapons and the ideal time for such a movement. |
Disclaimer: The views demonstrated by this lawful protestor, who shows his feelings toward the media outside the Federal Court House in Buffalo, New York September 18, 2002, where he sat to show his support for the six local suspected al-Qaida supporters who appeared inside the court, September 18, 2002, do not necessarily reflect the views of this poster. |
|
Like that Blair guy. |
Maybe the world is going to end in a bang. |
|
Everything they find says "Made in the USA". Did you see John Stewarts take on Rumsfeld testifying before Congress last night? God damn that hard-ass/machine man is a proving ground for satire. You'd think his balls were made of plutonium. |
Senate Republican leader Trent Lott, R-Miss., said both the House and Senate might vote on the resolution as early as the first week of October, plenty of time before lawmakers go home to campaign for midterm elections. Lott said lawmakers would review the president's proposal over the weekend, but "I'm perfectly happy with the language." The White House's erstwhile nemesis, Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, D-S.D., agreed with Lott that "there is absolutely no difference of opinion with regard to the threat that Saddam Hussein poses and the need to address that threat in a multitude of ways." Daschle added that Democrats wanted some changes in the wording of the proposal, but were confident a broad consensus could be reached. The resolution the president presented to Congress would give him broad war-making authority similar to what Congress gave his father, George H.W. Bush, in 1991 before the start of the Gulf War. As drafted, it would authorize him to use force unilaterally if he deemed necessary, without waiting for the United Nations to act. It reads: "The president is authorized to use all means that he determines to be appropriate, including force, in order to enforce the United Nations Security Council resolutions, defend the national security interests of the United States against the threat posed by Iraq, and restore international peace and security in the region." "It looks pretty straightforward to me," said Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz. "It will pass overwhelmingly." The Bush proposal also made clear that the president is intent on bringing about the downfall of Saddam, pointing out that Congress in 1998, under President Clinton, had approved a policy "to support efforts to remove from power the current Iraqi regime and promote the emergence of a democratic government to replace that regime." It states that the Iraqi government "remains in material and unacceptable breach of its international obligations" by possessing chemical and biological weapons capability, seeking nuclear weapons, supporting terrorists and repressing its own people." ****** Source:AP Ladies and gentlemen, I give you Armageddon. I honestly believe that if Sadam feels like he is about to be ousted, he will initiate a "Scorched Earth" response. |
Might be sort of hard with all those bunker busters going off all around him. Of course, using those, it might be a race to see who can scorch the most earth the fastest! Winner gets a blue ribbon. |
Sing it, everyone! |
only one of my three nitwits is appears opposed to action, that is Diane Feinstein. Its odd because she is usually doing the wrong thing. |
