This weekend


sorabji.com: The Stalking Post: This weekend
By Kebron on Monday, October 20, 2003 - 03:56 pm:

    I just spent this weekend at a place called Spirit Haven. This weekend we in an organization named Council of the Magickal Arts this is the website www.magickal-arts.org/. The purpose was for the Samhain festival (pronounced sowinn). At Samhain festival we had many workshops which were of course pagan based. We had many rituals and a few handfastings. This was a great time for those of us who want to celebrate our beliefs to do so in our own way without interference from others that refuse to accept our thoughts and practices. We were in a place that is away from the general public and far out in the country. The most common concept is to enter in perfect love and perfect trust. It was awesome

    P.S. There was also very much partying in the evenings.


By Nate on Monday, October 20, 2003 - 04:01 pm:

    i'd pronounce it sown, like clown.


By Kebron on Monday, October 20, 2003 - 04:11 pm:

    This is a website that could really help you learn some info on the different pagan holidays along with proper pronunciation. www.wiccan.com/samhain.html


By spunky on Monday, October 20, 2003 - 04:14 pm:


By patrick on Monday, October 20, 2003 - 04:27 pm:

    what kind of refreshments do they serve at these kinds of shindigs?


By Nate on Monday, October 20, 2003 - 04:27 pm:

    it was a celtic pagan holiday before it was a wiccan holiday, nuge.

    and the shield is lowered on oct.31/nov.1.


By spunky on Monday, October 20, 2003 - 04:33 pm:

    The most well known aspect of Samhain is it's role as the Feast of the Dead.


By Spider on Monday, October 20, 2003 - 05:11 pm:

    Even after Christianity came to Ireland (well afterwards, actually) it was still believed that the veil between this world and the other one is thinnest on October 31 and April 30.


By eri on Monday, October 20, 2003 - 05:38 pm:

    "what kind of refreshments do they serve at these kinds of shindigs?"

    hehehhehe....you will have to ask Kebron about Pooh camp......after all, he is the official fishbowl bitch, and proclaimed the best fishbowl bitch ever :p


By sarah on Monday, October 20, 2003 - 05:38 pm:


    i like to celebrate Samhain by going to a party dressed up as Hello Kitty and doing tequilla jello shots with a bunch of other adults also dressed up in stupid costumes.




By TBone on Monday, October 20, 2003 - 06:40 pm:

    I always wish I could dress up as inanimate things like a briefcase or dental floss.
    .
    I just can't figure out how to make it work though.
    .
    I might have to go as the pumaman.


By sarah on Monday, October 20, 2003 - 06:43 pm:


    once i went as a Rubik's Cube.




By TBone on Monday, October 20, 2003 - 06:49 pm:

    That is so cool. That's a good idea.
    Were you functional?


By patrick on Monday, October 20, 2003 - 07:05 pm:

    angry sam once went as "Forgotten Things" he covered himself in cobwebs, broken glasses, a holey flannel shirt, one shoe, and a few post-it notes on himself.

    i heard a good idea over the weekend.

    Duffman.

    I don't know what Im going to do. Nothing scary as I dont want to freak out the kid.


By Lapis on Monday, October 20, 2003 - 07:10 pm:

    I've got wings now. but they're apparently made for children and my shoulders hide the bulk.

    Must go through the suitcase.


By Rowlf on Monday, October 20, 2003 - 09:08 pm:

    the poor pagan kid i knew in high school that got beat all the time pronounced Samhain as 'sah-when'

    ditto the Danzig obsessed record clerk downtown. I figure she would know.


By wisper on Monday, October 20, 2003 - 10:19 pm:

    patrick-
    kids that little have a concept of fear? i always thought that they seem to get scared at random, usually just from things that are really big or loud noises. Do they really get freaked by "scary" things, like, i dunno, the Alien action figure on my comp monitor? or weird things like Mr.Potatoe head?

    it's so interesting!

    I thought it would be a good idea for people with babies to get rid of all the baby-ish stuff in the kids room and put monster pictures and fake spiders everywhere, and then the child would be immune to regular little-kid fears of monsters n' such.


    also, while i'm on the subject, do infants truly "like" certain things? Blues Clues over Whinne the Pooh or Barney? Do they even notice?



By sarah on Tuesday, October 21, 2003 - 12:35 pm:

    unfortunately no, not a functional Rubik's Cube. that would be quite an engineering feat, something i imagine someone at burning man would put together. mine was just a big square box with holes punched in it for the head, arms and feet. each side was painted a different color in a 3x3 grid.


    this was back in 1981.



    my favorite halloween costume of all time was a skeleton costume my mom handmade for me on request when i was seven years old.



By heather on Tuesday, October 21, 2003 - 01:32 pm:

    i would like at least one time to have and fulfill
    a costume idea that i like.

    this weekend is a girly sleepover and a
    halloween party and god knows what else.


By Kebron on Tuesday, October 21, 2003 - 01:33 pm:

    Ok the pronunciation is not the important thing I guess, as long as others know what you are talking about. As far as refreshments one of the most common things is Meade. then there are different drinks for whatever ritual you might be having. When the scheduled events are over then is the fire time and after that the fishbowl is filled.

    MMMMM fishbowl
    K


By semillama on Tuesday, October 21, 2003 - 01:37 pm:

    Mead is good. Sometimes I get presents of Mead from mavis.


By Kebron on Tuesday, October 21, 2003 - 01:46 pm:

    Yes Meade very goooood


By sarah on Tuesday, October 21, 2003 - 01:51 pm:


    now i'm horny.




By dave. on Tuesday, October 21, 2003 - 02:12 pm:

    why is it that only women (and perhaps, nate) can say that and it's not icky?

    that's rhetorical, btw.


By patrick on Tuesday, October 21, 2003 - 02:39 pm:

    there's no such thing as rhetorical here.

    i have some ideas for you but I won't bother.


By heather on Tuesday, October 21, 2003 - 02:59 pm:

    what was it, though?

    the mead, the rituals, the fishbowl?


    libraries make me...well, you know


By sarah on Tuesday, October 21, 2003 - 05:34 pm:


    not. going. there.






    hee!




By agatha on Wednesday, October 22, 2003 - 11:51 am:

    me, too!


By moonit on Thursday, October 23, 2003 - 01:39 am:

    i have a thing about mechanics. i think its the grease.


By patrick on Thursday, October 23, 2003 - 12:48 pm:

    i have a thing for stuffy older office hens.


    something about the panty hose. not the hose itself, but the fact that they feel its necessary to wear. the idea of ripping it would make me feel like a liberator.


By Spider on Thursday, October 23, 2003 - 12:57 pm:

    I have a thing for Old-West fire-and-brimstone preachers. I think it's their fire (brimstone optional) and the combination of Good and Scary.


By V.v. on Thursday, October 23, 2003 - 11:09 pm:

    I will allways preach the merits of Witchcraft,and im scary enough for most people.A Rasputin in a suit.


By V.v. on Thursday, October 23, 2003 - 11:21 pm:

    Kebron,my respect to you and Lady Bless...


By Kebron on Wednesday, October 29, 2003 - 01:30 pm:

    Merry Meet

    Ok sorry I have been gone for so long but here I am. Preaching the merits of witchcraft is great. Hopefully when you do this it will be done in a manner that as you speak to those who are "jesus freaks" and think of us as satan worshipers will go away from the discussion with the understanding that we are not evil and do not mean harm to anyone or anything. There was once a person that I spoke with who told me that when the end comes (meaning "the return of jesus") that I would drop my Pagan books and go back to the bible. This is the same mentality of a person who told me that he thinks Pagans are horrible because of their animal sacrifices. After about thirty minutes of talking to this person trying to help him understand that all life no matter what form is to be respected by Pagans. He still insisted that he saw a Pagan ritual where an animal was killed. With that I hope that all discussions that anyone has about Pagans is friendly and sheds light on others about our beliefs so that they will not be so quick to judge. Hope this makes sense to all.

    K


By kazu on Wednesday, October 29, 2003 - 01:33 pm:

    The witches and pagans were in the closet killing babies and I saw one of the babies and the baby looked at me


By dave. on Wednesday, October 29, 2003 - 01:37 pm:

    hee.


By Kebron on Wednesday, October 29, 2003 - 01:51 pm:

    And then the baby started ripping at your eyes


By Spider on Wednesday, October 29, 2003 - 02:03 pm:

    When I was exploring Wicca about 10 years ago, I thought a lot about the "end times" and what would happen to me if the Second Coming occurred. I believed that every religion was a valid way of approaching the same life-force and that you just gravitated toward the one that fit with you best, so it was perfectly acceptable to me to think that the Second Coming could occur while I was not Christian.

    One night I had a dream about a little white-haired boy being the Messiah, and the Holy Grail being a glass soda bottle with no label and filled with Coke, and a strong earthquake hitting which caused me to seek refuge in a neighborhood grocery store. On the floor in the store was a large pentagram, which I kneeled on for protection, but the earthquake kept causing me to slide off the symbol. When the earthquake was over, I went outside and there were crosses spinning in the air, and I knew they were visible from any point in the world. Men and women whom I knew to be characters from the bible were walking throughout the neighborhood, and I sat down on someone's porch swing with a few of these people. Water came and filled up by our feet, so it was as though we were swinging above a huge ocean, and there were squids and other fish in the water trying to bite our legs.

    Anyway, the dream told me that my heart wasn't at peace with Wicca and that I should return to Christianity.

    Incidentally, the scarily hardcore Catholic mother of a friend of mine also once had a dream about the Second Coming that featured a huge ocean and fish trying to bite her feet. I think in her dream, the fish swam into the wounds they had caused and sealed themselves up in people's skins.

    Anyway, if there's a global flood and fish try to bite you....well, you heard it prophesied here first.


By Nate on Wednesday, October 29, 2003 - 02:15 pm:

    i so adore the true sorabjiites.


By patrick on Wednesday, October 29, 2003 - 02:37 pm:

    thats a helluva dream


    whats a "true sorabjiite" ?



By dave. on Wednesday, October 29, 2003 - 02:38 pm:

    the spinning crosses in the air part sounds rad. were they like distributed equidistantly all over the globe?


By spunky on Wednesday, October 29, 2003 - 02:44 pm:

    I have a problem with any religion that includes a diety.


By spunky on Wednesday, October 29, 2003 - 02:49 pm:

    by the way:

    By Christian definition (not mine), if you worship anything/one other then the God of the Bible, you are worshiping Satan. Period. There is no give in that definition. It is black and white.
    it does not matter if it is an idol, a goddess, or whatever. Not God of Abraham and Isaac, Not Son of God, not part of the Holy Trinity, then it is Satan.
    There are groups of them that even include Catholics in that group because you pray to Mary, and have too many symbols, too deep into symbolism. Most even beleive a cross is wrong, because you begin to deify that instead of Christ.
    According to Christian belief.


By Cletus on Wednesday, October 29, 2003 - 02:51 pm:

    see here i hava maaajur isha's wit r'ligun thet mess wit ma diet.

    don be tellin ma dis furry thing isa sacred an thisa one isnt. i'll fry em boff up


By Spider on Wednesday, October 29, 2003 - 02:53 pm:

    Dave, I don't know. I somehow knew that everywhere in the world, you could look up and see those crosses spinning. The crosses were, like, lying on their backs in the air and spinning like Chinese stars. But slowly.


By semillama on Wednesday, October 29, 2003 - 02:58 pm:

    Spunky, of course you mean "According to ONE Christian GROUP's belief." Right?


By spunky on Wednesday, October 29, 2003 - 03:11 pm:

    wrong


By Spider on Wednesday, October 29, 2003 - 03:15 pm:

    No, right. Catholics don't believe that.

    *******************
    This is why the document on the relations between the Church and Hinduism and other religions of the Far East is so important. We read: "In Hinduism men explore the divine mystery and express it through an endless bounty of myths and through penetrating philosophical insight. They seek freedom from the anguish of our human condition, either by way of the ascetic life, profound meditation, or by taking refuge in God with love and trust. The various schools of Buddhism recognize the radical inadequacy of this malleable world and teach a way by which men, with devout and trusting hearts, can become capable either of reaching a state of perfect liberation, or of attaining, by their own efforts or through higher help, supreme illumination" (Nostra Aetate 2). Further along, the Council remarks that "The Catholic Church rejects nothing that is true and holy in these religions." The Church has a high regard for their conduct and way of life, for those precepts and doctrines which, although differing on many points from that which the Church believes and propounds, often reflect a ray of that truth which enlightens all men. However, the Church proclaims, and is bound to proclaim that Christ is 'the way and the truth and the life' [Jn 14:6], in whom men must find the fullness of religious life and in whom God has reconciled everything to Himself" (Nostra Aetate 2). The words of the Council recall the conviction, long rooted in the Tradition, of the existence of the so-called semina Verbi (seeds of the Word), present in all religions.

    *************

    --Pope John Paul II, Crossing the Threshold of Hope


By spunky on Wednesday, October 29, 2003 - 04:37 pm:

    Ahem.

    "Spunky, of course you mean "According to ONE Christian GROUP's belief." Right? "

    "wrong."

    There are, to my knowledge more then ONE christian Group that beleives there is only one true God, and all the rest are cults, regardless of what these other groups choose to call themselves.

    Southern Baptists, Pentacostal, Full Gospel, Assembly of God, Mormon's, World Wide Church of God, RLDS, Jehova's Witnesses, and, my personal favorite, Seventh Day Adventists.


By Nate on Wednesday, October 29, 2003 - 04:44 pm:

    spunk,

    what sem said means, not all christians believe that.

    one christian group, as in, a christian group that is defined as a group by one critera: that belief.

    that would leave another christian group that didn't believe that, such as, as spider pointed out, the O.C.'s, the original christians.

    what you've done is ignored the intent of the statement and instead understood the literal word to mean either what you expected or what served you best.

    which is kind of funny.

    all things considered.


By spunky on Wednesday, October 29, 2003 - 04:55 pm:

    i really dont care that much about the subject to debate it.


By patrick on Wednesday, October 29, 2003 - 05:03 pm:

    now THATS funny.


By Spider on Wednesday, October 29, 2003 - 05:04 pm:

    Jeez, would it kill you to say, "Whoops, misunderstood the question, sorry about that"?

    So much grief would be averted if the **1)Spunky makes a statement, 2) Someone directly and unequivocally refutes that statement, 3) Spunky ignores the refutation/denies the original statement/attempts to distract the responder** pattern were broken.


By TBone on Wednesday, October 29, 2003 - 05:07 pm:

    It's just semantics.
    .
    I need to start writing my dreams down.
    .


By spunky on Wednesday, October 29, 2003 - 05:09 pm:

    Oh crap, people.


    Alrighty then, here we go.


    IF you beleive there is more then one God, more then the God who sent his only son jesus christ to die on the cross to take your sins and rose again on the third day and is now setting at the right hand of God, if you do not beleive that He is the only one,

    Then you are NOT a Christian, so you would not be concidered a part of that Christian group. YOu deceve yourselves.

    Sorry, that is the way it is.

    No, I no longer subscribe to that theology, but I did study it and had it forced down my throat for 18 years and even preached in front of a congregration on several occasions. I know how they think.


    And just because someone says something that contradicts me, that does not mean they have refuted my argument or proven it wrong in any way shape or form.


By patrick on Wednesday, October 29, 2003 - 05:21 pm:

    you had one brand shoved down your throat (very successfully apparently)

    WAHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOoo


By Spider on Wednesday, October 29, 2003 - 05:23 pm:

    What the hell.

    No one is saying if you worship Ba'al or Brahma Shiva and Vishnu, you can still call yourself Christian.

    Okay?

    You did not even start out by saying that.

    Okay?

    You said, "By Christian definition (not mine), if you worship anything/one other then the God of the Bible, you are worshiping Satan."

    I provided an example of a Christian perspective that says (paraphrasing) there is good in other religions, and quoting, "The Catholic Church rejects nothing that is true and holy in these religions."

    Okay? Notice the absence of accusing Hindus and Buddhists of being Satan worshippers?

    OF COURSE if you're Hindu, you're not Christian. I say again, what the hell? Who is saying that you are?

    Seriously. Reading comprehension. Look into it.


    And yes, if someone provides factual evidence the contradicts a statement you've made, they have refuted your argument.


By Nate on Wednesday, October 29, 2003 - 05:24 pm:

    an offshoot of the original christian church says that the original christian church is not christian, therefore the original christian church is not christian.

    that is your argument, spunk.


By kazu on Wednesday, October 29, 2003 - 05:24 pm:

    She jumpes a record breaking 100 feet into the air above his head to grab and bring back the point:

    That you can be Christian, but still respect other religions and not write them off as evil satan worishiping baby killing pagan witches.


By semillama on Wednesday, October 29, 2003 - 05:31 pm:

    Spunky, I think it might help you to try writing your posts in English prime. I think that it would reduce the amount of misunderstanding that seems to occur between yourself and others.


By spunky on Wednesday, October 29, 2003 - 05:34 pm:

    "That you can be Christian, but still respect other religions and not write them off as evil satan worishiping baby killing pagan witches."

    And my point was:

    You cannot.


    Hey, food for thought, who's hungry?











    why do i no longer attribute myself to the christian groups?
















    answer: they are wrong. so are any other religions that are based on a man-made diety.


By Spider on Wednesday, October 29, 2003 - 05:40 pm:

    Jesus, Mary, and Joseph, Spunky.

    I'm sorry that you have been hoodwinked into thinking all Christians believe you either worship Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior or you are doomed to burn in a fiery pit for all eternity, but that is not true.

    I'll say it again for you since you're having trouble reading today: That. Is. Not. True.

    Many Christians DO NOT believe that. They believe that YOU CAN believe in something other than Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior, and you will NOT burn in a fiery pit. It's OKAY that you believe in another diety or dieties.

    Did you even read what I quoted from the Pope up there. No, probably not.

    Go, read it. Synthesize its meaning. Understand. Comprehend. You'll learn something.


By patrick on Wednesday, October 29, 2003 - 05:42 pm:

    spunk.

    please.





    you're upsetting spider.




By Spider on Wednesday, October 29, 2003 - 05:49 pm:

    Look, I'll just say it: It irritates the living fuck out of me when Spunky does not acknowledge people's responses to his incorrect statements.

    It's like this:

    Spunky: All women are blonde.

    Person X: No, they're not. I'm a woman and I have brown hair. Look, here are five pictures of me. You can see my brown hair. Hell, here, I'm mailing you a lock of my hair so you can see the dark color. And here, this is an ultrasound I had done on my uterus, so you can see I'm a woman.

    Spunky: ....Yep, women. They're blonde, all right.


    GAAAHHH.


By spunky on Wednesday, October 29, 2003 - 06:01 pm:

    Hmmmmmmmmm


    maybe I need to explain (i thought I did this already).

    "I'm sorry that you have been hoodwinked into thinking all Christians believe you either worship Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior or you are doomed to burn in a fiery pit for all eternity, but that is not true.

    I'll say it again for you since you're having trouble reading today: That. Is. Not. True.

    Many Christians DO NOT believe that. They believe that YOU CAN believe in something other than Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior, and you will NOT burn in a fiery pit. It's OKAY that you believe in another diety or dieties. "

    I never denied that there are groups that choose to beleive they are christians that think other god's are OK, but by biblical definition, they are not christians.


By semillama on Wednesday, October 29, 2003 - 06:10 pm:

    Again, not accurate. only by certain christian groups interpretation of the english translation of the bible, are the other folks not christian.


By spunky on Wednesday, October 29, 2003 - 06:11 pm:

    The Nicene Creed

    Anglican Church, 325 AD

    We believe in one God,
    the Father, the Almighty,
    maker of heaven and earth,
    of all that is, seen and unseen.
    We believe in one Lord, Jesus Christ,
    the only Son of God,
    eternally begotten of the Father,
    God from God, light from light,
    true God from true God,
    begotten, not made,
    of one Being with the Father;
    through him all things were made.
    For us and for our salvation
    he came down from heaven,
    was incarnate of the Holy Spirit and the Virgin Mary
    and became truly human.
    For our sake he was crucified under Pontius Pilate;
    he suffered death and was buried.
    On the third day he rose again
    in accordance with the Scriptures;
    he ascended into heaven
    and is seated at the right hand of the Father.
    He will come again in glory to judge the living and the dead,
    and his kingdom will have no end.

    We believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the giver of life,
    who proceeds from the Father [and the Son],
    who with the Father and the Son is worshiped and glorified,
    who has spoken through the prophets.
    We believe in one holy catholic and apostolic Church.
    We acknowledge one baptism for the forgiveness of sins.
    We look for the resurrection of the dead,
    and the life of the world to come. Amen.



    **************************************************

    That is the definintion I am applying here.

    I do ascribe to that, but this creed defines what I was taught a Christian was.


By kazu on Wednesday, October 29, 2003 - 06:12 pm:

    Jesus wasn't a Christian.


By spunky on Wednesday, October 29, 2003 - 06:12 pm:

    I meant to say I do NOT acribe to that


By kazu on Wednesday, October 29, 2003 - 06:17 pm:

    "but by biblical definition they are not christians"

    "The Nicene Creed...That is the definintion I am applying here"

    Is that definition in the bible? I can't find it.


By kazu on Wednesday, October 29, 2003 - 06:32 pm:

    as far as I am concerned the Nicene Creed is a summary/interpretation of biblical events.

    oh kazu i am heartfully sorry for all of my spins because they displease you who are hot shit and deserving of all my love and with your help I will spin no more


By TBone on Wednesday, October 29, 2003 - 06:53 pm:

    I get it. Spunky is talking about Fundamental Christians.
    .
    Still semantics, and still unwilling to admit admit misstatements.
    .
    I wish to make an amendment to Spider's excellent parody.
    .
    Spunky: All women are blonde.
    Person X: No, they're not. I'm a woman and I have brown hair. Look, here are five pictures of me. You can see my brown hair.
    Hell, here, I'm mailing you a lock of my hair so you can see the dark color. And here, this is an ultrasound I had done on my
    uterus, so you can see I'm a woman.
    Spunky: There are too blonde women. I've seen them.
    Person X: Yes, some women are blonde.
    Spunky: That's what I'm saying. Women. Blonde. Yellow hair.
    Person X: But not all of them.
    Spunky: Well a woman has to be blonde or not. She either is or isn't.
    Person X: True, except when women color their hair in stripes or something. But not all women are blonde.
    Spunky: Women who dye their hair don't count. They refuse to accept the hair color they were given and expect to be given a hair color they didn't earn.
    Person X: That's beside the point. I take it somehow you've never seen a woman with naturally brown hair? Or black?
    Spunky: I never said that. Next you'll accuse me of dying my own hair. Like I said before, hair dye doesn't change a person's natural hair color.
    ...


By Lapis on Wednesday, October 29, 2003 - 10:15 pm:

    The Anglican Church didn't exist for another 1200 years, Spunky.

    I don't like your attitude about religion. Here's a healthier way to think about things:
    (1) It doesn't matter what religion or sect you follow be it Activism, Christianity, Hinduism, Islam, Shamanism, Buddhism, Judaism, Paganism, Shintoism, Science (the religion of the Athiests) or Agnosticism. None of them are absolutely concrete, so in essence, they can all be true or all be false. It doesn't matter.
    (2) What does matter is respect. For yourself, for others, for the environment.

    A conversation with my little sister:
    She: "Christians are the chosen ones. By being good and introducing people to the love of Jesus Christ, they become Christian and are chosen for heaven."
    Me: "What about Jews?"
    She: "Oh, they're the chosen ones too."


By wisper on Wednesday, October 29, 2003 - 10:36 pm:

    dudes, the spunkinator is just saying that there are many Christians that think all non-christians are going to hell, and they also think that any "christian" who thinks otherwise is also going to hell, and should not be called a christian.
    And the bible would seem to agree with this idea.


    jeez.


By agatha on Wednesday, October 29, 2003 - 10:43 pm:

    Droop?!


By TBone on Thursday, October 30, 2003 - 02:06 am:

    But he initially presented it as if ALL of them believed this, and that anyone who has different beliefs is not a christian.
    .
    Then instead of saying "yeah, I meant some, not all." he claimed to have been saying "some" from the getgo.
    .
    Subtle difference. Just got blown out of proportion like everything else.
    .
    My version of spunk and person x I wrote earlier just seems mean now. Sorry.
    *sigh*


By Spider on Thursday, October 30, 2003 - 09:55 am:

    Spunky, we Catholics recite the Nicene Creed every Sunday at Mass. I don't know what your point is in bringing that up.

    TBone, your amendment to my parody would be perfect if you threw in some statements about men having blue eyes and person X shrieking in agony, "What the fuck does that have to do with ANYTHING?"

    God. Enough of this.


By semillama on Thursday, October 30, 2003 - 09:58 am:

    What's this about droop?


By kazu on Thursday, October 30, 2003 - 10:09 am:

    Look, if Spunkem had just said from the beginning that he was referring to fundamentalist Christians then the conversation would have been very didn't.

    "I never denied that there are groups that choose to beleive they are christians that think other god's are OK, but by biblical definition, they are not christians."

    If you follow his logic then it shows that he still subscribes to that belief, that their interpretation of what is means to be Christian, that is the correct one and that Christians, who are more flexible, but still hold up the bible as their authority would still be wrong.

    Which leads me to think that he hasn't fully extricated yourself from the fundamentalist thinking that he grew up with.

    Spunky, you have the right to feel/think whatever you want about religion, but your blind dismissal of all man-made diety based religions as just wrong because they just are mirrors that of the fundamentalists and proves the point I just made.


By kazu on Thursday, October 30, 2003 - 10:12 am:

    "the conversation would have been very didn't."

    ouch. bad kazu. bad. bad.


By kazu on Thursday, October 30, 2003 - 10:18 am:

    holy shit, there are just grammar mistakes all over that post.

    see, this is what happens when I don't proofread.

    "oh yeah I can type and post without fretting... watch, i'll do it right now, see, look I just wrote and posted...see see see...oh shit, what was I thinking, oh my god everyone is going to hate me now."


By sarah on Thursday, October 30, 2003 - 10:24 am:


    i'd like to interrupt this debate briefly to say:

    can you please keep jesus out of this?

    for fucks sake, if he had any idea how convoluted his message has become... the religion of christianity has very little to do with the ideas, themes, and beliefs about which jesus the human being was reported to speak.

    not one single time in the New Testament was Jesus reported as saying "I am the Son of God". what jesus was reported as saying is "We are all children of God." he spoke of a way of living and treating other human beings and the earth in a way that is almost entirely NOT reflected in the doctrine of the christian (catholic or protestant or otherwise) church.



By sarah on Thursday, October 30, 2003 - 10:25 am:


    also: i think wicca is cute. so are wiccans.




By semillama on Thursday, October 30, 2003 - 10:31 am:

    no one is actually talking about Jesus, just his various fan clubs.


By kazu on Thursday, October 30, 2003 - 10:36 am:

    When did we ever bring Jesus into it? There was my my crack about Jesus not being Christian, which was just silly (even if it's true). By why keep him out? I agree with what you said, but the way that Spunky's definition of Christianity cites Jesus as the son of god is perfectly relevant because we were talking about Christian groups and they do believe certain things about jesus


By Spider on Thursday, October 30, 2003 - 10:36 am:

    Actually, Sarah, that's not true. Jesus made many references to "his Father," meaning God --

    Matthew 11:27
    "All things have been handed over to Me by My Father; and no one knows the Son except the Father; nor does anyone know the Father except the Son, and anyone to whom the Son wills to reveal Him."

    John 6:40
    "For this is the will of My Father, that everyone who beholds the Son and believes in Him will have eternal life, and I Myself will raise him up on the last day."


    Though, Jesus also made many statements saying God is everyone's father --

    Matthew 6:6
    "But you, when you pray, go into your inner room, close your door and pray to your Father who is in secret, and your Father who sees what is done in secret will reward you."

    Matthew 6:26
    "Look at the birds of the air, that they do not sow, nor reap nor gather into barns, and yet your heavenly Father feeds them. Are you not worth much more than they?


By sarah on Thursday, October 30, 2003 - 10:46 am:


    again spider, in none of those above versus did jesus say I Am The Son Of God. nor does he expressly say that "The Father" or "My Father" equals "God".

    where is the definition for what was translated into "heavenly Father"?

    did Jesus speak in Capital Letters?








By sarah on Thursday, October 30, 2003 - 10:51 am:


    i've said it before... Christianity is the most successful pyramid marketing scheme in all history. and they're not even selling any tangible product! it's an economic anomoly!




By Skooter on Thursday, October 30, 2003 - 11:02 am:

    It's pronounced "Sew-ween". Any one who follows the teaching of Christ can claim to be a Christian, but it's much harder to live out his example. The world would be a better place if those who claim it actually lived it.


By Spider on Thursday, October 30, 2003 - 11:03 am:

    No, but he all but says "I am the Son of God." He calls himself the son and he calls God his father -- I don't know how much more explicit you can get. The context of John 6:40 is the last supper and the establishment of the eucharist --

    John 6:32-38
    *********************
    Jesus then said to them, "Truly, truly, I say to you, it is not Moses who has given you the bread out of heaven, but it is My Father who gives you the true bread out of heaven. For the bread of God is that which comes down out of heaven, and gives life to the world."

    Then they said to Him, "Lord, always give us this bread."

    Jesus said to them, "I am the bread of life; he who comes to Me will not hunger, and he who believes in Me will never thirst. But I said to you that you have seen Me, and yet do not believe.
    All that the Father gives Me will come to Me, and the one who comes to Me I will certainly not cast out. For I have come down from heaven, not to do My own will, but the will of Him who sent Me."
    ***************

    I don't see any ambiguity there.


By Dougie on Thursday, October 30, 2003 - 11:22 am:

    ACCORDING TO SCHOLARS, JESUS SPOKE IN ARAMAIC CAPITAL LETTERS, AND SHOUTED A LOT, FOR LACK OF MEGAPHONES BACK THEN.


By sarah on Thursday, October 30, 2003 - 11:28 am:


    right, i can call god my father, and i can refer to myself as The Daughter of My Father, but that does not mean that i consider myself the actual daughter of "God".

    and bread? bread from heaven? did jesus want people to think that every person literally would never have the sensation of actual hunger or actual thirst, that if everyone "went" to jesus, that they would be fed and watered?

    i don't see any ambiguity here either: the man was speaking in metaphor. unless you think he meant actual loaves of bread from actual heaven.

    i mean honestly, it's like spunky taking everything literally, instead of interpreting the intended meaning. jesus wasn't speaking literally. read the words again:

    "All that the Father gives Me will come to Me, and the one who comes to Me I will certainly not cast out. For I have come down from heaven, not to do My own will, but the will of Him who sent Me."

    HUH? what the fuck is that supposed to mean? you want to break that down sentence by sentence? that to me is actually very, very embiguous. if Jesus meant to say I Am The Son Of God and unless you believe that I am the Son of God you will go to hell or live in hell, but if you believe that I am the son of God you will go to heaven or live in heaven, then why wasn't he ever reported as saying those words? what exactly is the will of Him who sent Him?






By spunky on Thursday, October 30, 2003 - 11:34 am:

    John 3:16

    "For God so loved the world that He gave His one and only Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish but have eternal life."

    IF you do not beleive that Jesus is the Son of God, then you have lost the key to salvation, for what power would his death on the cross have over your sins if He was not the Son of God, but rather a teacher? To marginalize who He is, is to marginelize what He did for you.


    That is what I remember about that particular subject.

    To not beleive that Jesus was the Son of God is to not be "saved".


By TBone on Thursday, October 30, 2003 - 11:37 am:

    AND HE STARTED ALL OF HIS SENTANCES WITH THE WORD AND.


By sarah on Thursday, October 30, 2003 - 11:38 am:


    ooops, sorry. i've inadvertently hijacked this thread.

    anyway, i don't think it's reasonable to say that all christians believe that anyone who doesn't believe that jesus was the son of god who died on the cross for their sins is either a) is going to hell or b)is worshipping satan. i also don't think that one has to believe those things in order to be considered a True Christian following the bible, or whatever creeds.


    but i don't believe any of the premises of the the Christian religion anyway. obviously.



By spunky on Thursday, October 30, 2003 - 11:38 am:

    "I Am the Way, the Truth, and the Life"

    Jesus Christ, John 14:6

    Luke 1:30
    And the angel said unto her, Fear not, Mary: for thou hast found favour with God.

    1:31
    And, behold, thou shalt conceive in thy womb, and bring forth a son, and shalt call his name JESUS.

    1:32
    He shall be great, and shall be called the Son of the Highest: and the Lord God shall give unto him the throne of his father David:


By sarah on Thursday, October 30, 2003 - 11:42 am:


    but jesus, he was a seriously righteous dude.



By Dougie on Thursday, October 30, 2003 - 11:44 am:

    I'm wondering who the Gideons are, and did they go to every room in this hotel I'm staying at and personally place a bible in every nightstand drawer? They must have some sort of Bible budget. Also, I've noticed that at Hilton hotels, in lieu of a Bible, they place Conrad Hitlon's autobiography. He spoke in English, but used capital letters only at the beginning of his sentences, and with proper names and places. He didn't need to shout as the megaphone had been invented in his lifetime.


By Dougie on Thursday, October 30, 2003 - 11:54 am:

    "i also don't think that one has to believe those things [that jesus was the son of god who died on the cross for their sins} in order to be considered a True Christian following the bible, or whatever creeds."

    Yeah, but if Christians don't believe those things, then Christianity kind of loses its reasons for being no?


By patrick on Thursday, October 30, 2003 - 12:21 pm:

    "the conversation would have been very didn't."


    see.


    i like that.

    it almost sounds kinda beat.


By kazu on Thursday, October 30, 2003 - 12:23 pm:

    Did anyone ever see the skit on SNL where all the dead rockstars form a band and jesus hears it and says, "when I first heard them, all I could say is OH MY DAD!"?


    It made me laugh. Anyway.


By Dougie on Thursday, October 30, 2003 - 12:32 pm:

    Are there any Christian sects out there that do away with the mystical (i.e., resurrection, life after death in heaven, believing that Jesus is the son of God rather than just a Jewish carpenter etc.) and just follow a WWJD type of living?


By Spider on Thursday, October 30, 2003 - 12:36 pm:

    I meant that there was no ambiguity about God = Father, Jesus = Son.

    Whatever. This is boring.


    Did anyone see "Angel" last night? The script was written by Ben Edlund, he of the Tick. There were some really cute lines, like this bad-assed demon sitting in a bathroom stall and calling out "Occupado!" when the door jiggles. Hee. Or this other demon coming to a Halloween party dressed as a human, complete with argyle vest and suburban dad catch phrases.


By sarah on Thursday, October 30, 2003 - 12:53 pm:

    "Yeah, but if Christians don't believe those things, then Christianity kind of loses its reasons for being no?"

    i don't know the answer to that question. but i look at it this way. i practice yoga even though i don't consider myself a yogi or believe in all the "religious" aspects of yoga. i think i also believe a lot about the way of life and faith and described by jesus, and many of the ways of life i try to practice are those prescribed by Christianity, but i'm definitely not a Christian.

    it's disappointing that you suddenly find religion a boring topic, spider.



By Nate on Thursday, October 30, 2003 - 12:59 pm:

    I am the Son of God.



    i say this because in 2000 years when everyone is worshiping me i don't want any confusion.


By spunky on Thursday, October 30, 2003 - 01:01 pm:

    after this i don't know if that is going to be too much of a concern.....


By Nate on Thursday, October 30, 2003 - 01:07 pm:

    Son of God washes down PB&J with a chug from the milk jug.


By sarah on Thursday, October 30, 2003 - 01:28 pm:

    in 2000 years? everyone is worshipping you RIGHT NOW. be careful with that peanut butter.



By eri on Thursday, October 30, 2003 - 01:33 pm:

    I am a wiccan, and yet I still enjoy some of the aspects of things I have learned through Christianity. I haven't changed all aspects of my thinking or changed my views on values or things like that because I have found a different religion that works for me. It's not like I woke up one day and decided I'm not a Christian but a Wiccan and then everything I believed in was different.

    The hardest part for me is the people who claim to be Christians and yet do absolutely nothing to follow "God's Plan", and don't read the bible, and don't try to live a respectable life. Who say one thing in the name of their religion and then go out and do the exact opposite. That drives me nuts.


By TBone on Thursday, October 30, 2003 - 01:40 pm:

    Nate, on the night he was betrayed, took bread with peanut butter and jelly, and when he had given thanks, he broke it and said, "This is my body, which shall be given up for you; do this in rememberance of me," In the same way, after supper to took the cup, saying, "This milk is the new covenant in my blood; do this, whenever you drink it, in rememberance of me."


By kazu on Thursday, October 30, 2003 - 01:43 pm:

    got nate's blood?


By The Watcher on Thursday, October 30, 2003 - 02:44 pm:

    I AM GOD.

    At least in my mind.

    Because, I am responsible for how I see the world. And, when I die that vision dies with me. Therefore the world dies with me. Therefore, I am GOD.

    So I shall never die.

    You may all now bow before me.

    Is the doctor here with my medication yet?


By Nate on Thursday, October 30, 2003 - 07:31 pm:

    i don't need worshipping right now.

    i need whore shipping.


By Mvs on Thursday, October 30, 2003 - 07:48 pm:

    thou art god


By TBone on Thursday, October 30, 2003 - 08:25 pm:

    Waiting is.


By Platypus on Thursday, October 30, 2003 - 11:21 pm:


By Nate on Friday, October 31, 2003 - 01:09 am:

    and this, unless you're spunky.


By spunky on Friday, October 31, 2003 - 08:33 am:

    where in the hell do you find this shit?


By sarah on Friday, October 31, 2003 - 10:07 am:


    heard about this yet?



By Dougie on Friday, October 31, 2003 - 11:44 am:

    That's already been done in Last Temptation of Christ. Wonder why they decided to trot out that story?


By Kebron on Friday, October 31, 2003 - 02:11 pm:

    Yeah Nate I will worship that


By The Watcher on Friday, October 31, 2003 - 02:48 pm:

    Platypus - great I'll check it out more when I get home.

    Nate - your really warped.

    Sarah - That is really weird.


By Nate on Friday, October 31, 2003 - 03:04 pm:

    I'M NOT WARPED YOU FUCKING ASSHOLE YOU FUCKING CUNT.


By The Watcher on Friday, October 31, 2003 - 04:12 pm:

    Of course you're warped.

    If you weren't you'd be in a mental institution someplace.

    Unless you're in one now and we don't know it yet.


By The Watcher on Saturday, November 1, 2003 - 02:34 am:


By The Watcher on Saturday, November 1, 2003 - 02:36 am:

    Yeah. It worked.