Goddamn hippie-stinking liberal media not bad for a weeks work. fucking liberal media. jesus christ people. where's my valium. i need a double dose today. |
http://play.rbn.com/?url=airam/airam/live/live.rm&proto=rtsp |
|
i linked that story above rowlfie dude |
|
|
Imagin a network newsman actually saying he thinks this war was the right thing to do. |
Hannity just so you know... |
Imagine |
nooseman |
Even if he accidently tells the truth, his intent was to mislead, so that counts, too. |
|
|
"The only thing [Kerry] seems consistent on is that, throughout the 19 years he was in the Senate, he voted to raise taxes consistently 350 times." FactCheck (non-partisan) skewers this: http://www.factcheck.org/article.aspx?docID=159 just one of well... hundreds What Hannity and some of these other pundits do is the say crazy shit you cant refute in 2 seconds. repeated enough times and it becomes true. another favorite: HANNITY: BBC, now we’re quoting the Brits, okay. SCOOBIE: He did a study and he found how Katherine Harris and Jeb Bush used the felony voter purge to get tens of thousands of eligible voters off the voter rolls and these people didn’t have access to any kind of ballot once they were at the polls— [HANNITY DISCONNECTS SCOOBIE] HANNITY: First of all, that’s untrue. It’s never been proven. It’s never even been alleged except by the real extreme left like yourself. But what is true and what was chronicled is the systematic disenfranchisement of brave men and women who were out there serving their country—and that’s what Al Gore did. We have to break... The existence of the scrub list is well documented and even admitted by the companies that took part some of it can be viewed here: http://www.gregpalast.com/detail.cfm?artid=122&row=2%20scrub%20list |
"Tens of thousands" I really have to question that figure. But, that kind of problem occurs any time voter rolls are legally purged. Even in democratic states. In Maryland the boards of elections are supposed to remove from the rolls anyone who has not voted once in the last five years. That is supposed to prevent the dead from voting. Which is something that can happen all to frequently. We see more of that little trick from Democrats than Republicans. Chicago, New York, Philadelphia, and Baltimore are all famous for it. I do not usually get to listen to Mr. Hannity on the radio. But, on more than one occasion I have heard him oppoligize for making a misstatement, misquote, or not having all the facts at the time he said something. That is very rare from anyone on the air. Also, when I have listened and he has dropped someone it was not because he disagreed with them. It was because they were being obnoxious, rude, vulgar, or profane. You haven't won me over. But, you have definately come up with some excellent arguments for your cause. Something lacking to much in todays world. Well done. |
this purging wasnt there to remove the dead. Katherine Harris hired DBT in 98 (since merged with ChoicePoint, who if you look up are packed with Republican contributors) to remove the names of felons, and cast the net so far it cost thousands of people the right to vote. Tens of thousands among 173000 names on the scrub list. And this company was CONTRACTED. Florida is the ONLY state that pays a private company to 'cleanse' the vote. And they were hired by the woman who allowed Bush to campaign FROM HER OFFICE. from Greg Palast, who I referenced: "the list invariably targets a minority population in Florida, where 31 percent of all black men cannot vote because of a ban on felons. In compiling a list by looking at felons from other states, Florida could, in the process, single out citizens who committed felons in other states but, after serving their time or successfully petitioning the courts, had their voting rights returned to them. According to Florida law, felons can vote once their voting rights have been reinstated. And if this unfairly singled out minorities, it unfairly handicapped Gore: In Florida, 93 percent of African-Americans voted for the vice president. " it was voter fraud and I could keep going. And with Diebold and its chairman saying he'll do anything to get Bush re-elected, something like this may happen again. Theres no paper trail, and the machines have been proven unreliable and inaccurate. Why is it the right wing wants all voting to go electronic? |
Then, after their machines were used, some regular guy found a file on Diebold's FTP server with vote data with a timestamp of the middle polling hours on the day the polls were open. It shows that not only was it possible, but that they actually did it. |
As far as I'm concerned, I think most politians are crooked. They may start out with great ideals. But, power corrupts. And, very few can resist the temtations for long. I do not think Bush is crooked. But, the powers behind the throne? To many people from both major parties owe to much to others. The time is ripe for a third party. Unfortunately, I haven't seen anyone from the other parties that impresses me very much. |
|
I agree. |
you canNOT agree |
|
But it takes us into the realm of outright manipulation and conspiracy. There's no paper trail, and any inconsistencies can be blamed on glitches using the the magic tech-speak that people won't understand. There's no such thing as a re-count in electronic voting. And, of course, the corporations chosen to make these systems keep proving themselves absolutely untrustworthy. |
|
|
. They all are, really, but Fox doesn't care if everyone knows. |
|
|
So, don't go down that road, unless you can't back it up, buckwheat!!! perfect. |
oh, yeah. There's one more thing I gotta do! C'mon! . . . . . . Fuck you, you ass! |
And you completely missed the point. |
|
|
the republicans are now engaged in full-on damage control. actually, they have been for the last couple years. the public is catching on to their offense-is-the-best-defense tactics. the liberal media is back. |
|
|