on global warming


sorabji.com: The Stalking Post: on global warming
THIS IS A READ-ONLY ARCHIVE FROM THE SORABJI.COM MESSAGE BOARDS (1995-2016).

By Nate on Thursday, December 28, 2006 - 09:49 pm:

    this is mostly for tiggy. not trying to prod anyone into a war. just curious.

    the past 150 years or so is the span where we saw a sudden upswing in warming. scientists say there is overwhelming evidence that man is causing global warming by emitting certain gases into the atmosphere.

    but it seems to me there are other potential explanations. mainly, earth's magnetic field, which has decreased 10% in the same time period. decreasing the magnetic field should increase temperatures on earth, shouldn't it?

    i have to assume there is a culture of fear on both sides of this issue. government scientists can't side with the global warming people, non-government scientists probably have trouble being taken seriously if they try to publish non-human caused global warming research.

    i dunno. clearly.


By dave. on Thursday, December 28, 2006 - 11:40 pm:

    add to that the effect of global dimming, which i just recently learned about, and we may find ourselves in a real catch 22 regarding reducing emissions to slow down or reverse global warming.


By V on Thursday, December 28, 2006 - 11:54 pm:

    So far,we have a tax on everything that is harming the planet,may I ask how America is doing? As you all know,v lives in London.


By Nate on Thursday, December 28, 2006 - 11:55 pm:

    that's the kind of thing i'm talking about. this is such a huge, complex system, but the "thinking majority" of scientists claim there is overwhelming evidence that the warming is man-made.

    fuck all.

    plus, someone dumped some eyeshadow on one of my throw pillows, and i can't get the fucking shit out.

    not to mention, i hurt my ass playing wii bowling.


By Nate on Thursday, December 28, 2006 - 11:57 pm:

    you also signed the kyoto, chumps.

    maybe some economics minded person can explain the benefit of kyoto. it seems like it is all about shuffling the energy-consuming production of things, stuff, etc., to third-world countries and less energy-efficient, more highly polluting methods.

    it's not like kyoto does anything to combat the demand for products.


By V on Friday, December 29, 2006 - 12:10 am:

    ...within the next few years,I will have solar panels and a wind turbine on the roof,thats the law in Europe.The papers say only two countries are to blame for this,America and China,dont you feel guilty?


By heather on Friday, December 29, 2006 - 04:12 pm:

    no

    we are only trying to protect ourselves anyway
    i am not sure we are worth protecting

    the world doesn't care
    the world is fine with change
    it rolls like that


By TBone on Friday, December 29, 2006 - 07:16 pm:

    How'd you hurt your ass Wii bowling? So far all I've done is inadvertently punch things.

    The whole Climate Change issue is so politicized. Everyone's got some reason to want to believe what they believe. I'll admit that the right-wing oil-company insistence that everything is fine makes believing in human-caused climate change more attractive.


By Spider on Friday, December 29, 2006 - 07:58 pm:

    Didn't we once have a major board war over this global warming thing a few years back?


By Spider on Friday, December 29, 2006 - 07:58 pm:

    [I'm asking out of genuine forgetfulness, not in an attempt to curtail discussion.]


By droopy on Friday, December 29, 2006 - 08:14 pm:

    i remember the odd circle jerk on this subject over the years.

    i was just reading that the canadians (under pm stephen harper) are about to pull out (or have already, i can't remember) of their kyoto protocol commitment.


By wisper on Friday, December 29, 2006 - 10:57 pm:

    it's unclear to me if they can just abandon their kyoto goals, or if this sort of thing has to go to parliament. Or if they'll just let it fade. I can never tell how much of such a decision falls on the environment minister or on the whole house.
    The power division in this system is both the strength and the weakness :(
    But they're making a new plan! a "Made In Canada" plan!

    Harper and all his conservatives suck Alberta's cock, their priorities are with the money and the oil.


By dave. on Friday, December 29, 2006 - 11:57 pm:

    tangent.

    i don't know where the flying dreams thread is but this is one of the coolest things i've ever seen.

    http://www.jet-man.com/actuel.html

    click play then pause it to let it buffer for about 20 minutes.

    this is pilot porn.

    end tangent.


By Nate on Saturday, December 30, 2006 - 12:30 am:

    tangent

    40oz of apple juice and a pot of tea have made for local emissions causing environmental havoc.

    end tangent


By jack on Saturday, December 30, 2006 - 12:44 am:



    tangent

    tom yum pleasure

    end tangent




By sarah on Thursday, January 4, 2007 - 02:44 pm:


    i've only recently begun to consider that the effects of industrialization might be a real contributor to the speeding up of a pre-existing, cyclical global warming trend.


    for the record i must state that this consideration has absolutely nothing to do with watching An Inconvenient Truth, which i thought was mostly a pile of regurgitated horseshit.


    heretofore i could barely contain my rage whenever someone would rant about global warming and emissions and fossil fuels and CO2 and overpopulation recycling alternative energies save the earth BLAH BLAH FUCKING BLAH.


    even if global warming is happening faster than it was going to happen anyway, we may be able to slow it down a bit, but it's just a matter of time either way.


    like heather said:

    the world doesn't care
    the world is fine with change
    it rolls like that


    it's not Save the Earth, it's Save The Human Species.


    other species have gone extinct due to natural causes. what makes human-expedited global warming, real or imagined, unnatural?


    on the other hand, is there anything left about human existence that is natural?


    the only people on this planet who know what it really means to be human are the few remaining indigenous tribes untouched by "westernization".


    like the Jarawa tribe on the island in the Indian Ocean who survived the 2004 tsunami, while the rest of the "modern" world surrounding that area was completely demolished. the Jarawa ancient knowledge of the movement of wind, sea, and birds saved the indigenous tribe from the tsunami. they used cues from nature combined with handed-down lore to deduce that something wasn't right, that "the gods were angry", so they moved up the mountain on their island.


    they didn't need a warning system with horns and emergency broadcast systems. they didn't need SUVs, computers, scientific research, or processed cheese food to survive. all they have are loin cloths and arrows for hunting and fishing and huts and boats made from local natural resources.


    that is what it means to be human. to use your body to live and survive in nature, not overriding nature. to die of disease or natural causes. there's just birth, life, and death.


    i suspect that if the world does come to an end as we know it because of global warming, and anyone can survive, it will be these kinds of people. those who still live like humans.


    that said, i'm totally in favor of developing and implementing a new sustainable paradigm for living - even if this means giving up cars and boats and planes or spending money on alternative energy resources. whatever it takes. and i try my best to live responsibly now, to conserve, recycle.


    but even if everyone on the planet lived responsibly and sustainably, i suspect it wouldn't make enough of a difference in the long run.



    happy new year.





By Nate on Thursday, January 4, 2007 - 02:56 pm:

    i read/heard that something like 99% of species that have lived on earth are extinct.

    it ain't a hospitable place.


By Antigone on Sunday, January 7, 2007 - 03:22 pm:

    Nate, I heard that 100% of the people that were alive 150 years ago are now dead. That's just about as meaningful.

    And sarah, I hope you see the paradox of spouting luddite horse shit on an internet message board.

    Maybe ya'll are OK with the possibility of human society being destroyed. Personally I'm not.

    Look, global warming deniers first started yelling, "It's not getting warmer! It's not getting warmer!"

    Now you grudgingly admit that it is.

    So you're on to, "It's not our fault! It's not our fault!"

    One of these days you'll say, "OK, maybe it's our fault."

    That's why I'm tired of arguing this. The climate will eventually win the argument for me.


By Dr Pepper on Sunday, January 7, 2007 - 11:59 pm:

    I believe that there was global warming possible occuring every 10,000 or 20,000 years?


By Dr Pepper on Monday, January 8, 2007 - 12:10 am:

    Nate, I was told last year that they have few new reptile that,we never heard? somewhere in indonesia. and now, I am hearing that, there has been abnormal growth on frog, and recently a two headed snake, and today, I was told of .... a ....two headed ......uhmmm....cow? now you tell me, is this related to global warming? without ozone layer to protect the planet Earth from Sun solar radiation.. caused some abnormal growth.Oh bye the way. with out Ozone layer , it may also cause to Methane gas to rupture from ground below.


By blindswine on Monday, January 8, 2007 - 03:02 am:

    wasn't i saying that the motherfucking earth doesn't give a good god damn a long time ago?

    i think i was.

    i also remember making the comment that humanity was god's gift to maggots.

    anyway--

    happy new year, maggotfood.

    the good lord loves the flies.

    keep flying.



By blindswine on Monday, January 8, 2007 - 04:16 am:

    fuck that.

    fall in love.

    make children.

    feed them well-- nurture what's good.

    let's fight.

    let's fight to save ourselves.


By TBone on Monday, January 8, 2007 - 01:35 pm:

    Sarah, does being truly human include such a defeatist attitude?

    When the climate collapses, I don't think loin cloths will be the answer to survival. The humans you mentioned aren't known for their adaptability.


By sarah on Monday, January 8, 2007 - 02:04 pm:


    it's not defeatist. it's just science. or nature.


    what i'm saying is - with or without our help, the planet will continue to get warmer and warmer, and our species may go extinct because of it.


    the only argument to have is whether or not we can do anything to slow it down.


    it is my opinion that humans have the ability to slow it down, but slow it down enough to discover new ways to adapt?


    but at whatever rate, it's going to continue to get warmer.


    hot. cold. hot. cold. hot. cold. for billions of years, long before humans were part of the equation.


    the end.



By semillama on Monday, January 8, 2007 - 02:20 pm:

    Actually, there are ways to slow it down quickly, if not stop it. Controversial ways of course, but there are ways. One involves mimicking the effects of a large volcanic eruption in the artic - essentially spraying particulates in the upper atmosphere over the artic regions, resulting in a localized and temporary cooling that is projected to regenerate ice sheets within a decade. It's controversial for a number of reasons, mainly due to uncertainties with the effects in the actual world (computer modeling shows that it would work with few if any adverse effects); that this would just be delaying the inevitable switch from carbon-emitting fuel sources; that it would take too long to get worldwide support (since we would be taking a direct, purposeful action to affect the climate in a drastic manner, unlike the nondirect, unpurposed manner we are now).

    I'm all for it. We're running out of options. And the indigenous tribes with all the mad survival skills also happen to be the ones in the areas likeliest to be most effected by climate change (pacific islanders, artic specialists, rain forest tribes, african savannah dwellers).


By Dr Pepper on Tuesday, January 9, 2007 - 03:05 am:

    Was there possible of global warming long ago, i mean such like 10,000 or 20,000 years back? I believe few has survived long ago, such like Aborgine people.But ,I am not good with science or doing such like research. hopefully ,I just wanted to know if there was a global warming previously.


bbs.sorabji.com
 

The Stalking Post: General goddam chit-chat Every 3 seconds: Sex . Can men and women just be friends? . Dreamland . Insomnia . Are you stoned? . What are you eating? I need advice: Can you help? . Reasons to be cheerful . Days and nights . Words . Are there any news? Wishful thinking: Have you ever... . I wish you were... . Why I oughta... Is it art?: This question seems to come up quite often around here. Weeds: Things that, if erased from our cultural memory forever, would be no great loss Surfwatch: Where did you go on the 'net today? What are you listening to?: Worst music you've ever heard . What song or tune is going through your head right now? . Obscure composers . Obscure Jazz, 1890-1950 . Whatever, whenever General Questions: Do you have any regrets? . Who are you? . Where are you? . What are you doing here? . What have you done? . Why did you do it? . What have you failed to do? . What are you wearing? . What do you want? . How do you do? . What do you want to do today? . Are you stupid? Specific Questions: What is the cruelest thing you ever did? . Have you ever been lonely? . Have you ever gone hungry? . Are you pissed off? . When is the last time you had sex? . What does it look like where you are? . What are you afraid of? . Do you love me? . What is your definition of Heaven? . What is your definition of Hell? Movies: Last movie you saw . Worst movie you ever saw . Best movie you ever saw Reading: Best book you've ever read . Worst book you've ever read . Last book you read Drunken ramblings: uiphgy8 hxbjf.bklf ghw789- bncgjkvhnqwb=8[ . Payphones: Payphone Project BBS
 

sorabji.com . torturechamber . px.sorabji.com . receipts . contact