THIS IS A READ-ONLY ARCHIVE FROM THE SORABJI.COM MESSAGE BOARDS (1995-2016). |
---|
i'll pause while you regain your composure. ok, ready? i guess not. here's the rub: i'm gonna call the automated message number on the day i'm supposed to but i'm very inclined toward not filling out and turning in the juror profile attached to the notice. i don't feel like they need to know any of that info. i also believe that they already know that info. i think that the most important reason for sending the profile questionnaire is summed up in the last few words of the following line: i declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of washington that the foregoing statements are true and correct, AND THAT I ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF THIS SUMMONS. (<-- those words) i don't feel comfortable about signing this damn thing. whaddaya think? |
|
i wanna be the teflon coating on the frying pan of justice. |
dave vs the man, part infinity. |
|
not voluntarily. |
eventually you go into a courtroom for the interviews with the lawyers in the case. i always know what to say to keep from being picked. |
i hate that i fuck up like that all the time. sure, put me on a jury. deliver someone's fate into my hands. perhaps after i've given my verdict, i'll have a regrets about my decision. won't that be great? |
|
|
the time i had the interview with the lawyers (which wasn't one on one) was for some insurance case. when they asked me if i had any problems with the insurance industry, i launched into a tirade about all the insurance problems i've ever had. i was eliminated. |
|
here's the thing. if i was on trial, i'd want a jury full of daves. i mean, that is, if you bothered to care. |
|
just tell them your employer doesnt give you paid leave for jury duty and you have a family to provide for and need every god damn days worth of pay. Thats how they seperated us initially. The room was pretty much divided into fifths. Those with no paid leave, those with 1 day, 3 days, 5 days and 10 days. They were pretty cool about dismissing right away those with zero paid leave. ME? I wanted to see what it was all about I wanted to get picked. Im glad I aided in getting a cross dressing homosexual hooker back on the streets. |
and, i'm in full agreement with sarah. i would definitely want a jury full of myselves if i were on trial. |
|
|
it was a guy who sued his insurance company because the wouldn't pay up when his car was 'stolen and set on fire' we made the company pay. they sent a really pathetic lawyer to defend themselves and for some reason that really bothered me. |
|
Anywho, I said that I had been robbed, and was subsequently dismissed from every panel I sat on. And I haven't responded to any of the jury duty summonses I've received since. In the trash can they go. Biggest waste of a week in my life. Jury of your peers? How about luck of the draw? Anyways, we've had this discussion. |
|
The first time I sat on three juries. One case involved a man sueing his realestate agent because the county wouldn't let him run his plumbing supply busness from his property. Even though the zoning was right; his driveway was to narrow. He ended up buying ten feet of his neighbors property to comply. He wanted a full refund from the realtor. He lost. He himself had double checked everything with the county directly so he could not claim he had been mislead. The second case was an armed robbery of a local Taco Bell. It took all of ten minutes to settle that one. It's kind of hard to convict someone when the prosecutions key witness says "that is not the guy" and their secondary witness left the scene then came back. The final case involved a will. It was hand written in pencil. It had something erased from it. We were supposed to determine if the will was valid. This case took a little longer. We had one of "those" jurors with us. He argued everything. We argued over whether a bank vice president, one of the wills witnesses, would sign a will written in pencil. We argued, the important issue, if the beenficiary - who had the will in their posestion - could have made the erasure to their benefit. We argued the mental ability of the deceased. All it took was some common scence which this one juror didn't have to much of. Eventually we decided the will was invalid no matter who made the erasuers they invalidated the will. Both other times I have been called, I have not been chosen for a jury. I don't think they wanted a federal employee on the panel. Although sitting on a federal jury would have been interesting I was just as glad to be off. |