THIS IS A READ-ONLY ARCHIVE FROM THE SORABJI.COM MESSAGE BOARDS (1995-2016). |
---|
|
ever appear on sorabji. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
If I did I would have to take SH**. And, I don't take SH** from anybody. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**IS ANYONE READING THESE?** |
|
|
|
|
|
In whatever country Jews have settled in any great number, they have lowered its moral tone; depreciated its commercial integrity; have segregated themselves and have not been assimilated; have sneered at and tried to undermine the Christian religion upon which that nation is founded, by objecting to its restrictions; have built up a state within the state; and when opposed have tried to strangle that country to death financially, as in the case of Spain and Portugal. For over 1,700 years, the Jews have been bewailing their sad fate in that they have been exiled from their homeland, as they call Palestine. But gentlemen, did the world give it to them in fee simple, they would at once find some reason for not returning. Why? Because they are vampires, and vampires do not live on vampires. They cannot live only among themselves. They must subsist on Christians and other people not of their race. If you do not exclude them from these United States, in their Constitution, in less than 200 years they will have swarmed here in such great numbers that they will dominate and devour the land and change our form of government, for which we Americans have shed our blood, given our lives our substance and jeopardized our liberty. If you do not exclude them, in less than 200 years our descendants will be working in the fields to furnish them substance, while they will be in the counting houses rubbing their hands. I warn you, gentlemen, if you do not exclude Jews for all time, your children will curse you in your graves. Jews, gentlemen, are Asiatics, let them be born where they will nor how many generations they are away from Asia, they will never be otherwise. Their ideas do not conform to an American's, and will not even thou they live among us ten generations. A leopard cannot change its spots. Jews are Asiatics, are a menace to this country if permitted entrance, and should be excluded by this Constitutional Convention." |
|
|
|
|
-GW Bush What? it reminds of a quote of Ronald Reagan that went something to the effect of "What would this country be without this great land of ours?" Uhhhhhhhhhh Like i predicted before the dumbass got elected...in a years time, you won't find but a small percentage of people who admit that they voted for this nitwit of President. |
didja hear gore's speech? that boy can talk! made sense, too but this administration frowns on making sense unless it's dollars and cents. making money is making sense. (name that tune!) |
If only more democrats would grab their nutsacks and follow inline with Gore's POV...unfortunately most of them are pussies and will sign off on the Attack Iraq Regardless Doctrine. |
Funny. |
|
I will say, without any hesitation, that I am very releived that Bush is in office instead of Gore. |
|
That he didn't, didn't already have" Dumb song, dumb lyrics. Sorry. |
|
There's little in it im sure. IF they had evidence we'd be hearing all kinds of specifics. This is an opinion i can trust: "However, Maj. Charles Heyman, editor of Jane's World Armies, said the dossier "does not produce any convincing evidence ... that Saddam Hussein has to be taken out straight away." "What it does do," he said, "is produce very convincing evidence that the weapons inspectors have to be pushed back into Iraq very quickly." Blair can shove it up his ass...fucking lapdog. |
|
****************** He's trying to pursue this all-party (note the avid (opposition party) Tory support of the US policy), long-term, main plank of UK Foreign Policy (standing with the US) in conjunction with a man (Bush) whose motivations he entirely distrusts and agenda he disagrees with – IMHO, this particular scenario (a conservative US president with self-serving agenda's, strutting on the international stage) is, literally, the worst-case scenario for a British PM. I rather imagine he wants the next two (plus) years to be over as soon as possible and for the US electorate to vote in a politician. Yet the further Blair goes in his support of Bush, the more exposed he is domestically – bridging this cavernous divide is costing him an awful lot of credibility at home as the perceived flaws (evidence, motivation, Mandate....) are exploited by others for their own gain (though, curiously, the Official Opposition isn't amongst them). ************* I can imagine the chronic stomache-ache that man must have. |
This man is a mennace. He has been and he continues to be. No one has explained to me yet how things have improved since 1998. Where was the "Anti-War" effort then? Where were the hearings on Capital Hill? Where was Daschell saying "We cannot act unilateraly, we need UN Resolutions before we act" in 1998? |
There is no modern historical doctrine to support an unprovoked attack. Its against international law dumbass! Just because things havent improved since 98 per se doesnt sound the war bells. There was no war drum beating in 98 because a Bush looking for control of oil and revenge wasnt in the office. Who gives a shit what Dashele was doing. If we knew where his alleged nuclear weapons sites, don't you think we would 'fed exed' some mother fuckin Cruise missles by now? And while you are asking questions....based on your assessment of why we should attack...tell me why we arent heading to North Korea? They have a greater military capability than Saddam? Just like our expedition into Afghanistan, you present your evidence, then you go. They did that to NATO and to the UN. All parties agreed we had sufficient evidence. Where the fuck is the evidence now trace? |
No, no war drums. ??? As far as evidence, what the fuck? I am sorry, have you gone completely mad??? |
It was supposed to be about quotes that were relevant to shit going on today. EVERYONE IS EVIL EVERYONE HAS ALTERIAR MOTIVES THEY SHOULD ALL BE INVADED THEY SHOULD ALL BE LEFT ALONE In the end, it should be about your end. Protecting it, that is. |
i happened to listen to rush for a few minutes today and it was verbatim what hannity and o'reilly and chris matthews say, which is verbatim what the administration has to say. they attack their opponents for using the exact same tactics they used when the dems were in office. with a straight face (look close enough and you'll note the smirk) they chide gore and the democrats in congress for playing politics, reacting to polls and betraying the public. step right up, join the republican party! join today and you get a free teeth sharpening from karl rove himself! chew through any democratic ass out there -- guaranteed! ass chewing was never this good! |
You arent telling us anything new. The only thing most of us are arguing against is acting unilaterally, acting against international law, national building, acting aggressively against a sovereign nation whose level of threat against the US has yet to be determined and setting a dangerous dangerous precident for pre emptive war. The evidence? Yes dumbass, i want evidence that what was verified and destroyed by UNESCOM has been rebuilt. Where's the nuclear technology? Where's the proof that he has capability to launcha biological weapon. According to Scott Ritter, he doesnt have the ability to deliver Anthrax. According to Scott Ritter his chemical weapons have exceeded their shelf life. I want proof that they have chemical weapons that are currently pose a threat!! Also, you should note, according to Scott Ritter: Question- What were the circumstances that led the U.N. weapons inspectors to leave Iraq in December 1998? The Bush administration and the media often repeat that Saddam "kicked out" the weapons inspectors, and that's why we face the necessity of war today. Answer- Nothing could be further from the truth. The Iraqis did not kick the inspectors out in December 1998. The Americans ordered the inspectors out, and then bombed Iraq using intelligence information gathered by the inspectors to target Saddam Hussein and his security apparatus. i didnt drag this thread down this road dipshit, J asked a question, i responded to her. Then you asked some questions and i responded to you. If you dont want answers, dont ask questions. and lastly....we're on the verge of an ujust, illegal war. The president and his crew of hawks are making the world more dangerous for me and my family whether you realize it or not (HELLO!!!) if you expect me to act anything less than rabid, passionate and enflamed like a hemorrhoid on a LA bus drivers ass in August you can just pack up and move on. |
funny how the hawksish of hawks have, for the most part, never seen an inkling of war, yet those who have seen hardcore war-time are, for the most part, lined up against going to Iraq |
|
|
Rollins? |
|
|
|
"The skin on your soul is so thin you finally see you have a spine in there and its back is broken." And of course, the classic: "The best revenge is always to survive yourself." |
|
|
|
|
|
ALWAYS get it in writing." |
|
|
lifeguard. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Don't let them bring it to you. Put them on the defensive, and don't ever apologize for anything." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mencken: Why do men go to zoos? |
|
|
***** My vision of a 'new world order' foresees a United Nations with a revitalized peacekeeping function. ***** It is the SACRED principles enshrined in the UN Charter to which we will henceforth pledge our allegiance. |
|
that's how socialism works, isn't it. heil hitler. |
that's how socialism works, isn't it. heil hitler. |
|
Example: Our task of creating a capitalist America can only succeed when those who would resist us have been totally disarmed. or Our task of creating a white America can only succeed when those who would resist us have been totally disarmed. You could attribute that to any white guy from the 1800's and no one would blink an eye. |
|
|
Seems like half-dozen of one, six of the other. |
- on going to war over religion |
|
Rome, Britain (western europe), China, Mongolia, Germany tried a couple of times, USA, |
|
|
|
Niccolò Machiavelli (1469–1527) |
|
-The Museum Deputy Director on the looting and destruction of the Iraqi National Museum. |
John Adams, Thoughts on Government, 1776 |
|
-- P.G. Wodehouse |
I would say it does. |
|
sounds closer to the reality |
birds and snakes and aeroplane and Lenny Bruce is not afraid eye of a hurricane listen to yourself churn world serves it's own needs don't misserve your own needs speed it up a knotch speed grunt no strength the ladder starts to clatter wire in the fire represented seven gangs and a government for hire in a combat site Lester wasn't coming in a hurry with the furies breathing down your neck team by team reporters baffled trump tended crop look at that low plane fine then uh oh overflow population coming quick but it'll do save yourself, serve yourself, world serve it's own needs listen to your heart beat tell me with the rapture and the reverend in the right right bite right fight feeling pretty psyched its the end of the world as we know it its the end of the world as we know it its the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine six o'clock tv hour don't get caught in foreign tower slash and burn return listen to yourself churn lock him in uniform and book burning blood letting every motive escalate automotive incinerate light a candle light a votive uh oh this means no fear, cavalier renegade steer clear a tournament, a tournament, a tournament of lies offer me solutions, offer me alternatives and i decline its the end of the world as we know it its the end of the world as we know it its the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine the other night i tripped a nice continental drift to find mount St. Edelite Leonard Berntstein Leonid Brehznev Lenny Bruce and Lester Bangs birthday party cheescake jelly bean boom you symbiotic patriotic slam book neck right? right. |
Modern man I've only got time for a few, and not you Modern man I'll push you hard, I can't know you Modern man 'Cause then we'd have to be friends, and that just won't do Modern man, Modern man Living tomorrow is everyone's sorrow Modern man's daydreams have turned into nightmares It's for you that I sing to share what I feel Modern Man The things I need in this world Modern Man If you don't like it, you can leave me alone Modern man, Modern man 'Cause when I talk to you I want to hang up the phone Modern man, Modern man |
1.) He neglected his duties to protect the contents in the first place. Everyone knew this war was coming; even after troops moved into the country, he had weeks to move the artifacts elsewhere or otherwise secure them. 2.) They're objects. No matter how historic or irreplacable, it's vulgar in the extreme to compare them to dead people, especially when all around him, the non-privileged really did lose members of their families. 3.) He's the asshole who fled Baghdad, only to return a week later after the looting, and was shown on TV berating a janitor as to why he didn't protect the collections. 4.) It turns out that many of the things weren't looted at all but taken away for safe keeping and are now being brought back by the ordinary people who did Fucknuts' job for him. 5.) Of what is missing, there is evidence that it was a professional inside job done under cover of "looting". The first place to look would be under Nabhal Amin's bed and in his bank account. 6.) It's the US's fault that we didn't stop Iraqis from looting Iraqi buildings? Fuck them and their camels. |
2.) Maybe it's vulgur, but they aren't just objects. That's like saying the people were just animals. For perspective, try imagining the Smithsonian trashed and National Archives in flames. Imagine Old Glory ripped apart by souvenir hunters. 3.) Yeah, he's an asshole for that. 4.)And you have any evidence for this? I believe they've recovered 20 some artifacts so far - out of about 200,000. 5.) Actually, the first place to look is in antiquity collectors' vaults and bank accounts. 6.) Yes, it's (partially) the US's fault. All it would have took is one tank in front of a hospital, one tank in front of the museum and one tank in front of the library. Surely they could have parked them there as well as anywhere else. And I'm not even going to point out what's stupid about the last half of you comment. |
|
and the WTC was just a building I suppose? |
Sem, you are 100% correct about that. There was NO REASON why we could not protect important buildings and structures. |
im not sure the Iraqi's nor the Americans completely figured on the degree of piracy from the Iraqi populus. |
|
|
"The risk Iraqi leaders may use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us, or our allies, is the greatest security threat we face." Madeline Albright, 2-18-98 "He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983." Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Advisor, 2-18-98 "... take necessary steps to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." Letter to President Clinton from Sens. Levin, Daschle, Kerry and others, 10-9-98 "Saddam's engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology." Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., 12-16-98 "He's reinvigorated his weapons programs ... biological, chemical and nuclear programs ... he continues to redefine delivery systems to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies." Letter to President Bush from Sen. Bob Graham, D-Fla., and others, 12-5-01 "Saddam is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He's ... building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them." Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., 9-12-02 "He's stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." Al Gore, 9-23-02 "We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." Sen. Ted Kennedy, D-Mass., 9-27-02 "Saddam retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons ... he is seeking nuclear weapons ..." Sen. Robert Byrd, D-W.V., 10-3-02 "I'll be voting to give the president of the United States the authority to use force ... to disarm Saddam. ... I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., 10-9-02 "Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons." Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.V., 10-10-02 "Hussein's worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability and his nuclear program. He's given aid, comfort and sanctuary to terrorists, including al-Qaeda members." Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., 10-10-02 "... a brutal, murderous dictator ... an oppressive regime ... continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... the threat of Saddam with weapons of mass destruction is real." Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., 1-23-03 |
no. so shut up. okay? you make no point. |
france and germany and russia were right. heh. |
I make no point to those who are pointless. |
I know this has nothing to do with what's being talked about but it's much more interesting than political bickering. |
it is. i dont even know what spunky is talking about. which cd do you like best sem? at first i was big on Andre's album, but I think I like Big Boi's better now, after listening to both of them for 2 weeks straight. He's got some beats and compositions that just blow me away.The way its constructed from song to song is also fucking notable.The transition from "War" to "Church" is just fantastic. Andre's is great, his lyrics crack me up. |
|
Ummmm, some of them voted yes on the war resolution in Oct '02............ |
I would have to say that Andre is obviously more overtly experimental, but I could tell there was a lot going on with Big Boi that I would need some more listens to comprehend. I'm cleansing the palatte with some Fantomas right now, but going back to Outkast after this. I think I will give Big Boi a listen first. I do get the personal impression that Andre's album is after party while Big Boi's is during the party, you know what I mean? After my cats kill a bug, they generally bat it about for a bit and then go find something more interesting to do. |
talk to me in a weeks time. there's that much on those albums to absord. |
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/afp/20031005/pl_afp/us_iraq_weapons_kay_031005210455 |
|
|
crocadille on my feet foxbury on my back bowtie around my neck thats while the call me the gangsta mack IN A CADILLAC! |
grrrrrrrrr |
"Shake it like a polaroid picture" |
its fucking hilarious. the "Way you move" video also rules. seriously, i don't understand how all the other mainstream artists, with the exception of Missy Elliot (her videos blow me away too) and maybe Ludacris don't just pack the fuck up. They all look significantly more stupid with Outkast on the scene. |
the 'talking through the song while much more talented female singer does the hook and sells your albums' thing is over. |
they make it seem so simple, so obvious. its like rap, soul and rock...the line is being blurred more and more at least on the rap side anyway. no like in a 311, fred durst kind of way. the continued use of traditional instrumentation is, to me anyway, a breath of fresh air. the soul and funk and impromptu ness of rap is still there, its just being presented in a better way, tto me anyway. |
rowlf, you don't have to buy it in october. you could aquire it in october and buy it in november. |
peruse brittany sites often n8? |
heh. abreast. |
|