THIS IS A READ-ONLY ARCHIVE FROM THE SORABJI.COM MESSAGE BOARDS (1995-2016). |
---|
I have a love thing for sports bras, but I think I ought to be able to purchase something to wear with tank tops and the like. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
I hate bra shopping. |
|
|
|
But I did see one in the VS catalog that was $68 dollars. [insert hydraulics joke here] |
|
|
i need bras lots of them good ones going without is not an option they are terrible and too expensive and they wear out just when they get to be perfect maybe this is a business opportunity |
|
|
or falls out in the washing machine |
|
Antigone: Wonderbra might do it (stuffed). I would go with coconut shells, actually... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
some things aren't a matter of choice you know |
|
Mine are getting smaller (boobs I mean). I'm not sure if I'm happy about that or not. I am because it means the rest of me is shrinking, and I'm getting lower sizes, but it also means the girls are getting smaller. I think I would rather be healthy than overweight. |
|
And if I were snotty, I would say that the reason that A- and B-cup bras are so nice is so that the people who wear them have something to feel good about. But I'm not snotty, so forget I said that. |
|
|
|
|
Then again, the size changes a little. I'm a C in the Victoria's Secret line, but a D in the Olga line. Go figure. It's highly irritating. Oh well. I've settled for VS Second Skin Satin, which I believe I have said before, but still stand by. Very comfortable bra, not overly sexy, but it does the job. Or at least, I think so. But I'm not going to take a picture. By the way, what happened with the nude pcitures that Nate has? |
|
|
make your own bra |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowery Twats and Watery Rats and Fatty Owls Anybody? |
|
|
|
|
|
In Style, which started off as a People magazine spinoff in the mid-90s, is People without the people, just the celebrities. And that's why it's better. If I cared about orphans and beauticians and cancer patients and high school shootout survivors, I'd ... well, I can't imagine what. I would never be personally interested in personal-interest stories about the unattractive and dull. (Unless someone made them into a movie, and then only to see if they resembled the star who played them.) But In Style is all good. Its favorite story subjects have lots of names and homes. And it tells you how you can be just like them. While the upscale New York fashion magazines are prettier and glossier and classier, they're not very instructive. They're for flipping through in bookstores or airports, where someone might see you. In Style magazine is strictly for the gym, which, unlike, say, Barnes and Noble, only the truly desperate could ever regard as a pickup place. When I get there, I look for In Style first. And then I always look at the date. If it's not one of the two most recent issues, I don't pick it up. Because here in Portland, it's OK to wear what Hollywood vixens had on three months ago, but if you want to adopt a six-month-old look, you'd better head for the suburbs. So a couple nights ago, I found a still valid In Style magazine, and it had very, very good news. Sarah Jessica Parker and some other actress wore fish-net stockings! And In Style said it was OK! I should have known. They're are part of the current DKNY hosiery line -- that alone should have been sufficient justification. But here I had photographic evidence that fish-net stockings weren't just for sluts anymore. In Style, ever mindful of their followers' need for explicit direction, said to look for brands with a touch of lycra to avoid "sausage legs." Just after I bought them, I saw Dave Eggers guy. Well, practically everyone is Dave Eggers guy now. Everyone talks about the book, mentions it in their personals ads, puts it on the agenda for their reading groups. The only thing they don't seem to do is read it. Well, I haven't, anyway. I offered to show him my new shoes. "They're cute. What else did you buy?" "Oh, some fish-net stockings. It's OK to wear them now, you know." "I want to see." I started pulling them out of my bag. "No, I don't want to see them in the bag. That's just fabric. I want to see them ON," he said. "Well, I'm going to wear them tonight. Maybe you would see me if you went to Shanghai Tunnel." "Where's that?" "You've never been to Shanghai Tunnel? It's in Old Town. It used to be a shanghai tunnel." "What's a shanghai tunnel?" "Do you know what 'shanghai' means?" I asked in my most condescending voice. Guys love to be abused, or so I'd heard. "Yes, I know what 'shanghai' means. It means to be mugged, right?" "Yeah, sort of," I said generously. "It's more specific, though. It's when they used to get men really drunk, until they passed out, and then kidnap them and put them on boats to work as sailors, and they'd just sail away. This place is underground and there used to be passages to the waterfront." All he wanted was to see a hot chick in fishnets, and instead he was getting vocabulary and history lessons. Sometimes I like to think I can turn flirting into something like theatrical performance, get interesting and telling things said, but other times I think what's really going on is that I'm completely inept. I'm not liked for my charm but despite my lack of it. But he acted interested. It's a good story. I almost started telling him more about Portland of old, about the floating whorehouse and the haunted tavern and the iron hitching posts in the sidewalk a few blocks away. Maybe I would have if I had been wearing the stockings -- then I could have been sure he would have let me finish. I've been avoiding all situations in which someone could cut me off. I don't want to finish telling the fish-net story. There's no surprise ending. I wore them. They work. They drive men wild. But who would want to do a stupid thing like that? |
|
here's one link: http://www.speakeasy.org/~tvc15/cyst I'm skinnier now. |
|
http://communities.msn.com/flagrantedelicto |
if you're bored, please look at the 10 photos in the corpus directory and tell me which you like best. I'm working on a little "art" project. |
http://www.geocities.com/demaquillant/flagrantedelicto.html http://www.geocities.com/demaquillant/flagrantedelicto2.html http://www.geocities.com/demaquillant/flagrantedelicto3.html |
Do you have any other lense other than a 50? Frame closer......otherwise good work. Has your hair really gotten that long or was that a wig? |
|
|
by the way cyst...not to completly wank on technical fodder but what kind of film did you use? brand and speed? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) A cross-eyed Cheri Oteri b) The kid in Deliverance (with better hair and teeth) |
and she occasionally dates steve martin. |
|
|
|
and I noticed.......that looks like a really neato top!!!! i bet it looks super from behind.....it reminds me of a beaded entrance, to something, not sure what, but perhaps i could leave that for you decide. |
|
|
|
droopy, her older work is much more interesting. I love those elaborate sets she set up. patrick, the shots that don't look all texturized and fucked up were shot with kodak tmax 3200, 1/60, god, I don't know, somewhere around f8. the crappy ones were standard fujicolor 400. 1/60 and with the aperture wide open, probably. I scanned them in as b&w pictures. I don't especially like any of these photos, although I think I look great. I wasn't holding the camera still enough on the 400s; I wasn't doing anything to compensate for my lack of depth of field with the aperture so wide on the 400s; I wasn't framing my shots well; the background is way, way too busy. I have a couple more rolls, all more explicit, still at the developers. one's another roll of 3200, and the other is color fuji 1600. I think as I got sluttier, I also got more careful. that evening started off with me just wanting to polish off a roll of film. then I raided the refrigerator for the rest of what I had. I bought my first roll of c-41 b&w this weekend. I was totally suggestible and got the kodak select because the clerk said it was better than the ilford. hey, patrick, do you know if there are any c-41s faster than 400? and are they worth the convenience? I mean, for the dumb crap that I'm doing. true b&w costs so much. |
what word would go there? what word would fit the analogy: pyrrhic is to victory as _______ is to gift? I bought a little photo album that must have been first purchased at a gift shop many, many years ago. it has a naugahyde cover, and it says "yellowstone park" and behind a little plastic cover there's a snapshot of a grizzly bear. the inside pages are black construction paper. I am going to fill them with selected prints of these 100+ photos I've taken. then I'm going to send it off to a friend, who won't know what to do with it. I'll tell him it's ok to throw them away, but he probably won't. it won't matter; I got doubles. |
|
you are better off with the tmax 3200 (my personal staple)....or tmax or triX 400. Now i usually push all of my films 1-2 stops (i.e. 3200 to 6400 for ULTRA SEXY grain and tmax OR trix 400 to 1600, 2 stop for ultra sexy grain) i always opt for faster film simply because i can use a higher aperture, and i am sure you have learned by now, anything below an 8 is rarely desireable. I never shoot below 8 if i don't have too or unless its intentional. your depth of field goes to shit.......your resolution can suffer. also, that allows me to shoot without flash, as you are doing, under dim lit situations. HOWever, if you are outdoors in full sun and are looking to try some inexpensive, but kick ass film, give AGFA Pan films a try. They are usually cheap, I get rolls of 36 for around $3 or so. Try the 25, 50, 100. The fifty is only made in europe so some stores may not have it. I always push these films one stop, (i.e. 25 to 50, 100 to 200 and so on) AFGA films have fine resolution and their slower films are stellar under sunlit conditions. however while i am wanking all this technical crap to make myself feel knowledgeable (thank you for askign a question)...if you push your films, you have to advise your lab how many stops. I assume you go to the regular joe labs on the corner......yes? if not GOOD, you really need a professional lab if you are going to start pushing your film. |
|
|
it has a plastic lense, with only 4 distance settings, and a sun/no sun option it. total piece off shit but takes some neato photos |
I wish I could take a good photo of my back. when I stretch, I can count every rib. but it's not gross, it's beautiful. I e-mailed some of the photos to a friend in california and he called me that night. he was very sweet. he said he liked them. "THANK YOU," he said. "they totally made my whole day." "oh really? what did you like about them?" "I look at these photos and I see a girl who really needs to be FUCKED. oh my god, you have perfect breasts. I've jacked off to that one once already today. if you were here, I would try to seduce you. what I want you to do is ride me. I want to play with your tits and see your beautiful face while you ... oh god ... I'm hurting myself. these pants." "please don't hurt yourself. hey, listen, I have to go." "yeah, me too. I'm supposed to go out to dinner in a few minutes, but I think I need to come again before I go. I can't go out like this. christ, these photos are incredible." "I'm really glad I could help. have a nice time. I'll talk to you later, ok? bye." I didn't really mind. I thought he would ask me to stay on the phone, but he didn't. I love when they keep that respectful distance. |
Maybe this roll got shuffled to the bottom of a stack? You should have gotten doubles so you could send the extras to the lab...(Actually, Patrick correct me if I'm wrong), but I think they have big machines now and don't even see what they develop. Anway. You'll have to post this new roll. |
|
I remember in high school when a friend took a nude roll which I happened to be in and developed it in the high school darkroom...damn. I guess technically it wasn't very legal of us, but she said the photography class had really high attendance for a day or so. Hm. Anyway. That's a different case altogether. |
I've had doubles made of select photos in rolls I only asked for singles for. (apparently they forgot to retrieve them before they gave them to me.) I've had male friends pick up my photos for me and the clerk has told them to say hi to their friend for him. I've had friends who have worked at photo shops give me prints of weird photos they've come across. the photo people look. |
|
|
|