Venezuela v. Bush


sorabji.com: Are there any news?: Venezuela v. Bush
THIS IS A READ-ONLY ARCHIVE FROM THE SORABJI.COM MESSAGE BOARDS (1995-2016).

By Nate on Tuesday, April 16, 2002 - 10:53 am:

    hi spunky

    in defense of democracy,
    the good ol'
    US of A
    recognized the government of
    some guy named pedro
    (installed as president,
    after a military coup.)

    recognized as the government of
    venezuela
    mere seconds after the
    democratically elected
    hugo
    was overthrown and thrown is prison.

    the white house welcomed
    venezuela's
    'return to democracy'

    after a military coup
    ousted the democractically elected
    hugo chavez

    did i mention
    hugo chavez has won
    NINE popular votes
    since first elected in
    1997?

    including the creation
    and ratification of
    a constitution?

    did i mention that
    said consitution
    put all oil in venezuela
    in the control of a
    state run oil company?

    1954, guatamala
    ringing bells.

    can you say
    C I A?

    the agents of the coup
    spoke with the us ambassador
    before acting

    (acknowledged by the
    US government.)

    hugo is investigating
    a private jet
    with US markings
    that mysteriously appeared
    and disappeared
    before and after
    the coup.

    the US of A
    signed
    a treaty
    along with the
    rest of the
    american countries-

    a year ago-

    that said-

    in plain language-

    that no government
    attained by military means

    would be recognized

    by anyone

    who signed.





By spunky on Tuesday, April 16, 2002 - 10:57 am:

    Cool.


By spunky on Tuesday, April 16, 2002 - 11:04 am:


By spunky on Tuesday, April 16, 2002 - 11:12 am:

    I found the article.
    Interesting I could only find it in the NY Times. Still scouring though, to see if there is more then one source.


By spunky on Tuesday, April 16, 2002 - 11:23 am:

    The United States has frequently been at odds with Chavez, a populist friendly to Fidel Castro and Saddam Hussein.


By drpy on Tuesday, April 16, 2002 - 11:56 am:

    to my knowledge:

    hugo and fidel are old buddies and venezuela supplies oil to cuba. it was briefly suspended after the coup.

    He's made a couple of day trips to Libya and Iraq, and was the first foreign leader since the Gulf War in 1991 to travel to Baghdad.

    he has a neutral stance on the FARC insurgency in Colombia.

    nothing for the cia to stage a coup over, in my opinion. but what do i know. i don't even know what ostensible reason they gave for the coup.

    we have definitely got to stop recognizing self-proclaimed governments. if only truman had listened to george marshall back in '48...

    but now hugo's back.

    what really interests me is argentina's invasion of europe.


By patrick on Tuesday, April 16, 2002 - 12:29 pm:

    whats weird is no one, at least as far as I read, was calling it a "coup" until after Chavez returned.


By patrick on Tuesday, April 16, 2002 - 12:30 pm:

    and it was reported as if Chavez was resigning under pressure, not by force per se, especially military force.

    it kinda shocked me when after 2 days i saw the headline Chavez returns.


By Hugo_Chavez on Tuesday, April 16, 2002 - 12:51 pm:

    I'm back and I'm pissed!
    I'm increasing the price of oil, increasing the price of beef exports to McDonalds and increasing the number of illegals coming to work for you.


By eri on Tuesday, April 16, 2002 - 01:09 pm:

    McDonalds doesn't use Chavez's beef, sillies. They use the beef rejected by Alpo. That's right girls and boys, if Alpo rejects the meat pointing out that it isn't good meat, then off it goes to McDonald's and they actually buy it!

    I bet there are more illegals coming here. Apparently the economy is great for jobs that don't require a college degree. A family just moved here from Missouri, because they couldn't find work there. Know what they are doing here? Building maintenance for our crappy ass apartment complex. Aparently it paid enough to get them to move 900 miles away!


By drpy on Tuesday, April 16, 2002 - 01:47 pm:

    i once worked with an illegal immigrant from venezuela, now that i think about it. he had a university degree - philosophy, i think. he was aloof and ironic with the gringos and the country-bumpkin mojados in the crew (grunt work for a landscaping company), but generally a pretty nice guy. he would give the boss a wry smile and say "pinche gringo," and the boss would smile back at him.


By Nate on Tuesday, April 16, 2002 - 02:20 pm:

    i think the democratically elected leader of a soverigen nation has the right to talk to leaders of other nations as he or she pleases, am i wrong, spunk?

    and my question to you, then, spunk, is if we are not actually interested in DEMOCRACY and JUSTICE, how does that spin the afghanistan massacre?

    i mean war.

    and eri, macdonalds uses 100% US grade A beef.


By patrick on Tuesday, April 16, 2002 - 02:47 pm:

    this article on the ouster from the Dow Jones perspective sums up nicely why the coup was good for the US.

    Of course now Ari Fleischer is backpeddling saying they didnt view it as a "coup" but rather a culmination of bad policy.


By eri on Tuesday, April 16, 2002 - 03:17 pm:

    Patrick, you are showing your ignorance to the McDonalds issue. It was a lawsuit in Missouri. It is on record. Alpo sued the meat company in relation to the bad beef and when it was tracked down where the meat went it was at McDonalds. True story. The attorney who worked on the case for Alpo was my cousin. It was even on the news in 1993. Thanks for playing. Have a nice day.


By patrick on Tuesday, April 16, 2002 - 03:32 pm:

    i didnt say ANYTHING about the McDonalds matter eri, that was nate!!!


By eri on Tuesday, April 16, 2002 - 04:29 pm:

    Oops, my bad. Sorry Patrick.

    Nate, see above mentioned post!!! ;)


By Spider on Tuesday, April 16, 2002 - 04:40 pm:

    Patrick, did you let out a yelp of outrage when you read that?


By patrick on Tuesday, April 16, 2002 - 05:19 pm:

    hmmmm

    im not really sure. i should ask my colleagues around me.

    you find me amusing don't you?


By spunky on Tuesday, April 16, 2002 - 05:47 pm:

    "i think the democratically elected leader of a soverigen nation has the right to talk to leaders of other nations as he or she pleases, am i wrong, spunk?" no, of course you are not. but you are baiting me, aren't you?

    "and my question to you, then, spunk, is if we are not actually interested in DEMOCRACY and JUSTICE, how does that spin the afghanistan massacre?"

    “We have found out . . . that we cannot trust some people who are nonconformists,” declared Ray Kroc, one of the founders of McDonald’s, angered by some of his franchisees. “We will make conformists out of them in a hurry . . . The organization cannot trust the individual; the individual must trust the organization.”


    Hmmm, looks like Ray KROCK (perfect last name) summed it all up.


By spunky on Tuesday, April 16, 2002 - 05:53 pm:

    I find you amusing, Patty.


    I am not really interested in how to define the "afganistan masacre" until we finish up with defining the "WTC Masacre".....
    I dont really give a flying fuck what spin you wanna put on it. look at them now, after the pashtun and the northern aliance beat the taliban. what happens? oh my god, they are still killing each other!!! they are still saying death to Americans!!!
    Same goes for most of the people in pakistan and india and palestine and isreal and iraq and iran.
    No body likes us, and that is fine. We are not or should not be in the "like me" business. we should be worried about our stakes and our interests in the first place, other nations stakes and interests secondly.
    Cold hearted? yes.
    Realistic? You bet your ass.
    No one, but no one is the better for wiping someone else's ass before their own.


By spunky on Tuesday, April 16, 2002 - 05:55 pm:

    and that is all i have to say about that.
    RUN FOREST RUN!

    Don't tempt me to release the one legged space chickens!!!!


By patrick on Tuesday, April 16, 2002 - 06:12 pm:

    the Pashtun didnt defeat the Taliban. The Taliban was mostly Pashtun.

    "we should be worried about our stakes and our interests in the first place, other nations stakes and interests secondly"

    this attitude is what causes hate to fester. Unfortunately, whether you like it or not, we are the worlds largest consumer, economic superpower, military superpower. What we do (or DON'T do) has the potential to shake the world.


By Antigone on Tuesday, April 16, 2002 - 06:14 pm:

    “We will make conformists out of them in a hurry . . . The organization cannot trust the individual; the individual must trust the organization.”

    This is exactly why we can't let corporations take over government.

    And, spunkster, being realistic doesn't mean you've got to be cold hearted.


By patrick on Tuesday, April 16, 2002 - 06:34 pm:

    I read a book in college called the McDonaldization of Society. Reveals what a creep Ray Kroq was and how much of an impact his assembly line food service on society as a whole. Good business man, but tiggy's right.


By Fetidbeaver on Tuesday, April 16, 2002 - 07:54 pm:


By spunky on Tuesday, April 16, 2002 - 09:15 pm:

    " Unfortunately, whether you like it or not, we are the worlds largest consumer, economic superpower, military superpower. What we do (or DON'T do) has the potential to shake the world.
    "

    That was my point.
    Listen, and listen well.
    We have been spending the last 2 decades appoligizing for our success and worrying about all these countries and all of their problems.
    We attempted to help. That festered hate. We stood back and that festered hate.
    What did it get us? 2 planes smashing into the WTC, killing thousands of INNOCENTS. Because, supposedly, we helped some and not others.
    If it had been reversed, then someone else would have done it.
    I am not saying issolation, that would be economic suicide.
    But dammit, the only one that is going to watch out for the US is the US. And, if that includes meddling in other countrie's leaderships, then so be it.

    The only one we owe any appoligies to is the Palastines, for selling arms to Isreal.


By Nate on Tuesday, April 16, 2002 - 09:23 pm:

    why do we owe apologies to the palestinians?

    israel is the only democracy in the region. we've supplied weapons for their defense.

    or why ONLY the palestinians? turkey is the largest purchaser of US arms in the world. every heard of the kurds? do you have any idea how they are treated in turkey?

    you can get hung for speaking the wrong language.

    is that happy?

    the fact that we are assholes to the world is what 'festers hate'.

    open your eyes, spunkmaster.


By eri on Tuesday, April 16, 2002 - 10:07 pm:

    FB, that was hillarious. It tried one and it came up that genocide was due to the fact that the world was controlled by the KKK and they were assisted by african-americans with additional support from the homosexual community. They were responsible for the falling of the berlin wall in Uzbekistan (sp?) which lead to Pearl Harbor. To accomplish this they stabbed Catholic priests and any other restance hostage in the New York sewers keeping them trapped by S.U.V.'s. Apparently you could find them easily, because they snort root beer. Also the news is controlled by Hillary Clinton, so if you want a point of view that is not tainted by the african-american, homosexual portion of the KKK you have to ask George W. Bush. I couldn't copy the whole thing (yes, I am computer stupid), but thought the link was hillarious.


By Fb on Tuesday, April 16, 2002 - 10:27 pm:

    plausible?


By Narscist on Tuesday, April 16, 2002 - 11:31 pm:

    We are Capitalist Pigs.


By A-Political Daniel ssss on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 01:17 am:

    But the illegal Puerto Rican cooks in Gary Indiana use 100% pure cat raised in the streets and killed by SUV's filled with overpriced pertoleum products tankered into the Great Lakes by former skippers of the Exxon Valdeeez. Oh the beef of that fair city.

    Doesn't mean we all have to be Repulsican, nor Dumbocrat.


By Arubadan on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 01:18 am:

    AND the only thing good about Venezuela might be the old cars and the pickpockets.


By heather on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 03:13 am:


By Danielssss on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 09:04 am:

    Okay okay...

    Isla de Margarita, 40km (25mi) from the mainland, is a favorite for beach-lovers and a popular holiday destination for Venezuelans...

    and there are better examples of 17th C. cathedrals you think?

    I can sit there marvelling at the Cathedral looking up to God and Her Architects, while some US emigrant picks my pockets and drives off in a 68 Edsel.

    I think it was the abundance of old old US cars that struck me odd. My travelling buds spent some time in Caracas, and I declined the invitation to accompany, and sat on the crime free beaches of that happy little island of Aruba...

    Caracas is not a very safe town. Although, the entire country is not very safe, unless compared to Columbia...where one best be packing a side arm to go to la tienda o los locos cantinas.

    Carpe foreigner!


By spunky on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 10:05 am:

    Nate,
    I think we both point out the truth.
    Surprising? No. The international fabric is
    just as confusing and convoluted as ever, and there really is no innocents left (except the pigmies maybe, but I am sure they are oppressing someone).
    There is no right side and no wrong side today.
    The Israelis have the right to defend themselves, and the Palestinians have the right to defend themselves. Both should be treated as sovereign nations.


By heather on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 11:01 am:

    there are no wrong side


By drpy on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 01:51 pm:

    no, there is no right side.

    there are only wrong sides.

    everything is wrong.

    life will be so much easier when you accept this.


By Spider on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 02:21 pm:

    Why live?


By Antigone on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 02:27 pm:

    Why not?

    What, you have to be right to live? I find that life can be pretty interesting when you're wrong.

    Being right is boring as hell.


By Weird Al on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 02:34 pm:

    Everything you know is wrong
    Black is white, up is down and short is long
    And everything you thought was just so important doesn't matter
    Everything you know is wrong
    Just forget the words and sing along
    All you need to understand is
    Everything you know is wrong


By Spider on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 02:40 pm:

    Always being right = boring. Sure...

    But sometimes? A few times? Having the possibility of being right?

    Always being wrong = boring.


By drpy on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 03:01 pm:

    being wrong can be exciting. it can open you up to possibilities of change and growth, make you more accepting of others, more flexible in solving problems, good company, etc.

    sometimes, not always.

    being right can make you inflexible, close-minded, an elitist snob, a terrorist, etc.

    sometimes, not always.

    and i never understood "why live?" or "a reason to live."

    we need to get in touch with our inner wrongness.


By heather on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 03:02 pm:

    so the wrong side are the right side, no?


By drpy on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 03:06 pm:

    i don't claim to understand the wrongness. i'm only its servant.


By spunky on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 03:07 pm:

    no, yes


By Antigone on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 03:25 pm:

    "so the wrong side are the right side, no?"

    Maybe.


By Antigone on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 03:26 pm:

    My cat is drooling on my firewire hard drive, btw.


By heather on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 03:31 pm:

    my cat is firing on my drooling by the way drive. hard.


By patrick on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 04:35 pm:

    my cat is driving my fire by the way. drool hard.


By Antigone on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 04:55 pm:

    My cat drives the way my hard drool is firing on by.


By wisper on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 05:30 pm:

    holy shit spunky.
    That pic you linked to (at the top of this) damn
    near killed me. I'm still giggling. The earth is
    the tear!!! it just keep getting better! That's the
    tripest tripe that ever triped! Awesome. You
    made my day.
    i want a poster.


By heather on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 07:11 pm:

    what a weird fold-y eye


By spunky on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 07:57 pm:

    i liked it


By semillama on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 10:14 pm:

    Is it too late to say,

    In order to understand knee-jerk
    libertarianism you need to realize that
    everything is controlled by twat-fiddlers made
    up of subgenii with help from the rotarians.

    The conspiracy first started during the sinking
    of the Bismarck in Dobbstown. They have
    been responsible for many events throughout
    history, including Patrick discovering
    marijuana.

    Today, members of the conspiracy are
    everywhere. They can be identified by pope-
    fondling.

    They want to smite the Righteous Brothers
    and imprison resisters in Jerry Bruckheimer's
    house using camels.

    In order to prepare for this, we all must
    skydive. Since the media is controlled by
    Antigone we should get our information from
    Spunky.

    hmmm....


By Nun_of_that on Thursday, April 18, 2002 - 12:08 am:

    "Pope-fondling"
    harharhar


By spunky on Thursday, April 18, 2002 - 08:16 am:

    ah semi


By drpy on Thursday, April 18, 2002 - 11:50 am:

    "there is some very, very stuff fishy going on."

    - mark thomas


By spunky on Thursday, April 18, 2002 - 02:10 pm:


By patrick on Thursday, April 18, 2002 - 02:14 pm:

    saw that. they say it looks like an accident.

    i have an old dear friend who lives and works in Milan. Hoping she's ok.

    otherwise, fuck the news.

    hockey playoffs are on.


By spunky on Thursday, April 18, 2002 - 02:40 pm:


By patrick on Thursday, April 18, 2002 - 02:59 pm:

    the day that happened, the press i read said it was mostly likely a bomb based on eye witness reports.

    there are eye witness reports in Milan saying the plane was on fire first and there were distress calls from the pilot.


By LoneStranger on Thursday, April 18, 2002 - 07:23 pm:

    Look! De plane! De plane!

    LS


By spunky on Friday, April 19, 2002 - 11:06 am:


By spunky on Friday, April 19, 2002 - 11:07 am:

    If you are going to be that much of a pussy over money, you should leave others out if it, for God's sake. He killed 3 people and injured 36 other.
    How fucking selfish


By Nate on Friday, April 19, 2002 - 11:25 am:

    kind of hypocritical there, trace. you being an american and all.


By spunky on Friday, April 19, 2002 - 11:44 am:

    What, americans who kill themselves take out 3 others and injure 36 more?
    I sure do not think I would do that.


By eri on Friday, April 19, 2002 - 12:01 pm:

    The thing that gets me is that with 30 years experience, he should have been able to handle this problem. If it was about suicide, he should have just landed the plane unsafely killing himself. I don't really understand this one.

    Killing others in order to commit suicide has nothing to do with being American. It more resembles the Kamikaze pilot, without the religious or political convictions.


By patrick on Friday, April 19, 2002 - 12:32 pm:

    trace i dont believe the guy killed himself and there really is no evidence that he did. the fact he called the tower with this problem tells me it was an accident.

    eri, i've flown, granted with a pilot on hand. You have no idea what it takes to "handle" an unidentified problem. They say it was his landing gear but people are saying it was on fire before it hit the building. who knows at this point.

    If you ever felt 2-3 g-force of a plane in a 60 or 90 degree bank (i have) you can begin to understand how difficult it is to deal with mechanical problems while possible going out of control.



By spunky on Friday, April 19, 2002 - 12:52 pm:

    ""It was a suicide, a suicide, do you understand?" Luigi Fasulo's son, Marco — a pilot for the airline Swiss Air Lines — told the Rome newspaper La Repubblica Friday."
    "The Italian air traffic controller's association said the pilot did not issue a distress signal, as previously reported."
    "The tower tried to put him into a holding pattern to the west of the tarmac, but the pilot turned north instead, the authority said."


    It is an awesome looking skyscraper, by the way


By patrick on Friday, April 19, 2002 - 01:09 pm:

    ok


    according to the same article:


    "The National Aviation Authority said Fasulo radioed the control tower at Milan's Linate Airport to report "a small problem" with his landing gear as he was approaching the airport tarmac to land"

    "When the tower contacted the pilot again to inform him he was making "improper manoeuvres," he told officials he was trying to fix the problem with the landing gear so he could land, and that was the last time the tower was able to reach him."

    "Milan fire brigade officials have said the plane was on fire as it flew into the 32-storey building. "


    your choosing what to pay attention to in order to support your opinion. There's clear indication in that article, two seperate Italian authorities saying that A) the plane was on fire and B) he communicated with the tower on two occassions regarding the trouble


By spunky on Friday, April 19, 2002 - 01:12 pm:

    Same to you and more of it....
    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA


    I dunno, truth is I doubt anyone will ever know what really happened. maybe there was no problem with his landing gear, he was actually beating off and crashed into the building (no where near flight plan or landing strip, why would a problem with the gear cause him to completely change his course verses go into a "holding pattern?).


By spunky on Friday, April 19, 2002 - 01:15 pm:

    Same to you and more of it....
    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA


    I dunno, truth is I doubt anyone will ever know what really happened. maybe there was no problem with his landing gear, he was actually beating off and crashed into the building (no where near flight plan or landing strip, why would a problem with the gear cause him to completely change his course verses go into a "holding pattern?).
    The man was an experienced piolot. I am sure, at some point and time, there was some sort of training involving landing a plane with faulty landing gear. I doubt he was stupid enought to be so engrossed in the problem that he did not pay attention to where the plane was flying. And who is to say he did not set the plane on fire himself, before crashing into the building? He did not contact the tower for 2 minutes prior to hitting the building


By patrick on Friday, April 19, 2002 - 01:36 pm:

    that last paragraph is absurd because A) you've never flown B) why would he set the plane on fire

    the landing gear is electrical, its entirely possible an electrical problem started a fire.

    Even the best of pilots go down.

    Cat, when done shagging her self silly in Hong Kong, can back me up on this. You have no idea what happened, whether he was engrossed in the problem or not.

    Say his gear locked up, electrical system caught fire, he lost hydraulics, couldnt steer, couldnt do anything. It IS Milan's tallest building for crissakes man. He may have had no control what so ever. Its probably not as simple as his gear being stuck.

    Everything we know thus far says nothing about committing suicide. Being in debt is not substantial enough.


By patrick on Friday, April 19, 2002 - 01:36 pm:

    and the fact that the plane was on fire prior to crashing tells me it wasnt pilot error either.


By spunky on Friday, April 19, 2002 - 01:38 pm:

    God, you are so full of yourself.
    Seriously.
    You are hard to talk to about anything.
    Once you have made up your mind, you get damn adamit about it.
    Almost take the fun out of debate


By patrick on Friday, April 19, 2002 - 01:43 pm:

    maybe. but im trying to be as objective as possible homeboy.

    and yes i know everything. god dammit havent you learned that by now.


By patrick on Friday, April 19, 2002 - 01:48 pm:

    if you makes you feel better. i can pretend i don't know anything about flying planes and discuss this with you.










    it was total terrorism, all the way. al Qaida promised him eternal debt free salvation if he did this.


By spunky on Friday, April 19, 2002 - 01:49 pm:

    Yea Yea Yea (or is it ya ya ya or yah yah yah or yeah yeah yeah)


By spunky on Friday, April 19, 2002 - 01:49 pm:

    Well, he is out of debt anyway


By spunky on Friday, April 19, 2002 - 01:52 pm:

    one more thing, why would his son say it was suicide? if he is a business PERSON, not to mention pilot, would he not have life insurance?
    assuming he did, don't most policies become void if he commits suicide?
    it stands to reason that his son would inherit at least some of that policy, unless he hated his son and left him out of it. in which case his son would lie about it so no one else could benefit from it


By patrick on Friday, April 19, 2002 - 02:25 pm:

    his son is probably derranged.


By Antigone on Friday, April 19, 2002 - 03:18 pm:

    The plane was shot down. SHOT DOWN, I tell you! The evidence is irrefutable!!


By Spider on Friday, April 19, 2002 - 03:34 pm:

    This is Italy we're talking about. Do they even have life insurance over there? Do they have a president today, or prime minister, or supreme dictator, or...?


By patrick on Friday, April 19, 2002 - 03:38 pm:

    according to my friend, the country is governed by a consortium of spaghetti chefs with checkered pants.


By spunky on Friday, April 19, 2002 - 03:43 pm:

    What???
    Has anyone told Mario?????
    Mama Mia!!!


By Spider on Friday, April 19, 2002 - 03:45 pm:

    Shoot, they can't even figure out how to stand in line -- how can they organize themselves enough to have a stable system of government?


By eri on Friday, April 19, 2002 - 03:55 pm:

    He lived in Switzerland by the border of Italy is what it said in the article.

    Patrick, why are you assuming that I don't know anything about flying a plane or what is expected of a pilot during any part of the flying process? Why are you assuming I have never flown?

    For someone who thinks they know it all you do way too much assuming.


By patrick on Friday, April 19, 2002 - 04:05 pm:

    Im not assuming eri. Im working off what you say.

    this

    "The thing that gets me is that with 30 years experience, he should have been able to handle this problem"

    says enough.

    You really don't the details of the problem. All im working off of is that A) he said he had gear trouble B) he was on fire.

    Im not making a leap by speculating (based on those two reported facts) that he might have an electrical problem, not getting the gear down subsequently loosing hydraulics, thereby loosing entire control of the plane thereyby slamming into the tallest building in the vicinity. Im trying to use deductive reasonsing. You aren't.

    I don't really know if you have flown or not.

    I've flown one of these with the assistance of an Air Force Trainer and one of these with another Air Force trainer and my step-grandpa on several occassions.


By wisper on Saturday, April 20, 2002 - 10:31 pm:

    i'm going to go out on a limb here and say that
    anyone who isn't a pilot with 30 years
    experience wouldn't know.

    that means- none of you.

    now play nice. i hate to see my loved ones
    fight.


By Nate on Saturday, April 20, 2002 - 11:38 pm:

    i can fly without the assistance of any puny machine. you fucking mortals make my laugh.

    i'm with antigone. the guy was obviously shot down.


bbs.sorabji.com
 

The Stalking Post: General goddam chit-chat Every 3 seconds: Sex . Can men and women just be friends? . Dreamland . Insomnia . Are you stoned? . What are you eating? I need advice: Can you help? . Reasons to be cheerful . Days and nights . Words . Are there any news? Wishful thinking: Have you ever... . I wish you were... . Why I oughta... Is it art?: This question seems to come up quite often around here. Weeds: Things that, if erased from our cultural memory forever, would be no great loss Surfwatch: Where did you go on the 'net today? What are you listening to?: Worst music you've ever heard . What song or tune is going through your head right now? . Obscure composers . Obscure Jazz, 1890-1950 . Whatever, whenever General Questions: Do you have any regrets? . Who are you? . Where are you? . What are you doing here? . What have you done? . Why did you do it? . What have you failed to do? . What are you wearing? . What do you want? . How do you do? . What do you want to do today? . Are you stupid? Specific Questions: What is the cruelest thing you ever did? . Have you ever been lonely? . Have you ever gone hungry? . Are you pissed off? . When is the last time you had sex? . What does it look like where you are? . What are you afraid of? . Do you love me? . What is your definition of Heaven? . What is your definition of Hell? Movies: Last movie you saw . Worst movie you ever saw . Best movie you ever saw Reading: Best book you've ever read . Worst book you've ever read . Last book you read Drunken ramblings: uiphgy8 hxbjf.bklf ghw789- bncgjkvhnqwb=8[ . Payphones: Payphone Project BBS
 

sorabji.com . torturechamber . px.sorabji.com . receipts . contact