I saw three ships come sailing in


sorabji.com: Are there any news?: I saw three ships come sailing in
THIS IS A READ-ONLY ARCHIVE FROM THE SORABJI.COM MESSAGE BOARDS (1995-2016).

By trace on Thursday, February 20, 2003 - 01:43 pm:

    Iraqi 'terror ships' at sea
    By Patrick McGowan, Evening Standard
    19 February 2003

    Three huge cargo ships feared to be carrying Iraqi weapons of mass destruction are being tracked around the world by British and American intelligence.

    The vessels, which have been at sea for three months, are believed to be carrying weapons smuggled out through Syria or Jordan.

    They are all refusing frequent requests to provide details of their cargo or destination and officials are worried that the vessels are maintaining radio silence in clear contravention of maritime law, which states all ships should be in constant communication.

    The rest of the story


By trace on Thursday, February 20, 2003 - 01:44 pm:

    I can hear it now

    This article is just an attempt to cover Blair's ass.
    Right?


By Bigkev on Thursday, February 20, 2003 - 01:59 pm:

    i would have thought that the SEALS or the SAS would be able to takeover control of one (or indeed all three) ship(s) with minimal chance of the crew being able to scuttle it (them). Isnt that the idea that is always implied to the world?

    Oh, wait.... was that propaganda?

    And Really, if they wanted to stop these boats, they would do it and damn the consequences. the fact that this story is in the news means one of two things (to me) either it is a smoke screen for some operation already running, or it is a forerunner to the big story, of the ships being overrun, which may have already happened.

    Oh Orwell, what would you think of these days we live in????


By patrick on Thursday, February 20, 2003 - 02:16 pm:

    we've heard this kind of shit before trace and it added up to be nothing, so this story, at this time, is meaningless.


    you believe whatever supports your limited view.


    note the use of "believed" and "suspected" cargo.

    Until the ships are stopped, searched and verified, this story is about as pointless as Colin Powell's specualtion about those trucks at a weapons site that.


    this story is no reason for war, warmonger


By patrick on Thursday, February 20, 2003 - 02:19 pm:

    and why are you still going on about Blair and the dossier?


    no one is talking about that but you.


    non-issue

    its like you are having a conversation with.....


    whom?


    or just regurgitating comebacks to arguments no one here is having.


By eri on Thursday, February 20, 2003 - 02:37 pm:

    "you believe whatever supports your limited view."

    And you refuse to believe whatever supports your limited view.


By patrick on Thursday, February 20, 2003 - 02:48 pm:

    for someone so hell bent on evidence, trace is sure quick to drop his usual standards when presented with specualtion eri.

    if those boats were stopped, inspected and it was revealed they contained WMDs we'd have an intelligent conversation.

    Until then its speculation.

    You yourself has a habit of reserving judgment until you see evidence.

    There is no proof those boats have what they are speculating they have.

    Non issue.


By semillama on Thursday, February 20, 2003 - 03:05 pm:

    The real issue is what BigKev raised, couldn't we use Allied special forces to nab these ships? I would think that such forces could be deployed from submarines. IF they really think these ships contain WMD, the adminsitration must be salivating at the prospect of exposing them. That would be the evidence they need, and would be indisputable.


By patrick on Thursday, February 20, 2003 - 03:08 pm:

    we've been stopping and inspecting ships for contraband for 12 years in the region. Why are these three any different?


By semillama on Thursday, February 20, 2003 - 03:31 pm:

    Because they are one of the following:
    A. full of nasty chemicals
    B. full of Olsen twins paraphrenilia
    C. ghost ships
    D. a ploy to scare up fear and paranoia
    E. carrying Anna Nicole Smith's lunch.


By jack on Thursday, February 20, 2003 - 03:37 pm:

    F. made entirely of goat cheese


By patrick on Thursday, February 20, 2003 - 03:39 pm:

    mmmmmmmm B.

    Option B all the way.



By moonit on Thursday, February 20, 2003 - 04:05 pm:

    They better not have my pants.


By semillama on Thursday, February 20, 2003 - 06:20 pm:

    Saddam has your pants. Thats the REAL reason we are going in. (George has a secret crush on you)


By patrick on Thursday, February 20, 2003 - 06:24 pm:

    hot pants?

    cause thats what im thinking. a boatload of pink and purple Olsen twin hot pants.


    its a part of Larry Flynt's Hot Pants for Oil program


By trace on Thursday, February 20, 2003 - 06:45 pm:

    so predictable.


By patrick on Thursday, February 20, 2003 - 06:58 pm:

    you just wish you thought of the Hot Pants For Oil program chump.


By trace on Thursday, February 20, 2003 - 07:30 pm:

    yup


By Rowlf on Thursday, February 20, 2003 - 07:37 pm:

    G. holding auditions for "Arabian Idol"

    CBS News actually put a lot into perspective for me tonight, saying specifically:

    Iraqis have always been masters of hiding everything, and
    US intelligence provided to UN inspectors is quote "garbage, garbage and more garbage. Either out of date, circumstantial, or just plain wrong"

    So unless the former actually has something and makes a mistake or the latter gets its act together, the inspections need more time to work.


By moonit on Thursday, February 20, 2003 - 08:00 pm:

    I guess its not a secret anymore Sem : )

    You couldnt _pay_ me enough to do your leader.

    Although a lifetime supply of reeses peanut butter cups is very tempting.

    ugh no


    can't do it


By Dubya on Friday, February 21, 2003 - 09:22 am:

    What if I sweeten the deal and name a missle system after you, honeybunches?


By Antigone on Friday, February 21, 2003 - 12:24 pm:

    trace, why don't we board the ships and inspect them?

    Give us some facts, man!


By patrick on Friday, February 21, 2003 - 12:37 pm:

    or rather some low level civilian employee water cooler speculation


By Rowlf on Friday, February 21, 2003 - 05:02 pm:

    this type of situation has been rumored last month, except it was 15 Al Qaeda ships, but noone made too much a stink about it. The Al Qaeda rumor is apparently more credible, but I haven't seen any follow up on that story, so...

    you never know, some of these new "terror ships", if they exist, could actually be the previously rumored Al Qaeda ships. If they turn up and someone tries to use it as evidence: its yet another thing to question: "Are they Iraqis or Al Qaeda? Prove it."

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A56442-2002Dec30&notFound=true


By Rowlf on Friday, February 21, 2003 - 05:07 pm:

    ...while we're on the topic of wild, inprobable, yet interesting rumors...

    http://www.rense.com/general35/bal.htm

    note the term "Exclusive story". I love looking at conspiracy theory sites, but I hate how despite having a "question everything" attitude, they tend to believe everything, no matter how farfetched, so long as its on 'their' site.


By wisper on Friday, February 21, 2003 - 06:16 pm:

    when something's in 16pt font, you KNOW it's true!

    anyway, shouldn't you people all be out buying duct tape?

    i know i said that on another thread but WTF. Are they serious?
    Did any of you buy duct tape? Has anyone? Will anyone? I can't get over that shit. Duct tape! that'll save your ass! Duct tape of freedom. Soon they're going to start printing it with stars and stripes i bet.


    oh my god, duct tape. Your grandchildren are never going to believe that one.
    Fucking hell.


By eri on Friday, February 21, 2003 - 06:41 pm:

    What's worse was when I first saw that and didn't know what the hell it was.


By trace on Friday, February 21, 2003 - 08:20 pm:

    "trace, why don't we board the ships and inspect them?

    Give us some facts, man!"

    "or rather some low level civilian employee water cooler speculation"

    or
    "...while we're on the topic of wild, inprobable, yet interesting rumors... "

    Take your pick.

    The facts are concrete. There are 3 of them.
    They have refused to identify themselves and have been tracked since they left Egypt.

    I have seen no official traffic as to specifically why they have not been intercepted. There are standing orders not to engage, but rather to watch.
    I tend to agree with the view that it is because of the fact that if they are what we beleive they are, they crew may indeed scuttle the ship.

    I just cant understand one thing


By jack on Friday, February 21, 2003 - 09:37 pm:

    ...just one thing? And what would that be?


By patrick on Saturday, February 22, 2003 - 12:22 pm:

    facts.

    3 of them
    last left an Egyptian port
    not answering the damn phone


    Warm the jets.


    TERRORISTS!!!!



    eri you didnt know what duct tape was?

    and you gave me shit for not knowing some TV baby character?


    sheeesh.


By eri on Saturday, February 22, 2003 - 03:14 pm:

    I said it was funny. I expect to get shit about not knowing what duct tape looked like. I wasn't trying to give you shit about the Daria thing. I was excited that I actually knew something like that for a change. Most of the time when people here talk music or television I am lost.


By moonit on Saturday, February 22, 2003 - 04:14 pm:

    Same Eri, but that might be cause I'm on the other side of the world.

    Well for now anyway. If Trace gets his way I'll be toast crumbs just like the rest of you.


By trace on Saturday, February 22, 2003 - 04:37 pm:

    i dont udnerstand why everyone thinks my way is war.


By jack on Saturday, February 22, 2003 - 09:30 pm:

    is that the one thing you don't understand? you might be able to figure that one out.


By trace on Saturday, February 22, 2003 - 10:34 pm:

    because you do not listen to me


By jack on Saturday, February 22, 2003 - 11:11 pm:

    yes, it must be someone else's fault.


    note: i never said i thought trace's way was war. so i know you're not talking to me.


By moonit on Sunday, February 23, 2003 - 02:44 am:

    I'm thinking he's aiming that at me.

    Trace, you post all these war messages/news stories/scary tales/whatever and then say that you don't get why I (and whoever else) thinks that you want to go to war? I am starting to not watch the news because I am so sick of the bullshit and the threats and it scares me. It fucking scares me that I may never get to meet the people that I really like on these boards, that I won't get to New York for my 30th birthday, that I'll never again have the peanutychocolaty goodness that is reeses peanut butter cups. Aren't you?
    So when I come here to talk shit, the last thing I wanna see is war.
    And yet, thats all you can seem to talk about.


    I'm thinking this post probably didnt make much sense - the Pandyr just about killed me on a HUGE walk up and down tracks, and I hurt now, my brain isn't recieving enough oxygen, and I may not be coherent.


By trace on Sunday, February 23, 2003 - 10:31 am:

    no, my goal is removal of saddam from leadership of Iraq.

    He will choose how he leaves.
    I would prefer he put a cap in his skull.
    Or maybe lock himself in a sauna with those chemicals he says he does not have but says he will unleash on the US...

    Or we can go in and blow up a couple of his palaces that were built with money sent to Iraq to feed and medically treat the civilian population.


By semillama on Sunday, February 23, 2003 - 12:46 pm:

    Not to mention the collateral damage on a nation where half of the population is under 15 years old.

    But I suppose our adminstration would simply say, "Nits make Lice."


By trace on Sunday, February 23, 2003 - 12:58 pm:

    neither me nor the admin said that.
    Interesting that you did, however.


By semillama on Sunday, February 23, 2003 - 12:58 pm:

    Plus, what a lot of folks are also angry about is that Bush's administration is making no effort to do a "Marshall Plan" - there is no realistic plan to introduce democracy. It's just like what he said to teh firefighters and police after 9/11, and to the people of Afghanistan after we invaded - "he said a lot of stuff about helping out, but whoops, funds are being cut to fire and police departments nationwide, and Bush sort of forgot to include any money for helping Afghanistn rebuild in his joke of a budget ( you know, the budget that doens't include any money for the upcoming war?)

    Bush is well on track to become one of the biggest American embarrassments since, well, Hoover (of course, Hoover didn't have as large a percentage drop in the stock market during his tenure...) He IS doing a pretty damn good job of making his dad's presidency seem pretty good in comparison.


By moonit on Sunday, February 23, 2003 - 01:57 pm:

    'Or we can go in and blow up a couple of his palaces that were built with money sent to Iraq to feed and medically treat the civilian population.'

    Sounds a bit like war to me. But then what do I know. I come from a peaceful pacific country, who refused to let US Frigates come here. Maybe you can start campaigning aginst us next.


By wisper on Sunday, February 23, 2003 - 02:18 pm:

    sure you got reeses peanut butter cups moonit, but did you get any reeses pieces?? which are like a cross between peanut butter cups and M&Ms?


    want some?


By trace on Sunday, February 23, 2003 - 03:45 pm:

    Moonit, where are you from?


By moonit on Sunday, February 23, 2003 - 03:58 pm:

    Are you teasing me wisper?? I do trade for kiwi candy.... ; )




By trace on Sunday, February 23, 2003 - 04:08 pm:

    NZ, right?


By moonit on Sunday, February 23, 2003 - 04:29 pm:

    Thats where you find Kiwi's yes.

    Why?


By trace on Sunday, February 23, 2003 - 04:33 pm:

    just curious


By trace on Sunday, February 23, 2003 - 04:41 pm:

    i love fresh kiwi in a fruit salad
    I bet they taste much better right of a tree in the yard


By moonit on Sunday, February 23, 2003 - 04:59 pm:

    a. Kiwifruit grow on vines.
    2. I don't know anyone who grows them.

    I buy them at the supermarket just like you do. The gold ones are sweeter and nicer than the green.


By trace on Sunday, February 23, 2003 - 07:05 pm:

    ooop
    i never said I was a fruitologist...

    We had peach trees when we lived in kansas, and they beat the ones you bought at the store ten times from no where


By eri on Sunday, February 23, 2003 - 08:23 pm:

    I am going to have to watch for the gold kiwi now. All I need is kiwi and oranges for a fresh fruit salad spunky likes.


By moonit on Sunday, February 23, 2003 - 09:34 pm:

    www.zespri.com

    Not sure if we are exporting the gold to America. Its targeted towards the asian market.

    How the hell do I know this crap? Honestly, its like my brain picks the strangest things to remember and won't function with usual, everyday things.


By jack on Sunday, February 23, 2003 - 10:14 pm:

    isn't the NZ-kiwi thing a reference to the birds?


By moonit on Monday, February 24, 2003 - 01:49 am:

    uh a kiwi is a kind of bird, yes - its unique to New Zealand. A kiwi can also be a kiwifruit, or chinese gooseberry.

    It's educate an american day today. Any more questions? ;)


By semillama on Monday, February 24, 2003 - 09:27 am:

    Where are my socks?


By patrick on Monday, February 24, 2003 - 11:24 am:

    yes. tell us about your natural resources.


    (trace get your note pad, thumbtacks and maps ready)


By moonit on Monday, February 24, 2003 - 02:04 pm:

    Sem, I hate to tell you but the Washing Machine Monster will have eaten one, never to return, the other is probably right under the middle of your bed, not in arms reach. Socks are bastards for that.


    Our natural resources... hmmmm, energy (coal and gas), water (Christchurch's water comes right off the alps - comes sparkling out of your kitchen taps), and our forestry. There's also our food resources, lamb, beef, deer, cereals - exported to most of the world.
    The south island has greenstone too.

    Anything else?


By semillama on Monday, February 24, 2003 - 02:15 pm:

    Peter Jackson.


By moonit on Monday, February 24, 2003 - 02:40 pm:

    He rocks. Have you seen Meet the Feebles?

    By the way, my pants turned up six days after ordering, they fit perfectly, and they cost me $70(NZ). I am happy!


By patrick on Monday, February 24, 2003 - 02:40 pm:

    yes.


    is it true that Kiwi's take butt sex an average of 6.5 times more than their American counterparts when propositioned

    (Aussies reportedly take anal an average 17 times more than their American counterparts)



By kazoo on Monday, February 24, 2003 - 02:41 pm:

    I've seen Meet the Feebles.


By moonit on Monday, February 24, 2003 - 02:41 pm:

    Thats an interesting question Patrick.

    I'm not too sure of the answer, however if I do a quick tally up of all the guys I've dated, and how many mentioned wanting to, then you could be right.


By moonit on Monday, February 24, 2003 - 02:43 pm:

    Everytime we play mini-golf, the Pandyr has to replay the scene of running with his golf club to the invisible *whatever it was* and smacking it.

    He's a sick little puppy.


By Nate on Monday, February 24, 2003 - 04:48 pm:

    you ever get four seasons in one day?


By moonit on Monday, February 24, 2003 - 05:07 pm:

    Like that crowded house song?
    Yes its possible.

    Even without plane travel.


By semillama on Monday, February 24, 2003 - 05:11 pm:

    Four seasons in one day is always fun.


By trace on Monday, February 24, 2003 - 05:35 pm:

    we got close enough to that here.
    yesterday almost 80.
    today, 40.


By wisper on Monday, February 24, 2003 - 06:31 pm:

    oooooOOOooooo 40!

    however will you survive the tundra-like conditions? you may have to put on a long shirt! wanna borrow some mittens?

    *giggle*


    moonit: no i am not teasing you. Send forth the kiwi candy with all speed! email me damn you! i need candy NOW!


By Big bored kev on Monday, February 24, 2003 - 06:55 pm:

    i dont know cel. to far. conversions so this is in deg.cel.

    Calgary Alberta.
    Yesterday -23deg. (daytime high)
    today +4 (daytime high)
    No chinook, that Im aware of (thats a warm southern wind that frequents this area)
    I have lived here for less than 2 years, and have seen snow in every month and (at least) +10 in every month too.

    Like the locals here say, if you dont like the weather, wait ten minutes.
    OR
    4 months of bad sledding and 8 months of poor sun-tanning


By eri on Tuesday, February 25, 2003 - 09:45 am:

    The funny thing is that it got down to 27 last night and you could hear the ice and sleet hitting the windows. There was 1 inch of ice on everything this morning (cars, roads, bridges, etc.). They closed the schools and shut down all of the freeways (the 410 and I-10 and I-35) because of the threat of ice on the bridges. It is snowing in Austin from what I hear. The high today is 38 and it is currently still 27 outside. People are afraid to go out. It's almost funny.


By The Watcher on Tuesday, February 25, 2003 - 12:00 pm:

    I've had enough snow for this year.

    Twenty eight inches last week. And, more on the way.

    I'm ready for spring.


By eri on Tuesday, February 25, 2003 - 02:48 pm:

    I am in TEXAS and there are icecicles (sp?) hanging from the carports! People are freaking everywhere. This is hillarious. People outside are dressed like they are getting ready to work on some polar caps. It's 30 outside! Better pull out the parkas and scarves and down blankets!

    I'll admit that it is cold, but this is crazy. It's not THAT cold.

    People watching in this weather (it is not typical for Texas but still) is too funny.

    Of course, all of the trees are brown and dead looking. That is the thing I hate most about winter weather. Everything looks dead. It's depressing.


By semillama on Tuesday, February 25, 2003 - 04:17 pm:

    That's why I don't want to ever live where this no snow in the winter. With snow, at least it looks like wniter and looks clean and pretty.


By patrick on Tuesday, February 25, 2003 - 04:38 pm:

    thats what they all say upon arriving in SoCal.

    after 6 months they are saying how much they never want to leave.


By eri on Tuesday, February 25, 2003 - 04:45 pm:

    I loved SoCal. I would go back if we were transferred there.

    In Missouri, even after it snows, you still see the dead trees. It looks stark. I hate winters there. Of course, the snow never stays white for long. It gets all muddy and brown and ugly.

    I guess Cali winters spoiled me, because you still have life out there. It doesn't get ALL brown or dead.

    We were just getting our spring with the grass greening again and growing again. Buds on the trees, flowers growing. Now it is all dead, in two days, dead.

    The icecicles are funny, because they seem so out of place.

    I still can't believe they shut down and closed all of the freeways.


By semillama on Tuesday, February 25, 2003 - 06:15 pm:

    I go through snow withdrawls here in the south.


By semillama on Tuesday, February 25, 2003 - 06:15 pm:

    But lately I have been satisfied.


bbs.sorabji.com
 

The Stalking Post: General goddam chit-chat Every 3 seconds: Sex . Can men and women just be friends? . Dreamland . Insomnia . Are you stoned? . What are you eating? I need advice: Can you help? . Reasons to be cheerful . Days and nights . Words . Are there any news? Wishful thinking: Have you ever... . I wish you were... . Why I oughta... Is it art?: This question seems to come up quite often around here. Weeds: Things that, if erased from our cultural memory forever, would be no great loss Surfwatch: Where did you go on the 'net today? What are you listening to?: Worst music you've ever heard . What song or tune is going through your head right now? . Obscure composers . Obscure Jazz, 1890-1950 . Whatever, whenever General Questions: Do you have any regrets? . Who are you? . Where are you? . What are you doing here? . What have you done? . Why did you do it? . What have you failed to do? . What are you wearing? . What do you want? . How do you do? . What do you want to do today? . Are you stupid? Specific Questions: What is the cruelest thing you ever did? . Have you ever been lonely? . Have you ever gone hungry? . Are you pissed off? . When is the last time you had sex? . What does it look like where you are? . What are you afraid of? . Do you love me? . What is your definition of Heaven? . What is your definition of Hell? Movies: Last movie you saw . Worst movie you ever saw . Best movie you ever saw Reading: Best book you've ever read . Worst book you've ever read . Last book you read Drunken ramblings: uiphgy8 hxbjf.bklf ghw789- bncgjkvhnqwb=8[ . Payphones: Payphone Project BBS
 

sorabji.com . torturechamber . px.sorabji.com . receipts . contact