THIS IS A READ-ONLY ARCHIVE FROM THE SORABJI.COM MESSAGE BOARDS (1995-2016). |
---|
|
i agree with sarah. |
|
|
|
I have lots of stuff on it, but I'll have to fuck with the formatting before I can post it in a legible form. I'll track down some links too. |
protesterdude: like, the wto sucks. protesterchick: i know! totally! isn't this great? dude: yeah, cos like, the air and stuff is like, so important to us all. chick: oh, i agree. corporations are evil. dude: free mumia. chick: god, you are so cool! what are you doing after the protest? dude: hangin' out. chick: here's my cell phone #, call me later. i have to go. i told my friend, alicia, i'd meet her at starbucks. call me, ok? promise? dude: all right. later. |
seattle's mayor paul schell just set a cerfew for the city from 7pm until dawn. he has also declared a civil emergency! |
|
Basically, these guys protest all noble causes. You need to go past the first few pages, but once you find the part about the WTO, it's really informative. The only real news not really, actually--but they do present a clear idea of the protests, etc. Because I'm a fair kind of person. Not a whole lot of links...but somewhere to start. Try searching here. Google's really good. |
|
|
Isolde, Thank you for the links. Gotta go. My cab's here. |
I was there for the gulf war and rodney king verdict protests. I was headed out with some friends. they were going to the rodney king thing and I was going home to get my cat to take to the vet. I stopped waiting for them, though, when it became clear that krystal was not going to protest anything until she got her waterproof mascara on perfect. |
you don't see images like that streaming across the vid too often. those people shut that city down. tv shot from right outside my old downtown apartment building showed throngs of people filling the streets. looks like a thin line between drunk and righteous. it'll be interesting to see what happens when the curfew drops and the national guard rolls in. i bet it all gets really messy really quick. like within the next 45 minutes. i keep thinking that if the protests were happening in NYC (and had the same effect on manhattan that they're having on seattle), giuliani would be orchestrating the kind of brutal spectacle america hasn't seen since chicago '68. but of course that would never happen. if the WTO conference had been held in NYC, nobody would have cared. |
|
|
|
|
|
Anyone know what's up in Seattle? I'm down here hiding berefit of a TV and can't find any by the minute updates online. |
what makes you think that you know more protesters than _________? just curious. i have to say that i find you to be the queen of blanket statements. what an obnoxious thing to say. |
|
|
i know 6 protesters. none of them are hippies and five of them work in unions and all of them are over the age of 38. i have no idea if any of them drink starbucks. |
try this one for some info as well. http://seattle99.org/ |
Is it true that the mayor of nyc had all the homeless folks "moved" out of the city? |
I heard he paid canada to take them. |
something like 65K people protested the WTO yesterday in seattle, the number of vandals was in the 100's. a very small percentage. the swedish wto guy (what do they call them? delegates?) said that the fact that so many people came out and that they were successful in delaying the start of the conference made an impact on the delegates. in other words "fuck you all, but nice try." the WTO is basically trying to keep up with international trade. i heard someone liken it to a guy being run out of town standing tall and marching to make it look like he was leading a parade. the problem is that they have the opportunity to set up rules and guidelines that would be in the best interest of the people, but they're ignoring it. ignoring is probably not the right word. |
|
"what makes you think you know more protesters...{yada yada yada, pity party for ___}" Let's start with the first question. I went to my first march on Washington when I was 6 and went to peace vigils before that. I grew up in the Left, in a very politically active community. My parents' friends were regularly doing social justice work in Guatemala or doing time for civil disobedience. Since being in California, I have gotten in touch with the activist community here. _____ is pretty right wing, and is quoting from any of hundreds of right-wing articles opposing citizen activism. So, what, he read Rush Limbaugh's book? This enables him to understand why people got involved? He doesn't sound like somebody who would spend a lot of time in the activist community, (unless, of course, he's a narc) And before you jump down my throat (and on the bandwagon... can we say "sheep", boys and girls?), the only blanket assumption I'm making there is that people don't usually hang out with people they don't like. |
|
|
|
http://www.peacecenter.com/issues/global/index.html This is Peninsula Peace and Justice Center's WTO page. And they are evidently not ineffectual hippies. "Peninsula Peace and Justice Center has been one of the most effective of the activist organizations" - Noam Chomsky They are organizing a noviolent protest against the police brutality going on there today. "Wednesday, December 1, gather starting at 4:30 PM Office of Rep. Anna Eshoo, 698 Emerson Street, Palo Alto (Corner of Emerson and Forest, 2 blocks south of University Avenue)" As this is kind of local, I'll include this handy suggestion. They also suggest that you: "Call the White House and condemn the repression of peaceful protestors. The White House swtichboard is 202-456-1111." And a letter from the front is below: Greetings from Seattle, I was at the demo today -- will send out a full report soon -- but for now, i just want to say that reports of police brutality are not exaggerated. Many are in fact grossly underestimated. I didn't get anything worse than tear gas, but police have been beating with riot sticks peaceful protestors who sat or lay on the ground. They have taken protestors who were wearing face masks, covered the inside of the mask with pepper spray and forced it back onto the person's face. They dragged an elderly woman across the ground by her hair and an arm. They've shot rubber bullets at ranges of a few feet, and one officer pulled a real gun on protestors before other officers restrained him. In addition, police have _not_ been arresting protestors to any extent -- I heard 18 arrests the whole day -- they have simply been attacking us. Now the mayor has declared a state of civil emergency, set a 7 pm curfew dowtown, and called out the National Guard. So if you can make it to the Palo Alto demo tomorrow, <please> do. (info below if you missed it) NO WTO! In solidarity, {name excised} > > |
Doesn't that sound like a great party? Look, maybe Cyst's friend is shallow, but that doesn't necessarily indicate that all protesters are. I know a lot of protesters who are simple livers, buy no new clothes, and don't wear makeup. Besides the fact that one contributes by one's presence whether or not one has a pure enough attitude for some guy who isn't there and is just speculating/bitching about it online. |
yeah i heard the labor march was very impressive, some 40k people from the stadium to downtown or whatever, the fuckers breaking windows, smashing shit and lighting cars on fire is definitely detracting from the point, but the fucking pigs and their rubber bullets and tear gas need to check themselves, cops can be real testy when they are outnumbered by such a large proportion.....remember, any dumbass can become a cop..... |
Why don't you take up a cause of all your own....like Pete Rose needs some help...maybe you could get him into the Hall of Fame where he belongs. btw...were you molested as a child? |
teargas or whatever device suits ones tempo of the moment. Whether they be protesters or police,these methods,cannot, never have, nor ever will be effective. Which ever "side",[ and I use this term lightly ], one chooses to identify with, can easily see the "folly", and "dangerous" aspect of the "opposing" side, but yet remains so short-sighted as to be unable to recognize the very same tactics in their own "group", Oh, but excuse me, I forgot, that these tactics are necessary, the "other side", forced us to behave that way, so therefore it must be acceptable. Does not every coin have 2 sides???????Has anyone ever studied history? The lessons are right there, accesable in black and white, to any who have the desire to enlighten themselves--------but golly-gosh-darn, that just wouldn't be half as much fun as going out there and rioting/protecting,and justifying these tactics with a self righteous " I'm right and your wrong" attitude. There is, and always will be, just one way to deal with a fox, YOU MUST OUT-FOX HIM. or maybe just contact Ms. Kathy-Lee Gifford, and get her input on this situation, I believe she might just have some inside info. |
Fuck you, Patrick. Why don't you storm off again... and see if you can make it stick. Fuck you, Maple Leaf. Didn't you used to post as Scorpio FH? I've barely spoken to you and you come on here to harrass me. You *are* jumping on the bandwagon and it makes me sick. I'm hoping that Nate will retain some sense of dignity about this. AS I SAID, I DON'T THINK THAT ____, FROM HIS POST, SOUNDS LIKE SOMEBODY WHO WOULD HANG OUT WITH ACTIVISTS, BECAUSE HE OBVIOUSLY DOESN'T LIKE THEM VERY MUCH. |
|
A good general page: http://www.lbbs.org/CrisesCurEvts/Globalism/GlobalEcon.htm And Chomsky on WTO: http://www.lbbs.org/zmag/articles/may97chomsky.html |
I feel that it is rather foolhardy to dismiss one of the largest acts of civil disobedience in the history of our country as a bunch of partying college students. This is cops brutalizing college students in huge numbers, all in the name of Corporate America. This is serious. |
|
|
No. I have only posted as ML.....I don't follow anyone around....you show up spewing venom everywhere you go and I view all boards. Just so you know. |
This type of activism is INDEED warranted. They are fighting a recognizable, organized institution sanctioned by gov'ts worldwide. Activism against the mindset of the individual is what i called useless....do you see the difference? |
|
|
Don't talk to me. |
hey, rhiannon, I thought "just so you know" was mine. but it doesn't matter because I'm going to try not to say it anymore. just like a.s. byatt should stop using the word "indefatigable" in "possession," the book I'm reading. page 28. she's used it three times so far. that chick who was late getting to the protest because she was putting on her makeup doesn't represent seattle activists on the whole, but her type makes up a large percentage. the ones who go to protests to see and be seen. I'd say they comprised about a third of the crowds for the major protests in seattle in the early '90s (flag-burning law, gulf war, rodney king). |
|
isn't that interesting. looks like anyone who supports the protests is in bed with the devil. |
The only thing the US higher ups are worried about is the possibility that one or two of the WTO's provisions could be applied to them (they don't want to have to give up their protectionism, just force other gov'ts to accept shoddy, overpriced goods). However, as this hasn't happened with any UN decision so far, most of the gov't knows they don't have to worry. BTW: for an example of the US's approach to UN legislation read "Umbrella of US Power" by Noam Chomsky. It's about how the US has used the Universal Declaration of Human Rights against other countries, and fostered massive violations in client states (as well as committing quite a few). |
|
Hence the laws against consensual crimes. Consensual crimes are things that lead to people thinking bad thoughts. You keep thinking those bad thoughts, you'll fuck up the whole reality-tunnel they're trying to cram everybody into. That's why they're still trying to find a way to pers- I mean prosecute thoughtcrimes on the Net. |
|
1. ________ is dave, who lives with me, who is about as left wing as they get. we live in an extremely liberal town. we have extremely liberal friends. one of our best friends is the head of washpirg. we also know conservative people. we like them both. you don't know him, and you are judging him based on what he writes, which i know is all that you have to go on. my point is that you cannot assume that you know anything about someone based on what they post on a bbs. give me a break. 2. i am not joining any kind of club, in fact i find you to be admirable both in terms of your intelligence and your commitment to what you believe in. i'm sure if i met you, i would like you. but sometimes, lucy, you just have to chill out a little. it really makes life hard to be angry all of the time. i think that we probably agree on a lot more than you would believe. 3. my dad's a jew. half of my relatives are jews. i am only stating this because i feel like you tend to stereotype people and place them in groups. i have been stereotyped and pigeonholed more times than i can even count. i just try to keep everything in perspective, and get along with people as best i can. in the end, it makes my life more pleasurable. i feel like people are innately good and dependable, for the most part. in return for treating people kindly and fairly, i generally get treated with kindness and respect. when i don't, i shrug it off and move on. your anger seems to be consuming you, and although i don't know you, it concerns me all the same. peace. |
WTF I am seriously considering walking off of the boards because of Patrick's petty harassment and you think that I am going to sit still when you join in the fun? As for my comments about yr boyfriend, I assumed he didn't like activists b/c he said all of those nasty things about them. If you say nasty things about a group of people, those people, and other people will think you don't like that group of people. |
|
|
Anyway, maybe it would help tone things down if we all tried to respond to her ideas and not her anger. If that's possible. |
The reason that I may be a bit sharp with people is that Ratprick's constant harassment has truly pissed me off. He seems proud of himself for it. NOBODY but him hounds people all over the boards whenever they argue with him. He's done this shit to me twice and to Heather once. It's out of line. The thing that really bugs me is that everybody else is joining in, which greatly lowers my opinion of you. Repeat after me, all of you: Four legs good, two legs ba-a-a-d |
first off the bitch running the show had her head so far up her ass, she actually thought she was "producing" something. The first three bits were unbearable, I had to bite my lip to keep from laughing........some kid got up with an electric guitar and a distortion pedal that he had no idea how to use and he mutilated a couple of Jay Mascisusususususu (spell?) tunes. He should have been flogged right away but thats not in the spirit of things right? When it was finally our tune, it actually came out well. Sam read an Angry Sam installment and I had some bongos and a rib tickler to back him up. It was good, called Bebop Mexico, i hope to post it soon. Anyway, the bitch producer and some other performance artist lady asked me to do a percussion gig with them at a jazz improv gig.....i was really really irritable at the time, i really only did it for sam, and I remember why i stopped going to open mike nights, especially at a coffee house, god i needed a drink so bad, to deal with it all... think i could have gotten higher at the NA meeting going on downstairs. Sam was takin belts from a flask, I should have been tipped by him. Eitherway, these people are supposed to be calling me, i dunno what to say, I am not really interested, but i have a hard time turning people down. if i am going to be doing any music its going to be the gig with my buddy james, he can play a slide like you wouldn;t believe, it's delta, it's low, it's just me and him, he's good, swingin italian chef/guitar player from brooklyn....with school work and shooting photos in between, i don't have time to paly music these days, i need a house or a loft to set up my kit so i can play at my leisure as oppsoed to paying $10 and hour at some dumpy hollwyood studio ...i don't even own the instruments i used last night, they are sams. i dunno,,,,,i have been kinda irritable since, not sure why, pissoff! |
By any chance was the producer's name 'Lucy'? Just wondering. |
a friend sent this email to me..... "This is the coolest form of online protest I've ever seen. All you have to do is load a web page and let it sit for along as you can. You will be overloading the WTO conference web server, hence a virtual sit-in. Electronic civil unrest. Join the protestors in Seattle while sitting around and scratching your ass:" http://www.gn.apc.org/pmhp/ehippies/action/ http://www.gn.apc.org/pmhp/ehippies/action/> |
>>Subject: From the Front Lines > >Crazy, crazy day. > >Obviously I participated in the WTO protests all day, 8am-7pm. I saw so >much stuff I can't possibly tell you everything but here are some of the >scenes that still have me buzzing. > >I walked downtown from home and the streets were filled by 8:00 am. People >duct-taped themselves to people to prevent the WTO delegates from entering >the downtown area. Every corner had a separate chain and protest taking >place. And this was before any of the big planned actions. And obviously >it was successful, we shut down the city and the WTO for the day! > >Right away when I got into the thick of downtown (all the streets are closed >to traffic) I saw a full-on SWAT mobilization. Machine guns and all. I >hear sirens in a mass of people and look behind just as three of four cars >and five or six motor cycles are rolling towards me on the sidewalk. They >passed and stopped 10 feet in front of me. The SWAT team jumped out of >their SUV's and were all dressed in black, with equipment to the tilt, and >ran single file two city blocks with machine guns and big cans of pepper >spray or whatever it was. I, of course, chased them to see what was up. >They surrounded a cop car where they had detained someone and started >pushing the crowd back. A stand off for about 15 minutes ensued and then >that was the end of that. Real tough guy stuff though. And this was >before breakfast. The rally is still five hours away. > >The march was great, so many labor activists, human rights activists, >indigenous groups, environmentalists, etc. So peaceful and so full of >positive energy. Actually I started by marching with around 3000 student >activists from Seattle Central Community College and the UW before meeting >up with the big march. The rain was slowing and the sky was turning blue. >That was amazing, a great, great vibe. Peaceful and happy solidarity is the >best way to describe it. > >We then met up with the "big march" and proceeded slowly downtown. It was >cool. Parade-like but different. Real casual. But there I was, Yonkers >boy gone environmentalist rubbing elbows with Old Lady Mae from the Local >International Service Workers Union, the 541 International Steelworkers >union, Vietnamese Peace Action groups, etc etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. I mean >it, so many unions, causes, groups, etc. represented. > >The images of the whole day are so vibrant, yet the craziness that took >place after the march was nothing I have ever experienced. > >The streets were alive. Starbucks was busted up, Radio Shack busted up, >anti-WTO graffiti everywhere. "Fuck Corporate America" spray painted on Old >Navy. Nike was so trashed. The letters N I K E were mangled. They were >tough-looking steel letters above the doorway and they were so worked over. >People took over downtown, sitting on top of bustops, busses, store awnings, >climbing telephone polls, blocking off all of the streets with human chains >and dumpsters and fires in garbage cans. Thousands of people with signs, >puppets, props, and other creative protest paraphernalia. Total party >atmosphere, like when the parents go away kind of thing. Music was blasting >and people were sitting, marching, chanting, locking themselves to >mini-stages, singing and whooping it up. > >Then the cops came. Or at least they decided to push through and take some >of the streets back. Uh-oh. > >It was like what you see go on in Israel on tv, yet less violence from the >people. Overall, I got tear-gassed about 4 or 5 times. "Concussion bombs" >overhead and stinging gas in your eyes and nose with people yelling and >screaming and 25 cops rattling their clubs against their shields as they >pursue you down a street is quite an experience. I felt like I was being >hunted almost. They kept pursuing the crowd and using all this ammo to keep >us running. You would turn around and see them with their rifles drawn >shooting rubber bullets at people that wouldn't run from them. No warnings, >no message, no words at all. Just an offensive assault. > >I was shell shocked but couldn't leave. I couldn't see, bombs were going >off, and people were screaming "this is a non-violent protest, this is a >non-violent protest." >And I have to agree, it really was. It could have gotten way out of hand >but the energy for the most part was non-violent and cool, it was just that >everyone was shocked, but not really panicked. Some people were throwing >bottles, pieces of wood, etc. but it was a very very small minority. > >There were protesters who were really well prepared, medics, legal >observers, nurturers, everything. It's just that the confrontation took >such precedence. It didn't feel like America. But it did because everyone >was standing behind their rights and doing what they feel they had to to >speak their peace and not be bullied away from an important political >action. > >I just couldn't believe that the Mayor or whoever would let the police use >the tactic they used to clear the streets. > >Nutty, nuttiness. The second craziest day of my life. Thank God I am safe >and sound and most others are as well. >What a day. > >I just hope the message gets across. I can't imagine that it won't though. >Who in America will not know what the WTO is? > >Anyway, I must go. The city is under a curfew since 7:00 pm, it is now 9:55 >and I am at work downtown. I will have to make my trip home shortly. I can >still hear the helicopters outside. > >Power to the People :-) > {name withheld}. |
|
For any reason. You don't just do that shit and act like it never happened. I never ever want to read another post from you. |
|
You have hounded me all over the damned boards. When you do shit like that, people don't want to hear from you. Please stop hounding me. Please leave me alone. Please let me be. |
I even tried to talk with you about something entirely unrelated, reagrding you email from your friend in seattle, there was no mention of anything other than the subject at hand and look how you reacted. I can forget all the bullshit and post in a pseudo-friendly fashion with you, despite your name calling, the question is can you? |
Hounding somebody all over the boards because they argued with you on one board is out of line. That is why nobody but you does it (at least until all the sheep joined in). You have done this shit to me once before. I've also seen you pull the same shit with Heather. Clearly, this is S.O.P. for you. As I don't like getting hounded, I am going to avoid the person who does it. Now fuck off. |
|
better yet: go out, buy some perspective, and try to realize that's it's just a fucking message board, man. you don't have to respond to every damn thing some chucklehead motherfucker says. god damn. step back, eat glass, and chill out. the both of you. |
yes sir thank you sir love patrick |
|
I feel so dirty. |
|
your right, my apologies to all |
|
so anyway... is anyone else concerned about the people's right to assemble and protest being taken away? they are blocking off entire parts of the city to people with signs. hello folks. this is pure fascism. just because a few (or more than a few) people were demonstrating violently does not mean that the next day the police and government officials can take away every else's right to assemble and protest. but that is exactly what they are doing. this is illegal. we do not own our own civil liberties any longer. if you are not afraid, then you've been swallowing too much prozac. this is scary shit. |
|
WELL!!! YOU....YOU....YOu....YOu......You.... You ...you............you...........................................nevermind. |
|
"uh NO lucy, i respond to your posts at hand, i don't bring in baggage from elsewhere." And I had to set the record straight: "no baggage, " huh? liar And that's only the beginning of his endless harassment. I hadn't even posted on either thread. |
Another letter from the front: We began Tuesday morning on the U. Washington campus, encouraging students to take part in the campus walk-out. Several hundred people rallied in their equivalent of White Plaza, including a group of Zapatistas!!!, and then we marched across campus and around the university district, waving to people in businesses, and having a great, completely non-violent and non-destructive time. The protest was well-organized, with people appointed as medics, peacekeepers, legal observers, and march leaders, equipped with cell-phones. I saw hundreds of video cameras and normal cameras. Then we joined the march of students coming from Seattle Central Communtiy College, together with the People's General Assembly, the movement for Democracy in Laos, a bunch of Free Tibet people, and members of the Falun Dong/Gong. We congregated by the Space Needle, and then joined up with the labor march. Best estimates I've heard for the labor march are around 30,000 and probably 7-10,000 for the student contingent. I echo the sentiments of others at the amazing feeling of solidarity felt as we walked the streets with the Raging Grannies, the Steelworkers, Amnesty International Chapters, the Radical Cheerleaders, the Lesbian Avengers, the Sierra Club, and Public Citizen. The Warner Brother Co. has statues of Bugs Bunny and Daffy Duck in front of their store, and they were positioned so that protestors could stick signs in the crooks of thir arms and make it appear like they were holding them. We were all amused. Then downtown, where we spotted- for the first time, really- the police. Serious. The police were using tear gas, rubber bullets, nightsticks, and pepperspray. Today, they announced that no one except the police would be allowed to wear gas masks downtown. (To clarify from other e-mails, I do not believe that any of the police used actual bullets- certainly not machine guns- and SWAT teams were not present) Tuesday was only Seattle police, and Wednesday the national gaurd was there. We were right in the middle of everything, by the Sheraton, and there were several attempts to get delegates in and out. Let me stress the fact that the vast majority of protestors were completely non-violent and non-destructive. It's my impression that most of the property damage was due to a group of about 100 anarchists, who broke windows at Starbucks, Banana Republic, and Nordstroms. Some random kid tore down the Nike sign, and basically said when interviewed that he had no idea what was going on, and was just taking advantage of the situation. He was booed and many of the protestors yelled "Shame on You." I really think that most people there were very well-informed and know the arguments for the WTO- and have concluded that people should come before profits. We were teargassed without warning Tuesday around 5 PM, soon after civil emergency was declared. I know of hundreds of people who were peppersprayed, often cases where the protestors were locked down. The issues didn't even seem to be dispersing people, but more just to bother them. Many people arrested without warning, or just for walking down the street in a large group. Two women leaving the United Methodist Church were peppersprayed by police with absolutely no provocation. Estimates of the number of people with minor injuries have been underestimated by the police and the media, as most protestors have been treated by each other, or by the medics there with NGOs. Wednesday we attended a forum on gender issues in world development, including woman who had organized the maquiladoras on the US-Mexico border, a woman who works on micro-grants in Tanzania, a woman from the American south who worked on community development, and a woman from the Phillipines concerned with the "comparitive advantage"'s affect of small farmers and indigendous culture. Then a silent, single-file march down to the police barricades blocking entrace to the no-protest zone downtown. We put tape over out mouths to symbolize the lack of freedom of speech and the general denial of democracic proceeding at the WTO. Very powerful, and no arrests or violence. In the afternoon, a discussion on the General Agreement on Trade and Services, especially on its potential affects of education. Let me also stress that we should focus not only on issues of violence and police brutality, but also the reasons that all of us protestors were there. The WTO is not a democratic institution. No globalization without representatioN! It makes national laws protecting human rights, labor, and the environment harder to enforce, and sets standards ceilings rather than floors. It promotes corporate growth, rather than sustainable , domestically-based development. It promotes un-sustainable industrialization without appropriate technology transfer support. The public was welcoming overall, and the truck drivers we passed seemed to like us a great deal. However, at another protest, someone else told me that a fellow bus-rider complained that the traffic delays from protestors were causing her to "miss Wheel-of-Fortune again." Right. FIGHT APATHY! Educate people about the issues at the WTO! So, Stay tuned for a big "What Happened at WTO" thing next quarter- a bunch of us are trying to get together and present our experiences, pictures, and slides. Its very important that people start thinking about these issues. Thanks for your time! Please call Anna Eshoo (In D.C. 202-456-1111- or look up her local number, sorry I'm tired right now) and express your concern about police brutality against protestors, and identify yourself as an activist concerned with issues at the WTO. Thanks! {name withheld} |
I just had to highlight this. The pigs did this to a bunch of logging protestors last year, only they actually swabbed the stuff onto the people's eyes. A judge upheld it, saying "pain compliance" techniques were acceptable. Can we say "Doublespeak", boys and girls? Disgusting. |
|
|
i don't like violence and disrespect and irresponsible protesting, but in any case, the cops and the government do not have the right to take away people's civil liberties. it's just downright fascist. when those people who live downtown, who are upset about being gassed out of their apartments, eventually lose their jobs due to the global economy and international trade agreements, we'll see who is angry then. |
|
i am kinda divided on the most effective method.....I appreciate the fact that the labor march was looked at so highly because of the peacful nature....... i am certainly against globalization of commerce, or rather the mcdonaldization of the world......but at the same time, the minute private proerty is damaged or perople are injured you should expect the same in return....hell the boston tea party fuckers got a full blown war....subsequently..... |
However, I think that the actions of the police were uncalled for. I will never approve of the use of martial law to prevent dissidents freom expressing their views. And ____ how come your so says you're left wing? I'm sorry if I seem to be jumping to conclusions, but the views that I have seen you express seem to me to be pretty uniformly reactionary. And the fact is that there was a very small number of people breaking things... and a very large number of nonviolent protesters volunteering to repair the damage. F'rinstance, when the anarchists broke the Starbucks window, the nonviolent protestors went and stood there all night to protect it from looting and then a group of them spent the next day sweeping up the glass and scrubbing off the graffiti. And the majority of the protestors were chanting "shame on you" at the destructive ones. The destructive ones are probably mostly (or at least led by) agents provacateur (forgive my bad French, it's not one of my languages) anyway. It certainly wouldn't be the first time such a tactic was used. As a matter of fact, my father was trained in spotting them and preventing them from fomenting violence. I think, were the police not using "pain compliance",tear gas, beatings, and rubber bullets on everybody in the area, the huge number of nonviolent protesters would probably find a way to limit the actions of the violent ones. I have confidence in their ability to find enough people among them trained in de-escalation and passive reesistance techniques to police themselves. And they would do it without brutalizing everyone in sight. |
|
|
I let this drop against my better judgement, and I barely talked Lather out of declaring all-out war on a certain instigator who shall remain nameless. |
i'm tired of typing. gonna get some beer. |
I was actually kind of curious as to whether or not you agreed with her assesment. |
|
|
|
|
|
cheers! |
it's all just shades of gray. dave likes the christmas beer. it gives him pleasure. |
tonight I'm going back to the one restaurant in portland where I've seen a cockroach. it ran across the table. I had to leave. I've since grown up. |
i think the cops have done an outstanding job in performing their crowd control procedures. i'm so sick of this innocent bystander bullshit. if you know there's a riot and you leave your home to go observe it, you know damned well that you're subjecting yourself to risk. tear gas and rubber bullets are unpleasant--unless you compare them to mustard gas and real bullets. i've been gassed a few times, for things like walking home and waiting for the bus. tough shit. that's the risk i take, cos the cops sure as shit aren't going to sit around to find out if i'm a threat before they fend me off. in the midst of chaos, i would do the same thing. cops are humans, just like the poor child laborers in indonesia, and they are scared shitless, just like the poor, innocent civilians. the fucking hypocrisy makes me sick. sorry. i'm not making this speech to anyone in particular. |
Lucy called us a mob and a herd of sheep when many of us asked her to calm down and not be so reactionary. Then she turns around and praises some of the Seattle protestors for chanting "shame on you" at the destructive protestors. Isn't that what we've done with her? Also she's claimed that "the destructive ones are probably mostly (or at least led by) agents provacateur..." Does this mean that actual protestors can not be led to destructive acts simply by their own anger and frustration at the idea, institution, or people they are protesting? I think Lucy is in a state of mind now that she can understand the effects of overflowing anger... |
call it my mob mentality. |
hydrozoa- i don't know what -"intelligent" women- is supposed to mean- but my reading of it is an offensive one. please watch what you say in generalities and stop trying to interpret other people's 'state of mind' |
|
|
|
|
And your little slut camp follower shall be "Jellyfish-snatch" I fucking warned you. You ARE sheep. And you ARE a mob. And I DID give you a second chance, against my better judgement. And I don't want to hear SHIT out of any of you fuckers about it, when the only person who said anything about the inappropriateness of the whiteboys' behavior is Heather. I'm sick and tired of being the only one criticized for a flamewar I tried to let die. When you people make it clear to your little oppressed whiteboy mascots that their behavior is inappropriate, I will let it drop. But if you won't, I will. |
I don't "have to be treated delicately," but I have my limits, and I had been pushed past them by constant hounding long before Atinygon(ad) and Jellyslut started in on me. Oh and Gee did speak up. Thank you those VERY few people on whom it has dawned that maybe hounding somebody to death (even if they are evil because the mob said so) isn't right. Fuck the rest of you sheep. Where's Andy from Scotland when you need him? |
otherwise (oh maw gawdddddd!) |
|
|
|
|
|
I asked you fuckers to stop. I told you I was letting it drop against my better judgement. I came back after a weekend off and found that you had decided to restart it. I wash my hands of you fuckers. L-We're having mutton for dinner, baby-baby. |
|
|
And, as for my sweetie's name, I admit to nothing. |
|
Lucy Phurre ceases to be worth it. i tried, i honestly did. |
|
Susan Seddon Boulet did a whole book of goddess paintings, and the one for the goddess Rhiannon was neat. I have a print of it from a calendar on my wall. The little paragraph that went with it says: "Rhiannon is the Welsh underworld goddess. Her name derives from Rigantona, which means 'great queen.' She is an embodiment of life, death, and rebirth, for in her realm there is no death without regeneration. A shape shifter, she can assume any form she wants and often appears as a white horse. She is a muse goddess and is accompanied by three sweet-singing birds who can revive the dead or put the living to sleep. In later myth she appears as Nimue or as Vivien, the Lady of the Lake. Rhiannon is a beautiful queen of the night, reminding us of the close balance between death and rebirth. She points the way to our instinctual and animal selves as a source of creativity, abundance, and order." Shameless self-promotion, I know, but I thought that was nice. Not everyone is named after a goddess. ;) |
It's not paranoia when you ARE constantly under attack. And perhaps I am less than forgiving, but I would like to see ANYBODY go through what I've been through and still have something nice to say to ANY of the participants. You guys have endless powers of empathy when the person being empathized with is a middle class white male. |
Disclaimer: I include this in the interest of representing all views, as a first amendment exercise, and also as a curiosity. My decision to provide this information in no way constitutes an endorsement of their activities. N30 Black Bloc Communique by ACME Collective 10:48am Sat Dec 4 '99 A communique from one section of the black bloc of N30 in Seattle On November 30, several groups of individuals in black bloc attacked various corporate targets in downtown Seattle. Among them were (to name just a few): Fidelity Investment (major investor in Occidental Petroleum, the bane of the U'wa tribe in Columbia) Bank of America, US Bancorp, Key Bank and Washington Mutual Bank (financial institutions key in the expansion of corporate repression) Old Navy, Banana Republic and the GAP (as Fisher family businesses, rapers of Northwest forest lands and sweatshop laborers) NikeTown and Levi's (whose overpriced products are made in sweatshops) McDonald's (slave-wage fast-food peddlers responsible for destruction of tropical rainforests for grazing land and slaughter of animals) Starbucks (peddlers of an addictive substance whose products are harvested at below-poverty wages by farmers who are forced to destroy their own forests in the process) Warner Bros. (media monopolists) Planet Hollywood (for being Planet Hollywood) This activity lasted for over 5 hours and involved the breaking of storefront windows and doors and defacing of facades. Slingshots, newspaper boxes, sledge hammers, mallets, crowbars and nail-pullers were used to strategically destroy corporate property and gain access (one of the three targeted Starbucks and Niketown were looted). Eggs filled with glass etching solution, paint-balls and spray-paint were also used. The black bloc was a loosely organized cluster of affinity groups and individuals who roamed around downtown, pulled this way by a vulnerable and significant storefront and that way by the sight of a police formation. Unlike the vast majority of activists who were pepper-sprayed, tear-gassed and shot at with rubber bullets on several occasions, most of our section of the black bloc escaped serious injury by remaining constantly in motion and avoiding engagement with the police. We buddied up, kept tight and watched each others' backs. Those attacked by federal thugs were un-arrested by quick-thinking and organized members of the black bloc. The sense of solidarity was awe-inspiring. THE PEACE POLICE Unfortunately, the presence and persistence of "peace police" was quite disturbing. On at least 6 separate occasions, so-called "non-violent" activists physically attacked individuals who targeted corporate property. Some even went so far as to stand in front of the Niketown super store and tackle and shove the black bloc away. Indeed, such self-described "peace-keepers" posed a much greater threat to individuals in the black bloc than the notoriously violent uniformed "peace-keepers" sanctioned by the state (undercover officers have even used the cover of the activist peace-keepers to ambush those who engage in corporate property destruction). RESPONSE TO THE BLACK BLOC Response to the black bloc has highlighted some of the contradictions and internal oppressions of the "nonviolent activist" community. Aside from the obvious hypocrisy of those who engaged in violence against black-clad and masked people (many of whom were harassed despite the fact that they never engaged in property destruction), there is the racism of privileged activists who can afford to ignore the violence perpetrated against the bulk of society and the natural world in the name of private property rights. Window-smashing has engaged and inspired many of the most oppressed members of Seattle's community more than any giant puppets or sea turtle costumes ever could (not to disparage the effectiveness of those tools in other communities). TEN MYTHS ABOUT THE BLACK BLOC Here's a little something to dispel the myths that have been circulating about the N30 black bloc: 1. "They are all a bunch of Eugene anarchists." While a few may be anarchists from Eugene, we hail from all over the United States, including Seattle. In any case, most of us are familiar with local issues in Seattle (for instance, the recent occupation of downtown by some of the most nefarious of multinational retailers). 2. "They are all followers of John Zerzan." A lot of rumors have been circulating that we are followers of John Zerzan, an anarcho-primitivist author from Eugene who advocates property destruction. While some of us may appreciate his writings and analyses, he is in no sense our leader, directly, indirectly, philosophically or otherwise. 3. "The mass public squat is the headquarters of the anarchists who destroyed property on November 30th." In reality, most of the people in the "Autonomous Zone" squat are residents of Seattle who have spent most of their time since its opening on the 28th in the squat. While they may know of one-another, the two groups are not co-extensive and in no case could the squat be considered the headquarters of people who destroyed property. 4. "They escalated situations on the 30th, leading to the tear-gassing of passive, non-violent protesters." To answer this, we need only note that tear-gassing, pepper-spraying and the shooting of rubber bullets all began before the black blocs (as far as we know) started engaging in property destruction. In addition, we must resist the tendency to establish a causal relationship between police repression and protest in any form, whether it involved property destruction or not. The police are charged with protecting the interests of the wealthy few and the blame for the violence cannot be placed upon those who protest those interests. 5. Conversely: "They acted in response to the police repression." While this might be a more positive representation of the black bloc, it is nevertheless false. We refuse to be misconstrued as a purely reactionary force. While the logic of the black bloc may not make sense to some, it is in any case a pro-active logic. 6. "They are a bunch of angry adolescent boys." Aside from the fact that it belies a disturbing ageism and sexism, it is false. Property destruction is not merely macho rabble-rousing or testosterone-laden angst release. Nor is it displaced and reactionary anger. It is strategically and specifically targeted direct action against corporate interests. 7. "They just want to fight." This is pretty absurd, and it conveniently ignores the eagerness of "peace police" to fight us. Of all the groups engaging in direct action, the black bloc was perhaps the least interested in engaging the authorities and we certainly had no interest in fighting with other anti-WTO activists (despite some rather strong disagreements over tactics). 8. "They are a chaotic, disorganized and opportunistic mob." While many of us could surely spend days arguing over what "chaotic" means, we were certainly not disorganized. The organization may have been fluid and dynamic, but it was tight. As for the charge of opportunism, it would be hard to imagine who of the thousands in attendance _didn't_ take advantage of the opportunity created in Seattle to advance their agenda. The question becomes, then, whether or not we helped create that opportunity and most of us certainly did (which leads us to the next myth): 9. "They don't know the issues" or "they aren't activists who've been working on this." While we may not be professional activists, we've all been working on this convergence in Seattle for months. Some of us did work in our home-towns and others came to Seattle months in advance to work on it. To be sure, we were responsible for many hundreds of people who came out on the streets on the 30th, only a very small minority of which had anything to do with the black bloc. Most of us have been studying the effects of the global economy, genetic engineering, resource extraction, transportation, labor practices, elimination of indigenous autonomy, animal rights and human rights and we've been doing activism on these issues for many years. We are neither ill-informed nor unexperienced. 10. "Masked anarchists are anti-democratic and secretive because they hide their identities." Let's face it (with or without a mask)--we aren't living in a democracy right now. If this week has not made it plain enough, let us remind you--we are living in a police state. People tell us that if we really think that we're right, we wouldn't be hiding behind masks. "The truth will prevail" is the assertion. While this is a fine and noble goal, it does not jive with the present reality. Those who pose the greatest threat to the interests of Capital and State will be persecuted. Some pacifists would have us accept this persecution gleefully. Others would tell us that it is a worthy sacrifice. We are not so morose. Nor do we feel we have the privilege to accept persecution as a sacrifice: persecution to us is a daily inevitability and we treasure our few freedoms. To accept incarceration as a form of flattery betrays a large amount of "first world" privilege. We feel that an attack on private property is necessary if we are to rebuild a world which is useful, healthful and joyful for everyone. And this despite the fact that hypertrophied private property rights in this country translate into felony charges for any property destruction over $250. MOTIVATIONS OF THE BLACK BLOC The primary purpose of this communique is to diffuse some of the aura of mystery that surrounds the black bloc and make some of its motivations more transparent, since our masks cannot be. ON THE VIOLENCE OF PROPERTY We contend that property destruction is not a violent activity unless it destroys lives or causes pain in the process. By this definition, private property--especially corporate private property--is itself infinitely more violent than any action taken against it. Private property should be distinguished from personal property. The latter is based upon use while the former is based upon trade. The premise of personal property is that each of us has what s/he needs. The premise of private property is that each of us has something that someone else needs or wants. In a society based on private property rights, those who are able to accrue more of what others need or want have greater power. By extension, they wield greater control over what others perceive as needs and desires, usually in the interest of increasing profit to themselves. Advocates of "free trade" would like to see this process to its logical conclusion: a network of a few industry monopolists with ultimate control over the lives of the everyone else. Advocates of "fair trade" would like to see this process mitigated by government regulations meant to superficially impose basic humanitarian standards. As anarchists, we despise both positions. Private property--and capitalism, by extension--is intrinsically violent and repressive and cannot be reformed or mitigated. Whether the power of everyone is concentrated into the hands of a few corporate heads or diverted into a regulatory apparatus charged with mitigating the disasters of the latter, no one can be as free or as powerful as they could be in a non-hierarchical society. When we smash a window, we aim to destroy the thin veneer of legitimacy that surrounds private property rights. At the same time, we exorcise that set of violent and destructive social relationships which has been imbued in almost everything around us. By "destroying" private property, we convert its limited exchange value into an expanded use value. A storefront window becomes a vent to let some fresh air into the oppressive atmosphere of a retail outlet (at least until the police decide to tear-gas a nearby road blockade). A newspaper box becomes a tool for creating such vents or a small blockade for the reclamation of public space or an object to improve one's vantage point by standing on it.. A dumpster becomes an obstruction to a phalanx of rioting cops and a source of heat and light. A building facade becomes a message board to record brainstorm ideas for a better world. After N30, many people will never see a shop window or a hammer the same way again. The potential uses of an entire cityscape have increased a thousand-fold. The number of broken windows pales in comparison to the number broken spells--spells cast by a corporate hegemony to lull us into forgetfulness of all the violence committed in the name of private property rights and of all the potential of a society without them. Broken windows can be boarded up (with yet more waste of our forests) and eventually replaced, but the shattering of assumptions will hopefully persist for some time to come. Against Capital and State, the ACME Collective "Peasant Revolt!" ------------- Disclaimer: these observations and analyses represent only those of the ACME Collective and should not be construed to be representative of the rest of the black bloc on N30 or anyone else who engaged in riot or property destruction that day. |
One more factoid randomly given unto the world. |
I read somewhere that my name in reality is related to Demeter somehow, but I haven't seen that anywhere since then, so it's possible I may have misread. I used to hate my name. Some names I used to wish were mine: Daphnie, Kate, Amy, Wendy. |
#1. Today is the 58th anniversary of the bombing of Pearl Harbor. #2. Seattle police chief Norm Stamper (interesting last name) announced his resignation this morning. #3. here is a letter from Michael Moore. (people of sorabji.com... *please* tell me you know who Michael Moore is): December 7, 1999 Dear Friends, They never knew what hit them. They had assumed it would be business as usual, the way it had been for decades. Rich men gather, meet, decide the fate of the world, then return home to amass more wealth. It's the way it's always been. Until Seattle. On the morning of November 30, 1999, as government officials from 135 nations attempted to meet with the largest gathering ever of corporate executives, tens of thousands of average everyday working Americans shut down the city of Seattle and physically prohibited the hoped-for historic and official merger of the earth's political and business elite. I was there. I saw it first-hand. It was a sight I had never seen. But there it was. It was a massively representive body of Americans (and Canadians and Brits and French, etc.), all of us standing there on the streets between Pine and Pike -- Teamsters and turtle-lovers, grandparents and Gap clerks, the homeless and computer geeks, high school students and Alaskans, nuns and Jimmy Hoffa, Jr., airplane mechanics and caffeinated slaves from Microsoft. A few were professional protesters, but the majority looked as if this was their first exercise in a constitutionally protected redress of grievances. There were no "leaders," no "movement," no idea of what to do except stop the World Trade Organization from holding its secret meeting. Only the anarchists seemed organized. They even had their own anarchist marching band! The big labor march grew so large (that's what happens when so many workers are temps), it broke into six or seven separate marches, choking off the entire downtown area of Seattle. The beauty of all this is that it just happened. And why should anyone be surprised? After two decades of downsizing, wage stagnation, lost health benefits and the deliberate destruction of the middle class, the bubble sooner or later had to burst. The Fortune 500 brought this on themselves. If they hadn't been so greedy, if they had been willing to share even a sliver of the pie, then maybe Seattle wouldn't have happened. But the rich decided to take a piss on their biggest supporters -- their loyal workers, those Reagan Democrats -- and there's nothing uglier than a Teamster who voted for Nixon realizing he's been had. It was funny watching how the media presented the Battle of Seattle ("violent protests" was the mantra), and while a McDonald's and a Starbucks had their windows broken, the truth was that 99% of the participants destroyed no property and took great pains to treat the city of Seattle with endearing respect. Seattle is, after all, the only city in the history of this country to have a general strike (the entire town refused to show up for work back in 1919). The liberal mayor of Seattle, who at first did not want to be known as a West Coast Mayor Daley, eventually lost his cool and let his police force run amok. Tear gas and rubber bullets started flying toward the grandparents and the nuns. All civil liberties were suspended. They even had the audacity to use the term, "no protest zones." Hey, this is America, buddy! Seattle may be considered one of those groovy "Pacific Rim" cities, but that doesn't make it Singapore. Clinton came to town on the second day. He was so badgered by the protests, he ended up committing a sin so serious, it was like he was burning his draft card all over again. He completely changed his position and called on all WTO countries to enact laws prohibiting trade with nations that use children in sweatshops and do not honor the rights of all workers to organize a union. Whoa! You see, free trade is an absolute with the WTO (e.g., trade must never be used as a tool to accomplish "social" goals). So, for Clinton to climb the space needle (or was he chased up it?) and then declare that the human rights of workers were more important than making a buck, well, this was nothing short of Paul being knocked off his horse and seeing Jesus! You could almost hear the collective seething of the hundreds of CEOs gathered in Seattle. Their boy Bill -- the politician they had bought and paid for at so many coffee klatches and Lincoln Bedroom stays --- had betrayed them. You could almost see them reaching for their Palm Pilots to look up the phone number of The Jackal. It was a tremendous victory for everyone who lives from paycheck to paycheck. We owe a lot to those brave souls who got arrested and spent the rest of the week in jail. This is by no means the end of Big Business. The richest 1% still own 90% of everything in this world. They will not go down without a fight. But they have been put on notice that people from all walks of life have had their fill and will not let up until we have a fair, just, and democratic economy. This week, Seattle was the Lexington and Concord of a movement that now cannot be stopped. Mark it down, this last great, important date of the 20th century -- November 30, 1999 -- The Battle of Seattle, the day the people got tired of having to work a second job while fighting off the collection agents and decided it was time the pie was shared with the people who baked it. Yours, Michael Moore |
|
but maybe he did. i dunno. i didn't bother to stick around and find out. |
Thursday, 12-2-99, 11:10 AM: Ireland's delegate to the WTO appears on KIRO radio with Dave Ross. Dave asks: can the WTO change laws passed by the U.S. Congress? Her answer: "Yes." |
|
|
Good. That's as it should be. And Moore's letter rocks! |
don't make me come over there. |
|