In The American Grain


sorabji.com: The Stalking Post: In The American Grain
THIS IS A READ-ONLY ARCHIVE FROM THE SORABJI.COM MESSAGE BOARDS (1995-2016).

By patrick on Thursday, September 12, 2002 - 07:57 pm:

    One of the essays in this William Carlos Williams book ive been reading thats got me all wound up.

    I though there were some poignant remarks in this. At least a fantastic read...







    VOYAGE OF THE MAYFLOWER

    THE Pilgrims were seed of Tudor England's lusty blossoming. The flamboyant force of that zenith, spent, became in them hard and little. Among such as they its precarious wealth of petals sank safely within bounds to lie dreaming or floating off while the Restoration throve, a swel.tering seclusion of the hothouse, surrounded by winter's cold.

    In those little pips a nadir, sure as the sun, was reached, in which lay the character of beginnings in North America. As particles stripped of wealth, mortifying as they were mor.tified, "predicateurs," greatly suffering, greatly prepared to suffer, they were the perfect sprout for the savage continent God had driven them to. But Puritans, as they were called, if they were pure it was more since they had nothing in them of fulfillment than because of positive virtues.

    By their very emptiness they were the fiercest element in the battle to establish a European life on the New World. The first to come as a group, of a desire sprung within themselves, they were the first American democracy and it was they, in the end, who would succeed in making everything like themselves. No man led them; there was none. The leaders had failed long since for them at home‹if there ever had been any and those still at home were still more removed from them than ever. Stripped and little they came resting on no authority but the secret warmth of their tight locked hearts. But, unhappily, never had they themselves nor has any one pene.trated there to see what was contained. The emptiness about them was sufficient terror for them not to look further. The jargon of God, which they used, was their dialect by which they kept themselves surrounded as with a palisade. They pleaded weakness, they called continually for help (while working shrewdly with their own hands all the while), they asked protection but the real help had been to make them small, small and several, several and each as a shell for his own "soul." And the soul? a memory (or a promise), a flower sheared away to nothing.

    Theirs is the secret of fairy tales, the descent of the "soul" into picturesque smallness: children, dwarfs, elves; the diminu.tive desires of the lowly for they scarcely know what. The "God" of the Pilgrims is redolent of these mysteries. All their fears, their helplessness, the uncertainty of their force have the quality of such lore. The pathetic detail of the rough sailor who cursed the poor people and what happened to him is strongly in this mood. It shows also the collective sense of the destiny common to lowly people.

    From the outset they had had trouble, then the account goes on.‹"These troubles being blowne over, and now all being compacte together in one shipe, they put to sea again with a prosperous wince, which continued diverce days together, which was some incouragement unto them; yet according to ye usuall maner many were afflicted with sea sickness. And I may not omit here a spetial worke of God's providence. Ther was a proud and very profane younge man, one of ye seamen, of a lustie body, which made him the more hauty; he would allway be contemning ye poore people in their sickness, and cursing them dayly with grecous execrations, and did not let to tell them, that he hoped to cast halfe of them over board before they came to their journey's end, and to make merry with what they had; and if he were by any gently reproved he would curse and swear most bitterly. But it pleased God be.fore they came halfe seas over, to smite this yong man with a greeveous disease, of which he dyed in a desperate maner, and so was himself ye first yt was throwne overboard. Thus his curses light on his owne head; and it was an astonishment to all his fellows for they noted it to be ye just hand of God upon him."

    The dreadful and curious thing is that men, despoiled and having nothing, must long most for that which they have no and so, out of the intensity of their emptiness imagining they are full, deceive themselves and all the despoiled of the world into their sorry beliefs. It is the spirit that existing nowhere in them is forced into their dreams. The Pilgrims, they, the seed, instead of growing, looked black at the world and damning its perfections praised a zero in themselves. The inversion of a Gothic Calvin.

    For the Puritans there had been a decline of which it was their miserable fate never to know, while they raised their holy incantations. These are not the great flower of the spirit. Purged by hard experience (worn bodies from which a white dove springs), they are not all soul as they and we have imagined. Bodily suffering was more an alleviation than otherwise, a distraction that kept them mercifully blinded. They were condemned to be without flower, to sow themselves basely that after them others might know the end. Each shrank from an imagination that would sever him from the rest.

    And so they stressed the "spirit" for what else could they do? And this spirit is an earthly pride which they, pride.less, referred to heaven and the next world. And for this we praise them, instead of for the one thing in them that was valuable: their tough littleness and weight of many to carry through the cold; not their brokenness but their projection of the great flower of which they were the seed.

    The Pilgrims were mistaken not in what they did, because they went hard to work with their hands and heads, but in what they imagined for their warmth. It could not have been otherwise. But it is sordid that a rich world should follow apathetically after. Their misfortune has become a mal.feasant ghost that dominates us all. It is they who must have invented the "soul," but the perversion is for this emptiness, this dream, this pale negative to usurp the place of that which really they were destined to continue.

    This stress of the spirit against the flesh has produced a race incapable of flower. Upon that part of the earth they occupied true spirit dies because of the Puritans, except through vigorous revolt. They are the bane, not the staff. Their religious zeal, mistaken for a thrust up toward the sun, was a stroke in, in, not toward germination but the confinements of a tomb.

    Everything attests their despoiled copdition: the pitiful care for each one, the talk of the common wealth (common to all alike, so never the proud possession of any one) and the church‹that secret inversion of loveliness; their lost position, itself, in the new land, the cold, disease, starvation inexplicable, unavoided troubles; their committing themselves not to any plan but floating on the ocean as a seed to God‹ to the sea and the winds‹trustful, in a leaky boat. It is the weakling in us all that finds this beautiful. So with the low condition of their words themselves, the bad spelling of their journal; treated with contempt by the least of those they had to do with, so contemned that no one would lend them money "so they were forst to selle of some provisions to stop this gape"; their continually expressed love of each other, "Be.loved friends, very we are that there should be occasion of writing at all unto you," etc.

    "So they comited them selves to ye will of God and re.solved to proceed. In sundrie of these storms the winds were so feirce and ye seas so high, as they could not beare a knote of saile, but were forced to hull, for diverce days together. And in one of them, as they thus lay at hull in a mighty storm, a lustie young man (called John Howland) coming upon some occasion above ye gratings, was, with a seel of ye stripe thrown into ye sea: but it pleased God yt he caught hold of ye tope saile halliards, which hung over board, and ran out at great length: yet he held his hould (though he was sundrie fadomes under water) till he was hold up by ye same rope to ye brim of ye water, and then with a boat hooke and other means got into ye stripe again, and his life saved; and though he was something ill with it, yet he lived many years after, and became a profitable member both in church and comone wealth."

    This passage is perfect: the one man of it, at sea, in the merciful guardianship of God, (washed away, howbeit), rely.ing on his own hands and feet saves himself by force of him.self, is hauled back by others like himself; the minute care for detail, the note of his subsequent illness, and yet, the moral at the end.

    And this moral? As with the deformed Æsop, morals are the memory of success that no longer succeeds.

    But the enjoyment of the lust, the hidden flower, they martyrized as the spirit or the soul, has curious turns. Pri.marily despoiled by providence; clinging with the doggedness of a northern race, cold, close and slow to that; they become unfit, except where there exists the same sort of stress which brought them into being; the hard, repressive pioneer soil of the mind. They must have relied on vigorous hypocrisy to save them‹which they did. But this they could not revere.

    If the "puritan" in them could have ended with their entry into the New World and the subtle changes of growth at once have started, (See Cotton Mather's "Wonders of the Invisible World," the prefatory remarks) everything would have been different, but the character of the land was not favorable. They did try to land further south.

    In fear and without guidance, really lost in the world, it is they alone who would later, at Salem, have strayed so far‹ morbidly seeking the flame,‹that terrifying unknown image to which, like savages, they too offered sacrifices of human flesh. It is just such emptiness, revulsion, terror in all ages, which in fire (a projection still of the truth) finds that which lost and desperate men have worshiped. And it is still today the Puritan who keeps his frightened grip upon the throat of the world lest it should prove him‹empty.

    Such would the New World become. Their strength made it, but why, why the perpetual error of remaining at that low point? It is that at which the soul, dying in them, not liberated by death, but death is sad.

    The result of that brave setting out of the Pilgrims has been an atavism that thwarts and destroys. The agonized spirit, that has followed like an idiot with undeveloped brain, governs with its great muscles, babbling in a test of the dead years. Here souls perish miserably, or, escaping, are bent into grotesque designs of violence and despair. It is an added strength thrown to a continent already too powerful for men. One had not expected that this seed of Eneland would come to impersonate, and to marry the very primitive itself; to creep into the very intestines of the settlers and turn them against themselves, to befoul the New World.

    It has become "the most lawless country in the civilized world," a panorama of murders, perversions, a terrific un.governed strength, excusable only because of the horrid beauty of its great machines. To.day it is a generation of gross knownothingism, of blackened churches where hymns groan like charts from stupefied jungles, a generation universally eager to barter permanent values (the hope of an aristocracy) in return for opportunist material advantages, a generation hat.ing those whom it obeys.

    What prevented the normal growth? Was it England, the northern strain, the soil they landed on? It was, of course, the whole weight of the wild continent that made their condition of mind advantageous, forcing it to reproduce its own likeness, and no more.


By Nate on Thursday, September 12, 2002 - 09:48 pm:

    did you type all that in?


By jorge on Thursday, September 12, 2002 - 11:26 pm:

    how kind of you to respond.



By spunky on Friday, September 13, 2002 - 09:23 am:

    Jesus Patrick, and you wonder why I think you hate America?


By dave. on Friday, September 13, 2002 - 10:23 am:

    what's wrong with hating america except that it'll get you an asskicking by rednecks. any sort of deviance could end up in an asskicking by rednecks. rednecks are kind of like the taliban.


By dave. on Friday, September 13, 2002 - 10:25 am:

    patrick, is all that up there available in comic strip format?


By patrick on Friday, September 13, 2002 - 11:46 am:

    are you kidding me nate? do you see any typos (my surefire trademark)?



    i dunno dave, but is should be right?



    spunk...this is from a highly respected American poet. Also, this was written in the 1920s...straight out of the Victorian era and into the decadent 20s. Factor that into what you're reading.

    America was born out of dissent. America should embrace its dissenting opinions as much as it should embrass ultra cheesy photo montage's of eagles, and blown up buildings *rolling eyes* .

    You should be kissing this guys ass for his brilliant writing and this highly insightful piece about our founding. Of course he's dead now so thats not gonna happen.

    Id much prefer something like this over some sappy Erma Bombeck, refrigerator material, column that pays no regard to history nor fact rather preys on emotions.


By spunky on Friday, September 13, 2002 - 12:13 pm:

    "It has become "the most lawless country in the civilized world," a panorama of murders, perversions, a terrific un.governed strength, excusable only because of the horrid beauty of its great machines. To.day it is a generation of gross knownothingism, of blackened churches where hymns groan like charts from stupefied jungles, a generation universally eager to barter permanent values (the hope of an aristocracy) in return for opportunist material advantages, a generation hat.ing those whom it obeys."

    I am not kissing anyone's ass who writes a statement like that.
    Do you beleive it? You think the US commits more murders then any other government in the world? Past or present?


By Nate on Friday, September 13, 2002 - 12:23 pm:

    "are you kidding me nate? do you see any typos (my surefire trademark)? "

    i dunno, man. too many words for me to read.


By J on Friday, September 13, 2002 - 12:43 pm:

    Don't we have more people in jails and prisons than any other country?


By kazoo on Friday, September 13, 2002 - 12:44 pm:

    We put children on death row. Only about 4 other countries do that.


By patrick on Friday, September 13, 2002 - 12:56 pm:

    spunk, that flag around your head is causing you blindness.

    both kazoo and j bring up solid points. actually J, i think Russia recently topped us in the number of people in prison.

    that above paragraph by WCW is quite a statement, even more applicable now than it was, when written.

    we are the only country ever to use a nuclear weapon spunk. how many people died in Hiroshima and Nagasaki spunk? HOW MANY?????? Hiroshima took over 100,000 people within 30 days and another 20,000 in the following year. Nagasaki killed about 70,000 people by the end of 1945.


    Ever seen the effects of napalm and agent orange in Vietnam? We've used chemicals in warfare too spunk so get off your high horse.


By Dougie on Friday, September 13, 2002 - 12:58 pm:

    I read that line more as our citizens murdering citizens, not the US killing others in war.


By kazoo on Friday, September 13, 2002 - 01:22 pm:

    Dougie, I think you're right but the point remains that the United States has much to be held accountable for.


By spunky on Friday, September 13, 2002 - 01:40 pm:

    How many died before we dropped them?
    How more would have died if we had not dropped them?
    What, then, is your suggestion? What would you recommend? How would you run international relations?
    How would you secure our financial necessities?
    What would you do, make cars illegal and electric plants only use hydro electric plants?
    How do you think we would get enough heat generated to forge the steel we need to build houses instead of wood?
    Do you think we must wait until 3 thousand more are killed via toxic nerve gas?
    Should we sit on our ass and wait until the Empire State Building is brought down with a truck bomb?

    Get some balls, dammit.


By patrick on Friday, September 13, 2002 - 01:47 pm:

    oh please, how idiotic.

    spunk, no one is claming to have all the answers but don't be so ignorant to what we have done as a nation, and don't wince at intellectual criticism just because it doesnt toot the horn that suits you.


By kazoo on Friday, September 13, 2002 - 01:48 pm:

    Why do we have to have to have the knowledge of a diplomat, economist, and engineer to post an opinion that differs from yours?


By J on Friday, September 13, 2002 - 02:44 pm:

    I will have to say that a little voice in the back of my head keeps asking me,what if Bush knows something that they aren't telling the American people about in regards to his rush for nukeing Iraq.Anyone see the interveiw with Saddam's mistress on t.v. last night?


By patrick on Friday, September 13, 2002 - 02:44 pm:

    there is plenty they arent telling us.


By kazoo on Friday, September 13, 2002 - 03:17 pm:

    Does it seem strange to anyone else to think of Saddam having a mistress? Despite our criticism, it's just so difficult for me to think of these people in any other context. Or like, what Osama Bin Laden was like as a 3 year old...or even our own Dick Cheney as a six year old with a teddy bear.

    Like, I'm trying to picture Castro eating a sandwich and it just doesn't work. I did a double-take when I read a quote from Carter in which he referred to him as MISTER Castro. That just sounded wierd in way that I can't seem to explain.

    The media is so dehumanizing...but then again, I hate those Bart's People "real people doing real things" Goody-goody stories...well, not all of them. Just the stupid ones.


By Nate on Friday, September 13, 2002 - 03:19 pm:

    people die in war. there is plenty we don't want to know.

    people are not fundementally good.

    if we do not protect our civilization, someone else's civilization will take over.

    i like t&a.

    people may have to die.


By patrick on Friday, September 13, 2002 - 03:21 pm:

    infidel


By kazoo on Friday, September 13, 2002 - 03:23 pm:

    Or, what kind of pajamas does Qaddhafi wear to bed?

    I wonder what he's been up to lately.


By spunky on Friday, September 13, 2002 - 03:28 pm:

    I never said that patrick did not have the right post a different opinion. You know that. you are not new, kazoo.
    All I am asking for here is a suggestion.
    See, people are condemning decisions but not comeing up with alternatives.
    I just want to know what he thinks we shoud do, if anything.


By dave. on Friday, September 13, 2002 - 03:29 pm:

    is it me or have people here been saying nonsensical things? or is it just typos?

    "i dunno dave, but is should be right?"

    "i think it extrapolate that out and you accept the righteousness of an otherwise evil organization without moral bankruptcy. "

    i can't figure out what these were intended to say.


By patrick on Friday, September 13, 2002 - 03:33 pm:

    dave you asked me:

    "patrick, is all that up there available in comic strip format?"

    and I replied "I dunno dave, but iT should be right?"

    you guys should be able to read my typo-riddled jibberish by now.


By kazoo on Friday, September 13, 2002 - 03:39 pm:

    "See, people are condemning decisions but not comeing up with alternatives."

    We don't have the alterntives because we don't have that knowledge. But there are others that do. There are whole schools dedicated to non-violence conflict resolution and different means of resource distribution and environmentally friendly power sources.

    Maybe we can't call these up, but we know that there is sound research and intelligence behind a lot of our claims. And maybe there's not a lot we can do but it's better than just being content to defend the status quo and the monkeyfucktards running the show. That doesn't take much.




By kazoo on Friday, September 13, 2002 - 03:41 pm:

    John Ashcroft.

    Boxers or briefs?

    And do you think he's got one of those silky man-robes or is it just some plain flannel number from L.L. Bean?


By Nate on Friday, September 13, 2002 - 03:42 pm:

    i plede drankenus


By Nate on Friday, September 13, 2002 - 03:42 pm:

    and i think i have wacheritus in my rite rist.


By Spider on Friday, September 13, 2002 - 03:45 pm:

    John Ashcroft -- oh, come on. How could it be anything other than briefs? And a blue flannel robe.


By Dougie on Friday, September 13, 2002 - 03:45 pm:

    It's you dave. What's understand so hard about to "i dunno dave, but is should be right?"

    I dunno, dave maybe agatha should the to doctor.

    Wears Qaddafi? no doubt Martha Stewart with no doubt bigassed monkeyfucktardfooties.


By Nate on Friday, September 13, 2002 - 03:47 pm:

    "Wears Qaddafi? no doubt Martha Stewart with no doubt bigassed monkeyfucktardfooties."

    put that on your list, dave..


By dave. on Friday, September 13, 2002 - 03:54 pm:

    now that made perfect sense.

    patrick: a comma between be and right would have helped.


By patrick on Friday, September 13, 2002 - 04:07 pm:

    commas cost money dave.


    YOU THINK IM MADE OUT OF MONEY????


By dave. on Friday, September 13, 2002 - 04:23 pm:

    i guess apostrophes cost money, too. question marks appear to be free, though. interesting.


By semillama on Friday, September 13, 2002 - 05:42 pm:

    Spunky: WCW was writing from a context you
    aren't familiar with. Lynchings were common,
    labor unrest was prevalent, our nation had
    recently (60 years previously) gone to war with
    itself, and of course there was the horrific
    genocide of native american groups fresh in
    some people of conscience's minds. 56
    million or so at 1492, about 200,000 at 1900.
    Ever hear of Wounded Knee, spunk?
    Not to mention the environmental rape of the
    19th century, which I think is just literally
    incomprehensable. Passenger pigeon flocks
    used to number in the billions, you know, and
    it only took about 30 years to wipe out them
    and the buffalo.

    Face it, America has a very bloody past. We
    wouldn't be the same nation you are so proud
    of today if it weren't for the trail of gore that
    brought us here. The great things that
    happened here, civil rights movement,
    suffrage, etc, happened because they were a
    protest against what was wrong in this
    country.

    I suppose you would have told Susan B.
    Anthony and Martin Luther King they hated
    America, too.


By semillama on Friday, September 13, 2002 - 05:45 pm:

    Ps, the Pilgrims were right bastards who only
    survived becasue they happened to land in a
    spot in the coast that was only unoccupied
    because smallpox had wiped out the native
    populations a few years previously. A few
    more miles up or down the coast, and they
    might have had more hostile neighbors.

    ppps. speaking of germ warfare, let me point
    out that smallpox blankets are a good
    example of that.


By agatha on Friday, September 13, 2002 - 06:32 pm:

    patrick, do you remember when you asked me for an example of spelling and grammar affecting your meeting?

    that what you did sed. baffor.


By patrick on Friday, September 13, 2002 - 06:38 pm:

    you need help.




By agatha on Friday, September 13, 2002 - 06:40 pm:

    heh. amen to that!


By Baloogalover on Saturday, September 25, 2004 - 12:11 pm:

    All I know is that I know nothing at all... that is knownothingism


bbs.sorabji.com
 

The Stalking Post: General goddam chit-chat Every 3 seconds: Sex . Can men and women just be friends? . Dreamland . Insomnia . Are you stoned? . What are you eating? I need advice: Can you help? . Reasons to be cheerful . Days and nights . Words . Are there any news? Wishful thinking: Have you ever... . I wish you were... . Why I oughta... Is it art?: This question seems to come up quite often around here. Weeds: Things that, if erased from our cultural memory forever, would be no great loss Surfwatch: Where did you go on the 'net today? What are you listening to?: Worst music you've ever heard . What song or tune is going through your head right now? . Obscure composers . Obscure Jazz, 1890-1950 . Whatever, whenever General Questions: Do you have any regrets? . Who are you? . Where are you? . What are you doing here? . What have you done? . Why did you do it? . What have you failed to do? . What are you wearing? . What do you want? . How do you do? . What do you want to do today? . Are you stupid? Specific Questions: What is the cruelest thing you ever did? . Have you ever been lonely? . Have you ever gone hungry? . Are you pissed off? . When is the last time you had sex? . What does it look like where you are? . What are you afraid of? . Do you love me? . What is your definition of Heaven? . What is your definition of Hell? Movies: Last movie you saw . Worst movie you ever saw . Best movie you ever saw Reading: Best book you've ever read . Worst book you've ever read . Last book you read Drunken ramblings: uiphgy8 hxbjf.bklf ghw789- bncgjkvhnqwb=8[ . Payphones: Payphone Project BBS
 

sorabji.com . torturechamber . px.sorabji.com . receipts . contact